Demography

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 323–345 | Cite as

Ethnic intermarriage in times of social change: The case of latvia

  • Christiaan W. S. Monden
  • Jeroen Smits
Article

Abstract

We gain insight into the dynamics of ethnic intermarriage in times of social change by studying marriages between Latvians and Russians (including Belarussians and Ukrainians) that occurred in Latvia before and after independence from the Soviet Union. Before independence, ethnic intermarriage was already rather common, involving about 17% of the marriages annually. Since independence, intermarriage between Russians and Latvians has increased substantially. Part of this increase can be explained by selective emigration, but at least half of it may be due to integrative processes. Although there were more marriages between Russian men and Latvian women before independence, the gender pattern reversed after independence. Intermarriage levels were the highest among the less educated, children of mixed couples, partners with similar educational levels, and people in the countryside.

Keywords

Marriage Market Social Exchange Theory Soviet Period Mixed Marriage Ethnic Relation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aasland, A. and T. Flotten. 2001. “Ethnicity and Social Exclusion in Estonia and Latvia.” Europe-Asia Studies 53:1023–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agresti, A. 2002. Categorical Data Analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alba, R. and R.M. Golden. 1986. “Patterns of Ethnic Marriage in the United States.” Social Forces 65:202–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blau, P.M. and J.E. Schwartz. 1984. Crosscutting Social Circles. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Boguszak, M. and M. Bozon. 1989. “L’Homogamie Sociale en Tchécoslovaquie” [Social homogamy in Czechoslovakia]. Population 44:198–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Botev, N. 1994. “Where East Meets West: Ethnic Intermarriage in the Former Yugoslavia, 1962 to 1989.” American Sociological Review 59:461–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. — 2002. “The Ethnic Composition of Families in Russia in 1989: Insights Into the Soviet ’Nationalities Policy.’” Population and Development Review 24:681–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Codagnone, C. 1998. New Migration and Migration Politics in Post-Soviet Russia. Ethnobarometer Working Paper Series No. 2. CSS/CEMES, Roma.Google Scholar
  9. Coleman, D. 1985. “Ethnic Intermarriage in Great Britain.” Population Trends 40:4–10.Google Scholar
  10. Drachsler, J. 1921. Intermarriage in New York City: A Statistical Study of the Amalgamation of European Peoples. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Evans, G. and A. Need. 2002. “Explaining Ethnic Polarization Over Attitudes Towards Minority Rights in Eastern Europe: A Multilevel Analysis.” Social Science Research 31:653–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ezera, L. 1999. “The Development of Ethnic Assimilation in Latvia in the 1990s.” Humanities and Social Sciences Latvia 3(24):83–96.Google Scholar
  13. Fisher, W.A. 1980. The Soviet Marriage Market: Mate-Selection in Russia and the USSR. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  14. Gordon, M.M. 1964. Assimilation in American Life. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Grigorievs, A. 1996. “The Baltic Predicament.” Pp. 120–37 in Europe’s New Nationalism, edited by R. Caplan and J. Feffer. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gündüz-Hosgör, A. and J. Smits. 2002. “Intermarriage Between Turks and Kurds in Contemporary Turkey.” European Sociological Review 18:417–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jansen, C. 1982. “Inter-ethnic Marriages.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 23: 225–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson, R. 1980. Religious Assortative Marriage in the United States. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  19. Jones, F. 1991. “Ethnic Intermarriage in Australia, 1950–52 to 1980–82: Models or Indices?“ Population Studies 45:27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kalmijn, M. 1991. “Shifting Boundaries, Trends in Religious and Educational Homogamy.” American Sociological Review 56:786–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. — 1993. “Trends in Black/White Intermarriage.” Social Forces 72:119–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. — 1998. “Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends.” Annual Review of Sociology 25:395–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Karklins, R. 1986. Ethnic Relations in the USSR: The Perspective From Below. Boston: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  24. Kennedy, R.J.R. 1944. “Single or Triple Melting Pot? Intermarriage Trends in New Haven.” American Journal of Sociology 49:331–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Latvian Central Bureau of Statistics. 2002a. Demographic Yearbook of Latvia. Riga: CSP.Google Scholar
  26. —. 2002b. Results of the 2000 Population and Housing Census in Latvia. Riga: CSP.Google Scholar
  27. —. 2004. Demographic Yearbook of Latvia. Riga: CSP.Google Scholar
  28. Lee, S.M. 1988. “Intermarriage and Ethnic Relations in Singapore.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 50:255–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lieberson, S. and M. Waters. 1988. From Many Strands: Ethnic and Racial Groups in Contemporary America. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Lieven, A. 1993. The Baltic Revolution: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and the Path to Independence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Lu, H. and R. Wong. 1998. “Cohort Trends in Educational and Ethnic Intermarriage of Taiwan.” Pp. 431–61 in Proceedings of the Conference on Social Stratification and Mobility: Newly Industrializing Economies Compared. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
  32. Mare, R.D. 1991. “Five Decades of Educational Assortative Mating.” American Sociological Review 56:15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mediju Tilts. 2001. “Content Analysis of Mass Media: Press.” Report for the Naturalization Board of the Republic of Latvia (LRNP). Mediju Tilts & LRNP, Riga.Google Scholar
  34. Merton, R.K. 1941. “Intermarriage and Social Structure: Fact and Theory.” Psychiatry 4:361–74.Google Scholar
  35. Mezs, I., E. Bunkse, and K. Rasa. 1994. “The Ethno-Demographic Status of the Baltic States.” Geo Journal 33:9–25.Google Scholar
  36. Misiunas, R. and R. Taagerpera. 1993. The Baltic States; Years of Dependence 1940–1990. London:Hurst.Google Scholar
  37. Muñoz-Perez, F. and M. Tribalat. 1984. “Marriages d’Étrangers et Marriages Mixtes en France” [Marriages of strangers and mixed marriages in France]. Population 44:427–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Prikulis, J. 1997. “Migration and Repatriation Issues in Post-Soviet Countries: The Latvian Case.” NATO Research Fellowship Report. Riga. Available on-line at http://www.nato.int/acad/fellow/ 95–97/prikulis.pdfGoogle Scholar
  39. Qian, Z. 1997. “Breaking the Racial Barriers: Variations in Interracial Marriage Between 1980 and 1990.” Demography 34:263–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Raftery, A.E. 1986. “Choosing Models for Cross-Classifications.” American Sociological Review 51:145–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. — 1995. “Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research.” Sociological Methodology 25: 111–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schoen, R. and J. Wooldredge. 1989. “Marriage Choices in North Carolina and Virginia, 1969–71 and 1979–81.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 51:465–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smits, J. 2002. “Ethnic Intermarriage and Social Cohesion: What Can We Learn From Yugoslavia?” Unpublished manuscript. Available on-line at http://home.planet.nl/~smits.jeroenGoogle Scholar
  44. Susokolov, A.A. 1987. Mezhnatsionalnye Braki v SSSR [International marriages in the USSR]. Moscow: Mysl.Google Scholar
  45. Ultee, W., J. Dessens, and J. Jansen. 1988. “Why Does Unemployment Come in Couples?” European Sociological Review 4:111–22.Google Scholar
  46. Uš ackis, U. 1995. “The Demographic Situation in Latvia: A Statistical View.” Humanities and Social Sciences Latvia 2(7):4–16.Google Scholar
  47. Zaagman, R. 1999. Conflict Prevention in the Baltic States: The OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Flensburg: European Centre for Minority Issues.Google Scholar
  48. Zvidrinš, P. 1998. Latvijas Iedzivot aju Etnisk a Sast ava Izmainas 90. Gados [Changes of ethnic structure in Latvia in the 1990s]. Riga: LU Demogr afijas Centrs.Google Scholar
  49. Zvidrinš, P., L. Ezera, and A. Greitans. 1998. Fertility and Family Surveys in Countries of the ECE Region, Standard Country Report: Latvia. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
  50. Zvidrinš, P. and I. Vanovska. 1992. Latvieš i: Statistiski Demogrāfisks Protretejums [Latvians: Statistical demographic portrait]. Riga: Zinā tne.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christiaan W. S. Monden
    • 1
  • Jeroen Smits
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Social Cultural SciencesTilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Radboud University NijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations