New theoretical bounds on the aperiodic correlation functions of binary sequences
- 41 Downloads
In order to reduce or eliminate the multiple access interference in code division multiple access (CDMA) systems, we need to design a set of spreading sequences with good autocorrelation functions (ACF) and crosscorrelation functions (CCF). The importance of the spreading codes to CDMA systems cannot be overemphasized, for the type of the code used, its length, and its chip rate set bounds on the capability of the system that can be changed only by changing the code. Several new lower bounds which are stronger than the well-known Sarwate bounds, Welch bounds and Levenshtein bounds for binary sequence set with respect to the spreading sequence length, family size, maximum aperiodic autocorrelation sidelobe and maximum aperiodic crosscorrelation value are established.
Keywordsaperiodic correlation functions binary sequences Levenshtein bounds Sarwate bounds Welch bounds Sidelnikov bounds
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Fan, P. Z., Darnell, M., Sequence Design for Communications Applications, New York: Wiley, 1996.Google Scholar
- 7.Sidelnikov, V. M., On mutual correlation of sequences, Soviet Math Doklady, 1971, 12: 197–201.Google Scholar
- 8.Massey, J. L., On Welch’s Bound for the crosscorrelation of a sequence set, Proceedings of EEE ISIT’90, Sept. 1990, 385.Google Scholar
- 10.Peng, D. Y., Fan, P. Z., Bounds on Aperiodic auto- and cross-correlations of binary sequences with low or zero correlation zone, PDCAT’2003 Proceedings, IEEE Press, August, 2003, 882–886.Google Scholar
- 11.Fan, P. Z., Hao, L., Generalized orthogonal sequences and their applications in synchronous CDMA systems, IEICE Trans. Fundamentals, 2000, E83-A(11): 1–16.Google Scholar
- 14.Li, D. B., The perspective of large area synchronous CDMA technology for the fourth-generation mobile radio, IEEE Communication Magazine, March 2003, 114–118.Google Scholar
- 15.Li, W. C. Y., The most spectrum-efficient duplexing system: CDD, IEEE Communication Magazine, March 2002, 163–166.Google Scholar