Neural image processing of the wear of cutting tools coated with thin films

  • M. J. Jackson
  • G. M. Robinson
  • L. J. Hyde
  • R. Rhodes
Article

Abstract

Small milling cutters are susceptible to very small changes in geometry on the surface of the cutting edge that are substantial when machining at the microscale. The purpose of this paper is to show how to design a neural image processing program to accurately determine the amount of wear accumulated on small milling cutters after successive machining operations. After determining the amount of wear on a small milling cutter, the program creates the appropriate amount of compensation to be used for a computer numerical control (CNC) machining program that will account for in-process tool wear.

Keywords

machining milling tools neural networks surfaces tool coatings 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S.C. Lin and C.J. Ting, Drill Wear Monitoring Using Neural Networks, Int. J. Machine Tools Manuf., 1996, 36(4), p 465–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Das, A.B. Chattopadhyay, and A.S.R. Murty, Force Parameters for On-Line Tool Wear Estimation: A Neural Network Approach, Neural Netw., 1996, 9(9), p 1639–1645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S.C. Lin, Tool Wear Monitoring in Face Milling Using Force Signals, Wear, 1996, 198(1–2), p 136–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    T.J. Ko and D.W. Cho, Tool Wear Monitoring in Diamond Turning by Fuzzy Pattern Recognition, J. Eng. Ind., Trans. ASME, 1994, 116(2), p 225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.E.R. Bonifacio and A.E. Diniz, Correlating Tool Wear, Tool Life, and Surface Roughness and Tool Vibration in Finish Turning with Coated Carbide, Wear, 1994, 173(1–2), p 137–144CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.H. Ahn, H.S. Lim, S. Takata, and T. Sata, Machining Process/Tool Wear Monitoring System Based on Real-Time Sound Recognition, Seimitsu Kogaku Kaishi/J. Jpn. Soc. Precision Eng., 1994, 60(8), p 1144–1148Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C.R. Heiple, S.H. Carpenter, D.L. Armentrout, and A.P. McManigle, Acoustic Emission from Single Point Machining Source Mechanisms and Signal Changes with Tool Wear, Mater. Eval., 1994, 52(5), p 590–596Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Takeshita and I. Inasaki, Monitoring of Milling Processes with an Acoustic Emission Sensor, Seimitsu Kogaku Kaishi/J. Jpn. Soc. Precision Eng., 1993, 59(2), p 269–274Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A.E. Diniz, J.J. Liu, and D.A. Dornfield, Correlating Tool Life, Tool Wear and Surface Roughness by Monitoring Acoustic Emission in Finish Turning, Wear, 1992, 152, p 395–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. J. Jackson
    • 1
  • G. M. Robinson
    • 1
  • L. J. Hyde
    • 2
  • R. Rhodes
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Advanced ManufacturingPurdue UniversityWest Lafayette
  2. 2.Center for Manufacturing ResearchTennessee Technological UniversityCookeville

Personalised recommendations