Abstract
Hypoeutectic cast iron specimens cast using chills that are water-cooled and liquid-nitrogen-cooled (subzero chilling) were compared with specimens of the same chemical composition, which were sand-cast without any chill. The solidification behavior, number of eutectic cells, grain size, and effects of these on the mechanical properties such as strength and fracture toughness were recorded and analyzed in this paper.
It is revealed from the above investigation that subzero and water-cooled chilled cast irons exhibit severe under cooling as compared to that of normal sand-cast iron. Thus, it is concluded from the investigation that nucleation conditions are completely altered during solidification, which is considered to be responsible for the variation in eutectic cell size, grain size, microstructure, and hence mechanical properties of the cast iron.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R.T. Wimber: Trans. AFS, 1980, vol. 88, p. 717.
D.O. Morton: Foundry Practice-Foseco, 1979, Dec. (200), p. 138.
D.M. Stefunescu and C.R. Loper: Giesseri, 1981, Mar. (5), p. 73.
T.J. Baker: Trans. AFS, 1978, vol. 88, p. 13.
K. Suzuki and N. Kayama: Trans. AFS, 1982, vol. 90, p. 423.
R.T. DeHoff and F.N. Rhines: Trans. AFS, 1982, vol. 90, p. 423.
H. Fedriksson and M. Hillert: Br. Foundryman, 1971, Feb., p. 54.
D. Gloveratal: Trans. AFS, 1982, vol. 90, p. 745.
R.W. Heine and C.R. Loper: Trans. AFS, 1969, vol. 77, p. 185.
G.F. Ruff and J.F. Wallace: Trans. AFS, 1977, vol. 85, p. 179.
J.Y. Dawson and W. Oldfield: BCIRA J., 1960, vol. 8 (2), p. 221.
B.E. Read Hill: Physical Metallurgy Principles, Affiliated East West Press, New Delhi, India, 1974, p. 665.
K.W.H. Seah, J. Hemanth, and S.C. Sharma: J. Mater. Sci., 1995, vol. 30, p. 4986.
M.O. Spiegeletal: Ind. Foundry J., 1984, vol. 35, p. 15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hemanth, J. Solidification behavior of water-cooled and subzero-chilled cast iron on mechanical properties. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 10, 212–219 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1361/105994901770345231
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1361/105994901770345231