How enduring were the inequalities among European immigrant groups in the United States?
- 109 Downloads
A long-standing and unresolved issue in the study of racial and ethnic groups concerns the persistence of initial inequalities among groups. Recently it has surfaced again in the study of U.S. immigrant groups, in George Borjas’s (1994) claim that the human capital differences among early-twentieth-century immigrant groups are reflected in the relative socioeconomic achievements of their third generations. Reexamining this claim, we find that Borjas’s analysis hinges on a series of problematic decisions, such as his inclusion of non-European groups as well as his failure to take ethnically mixed ancestry into account and to compensate for the weak correspondence in eastern Europe between ethnic ancestry and the national frontiers of the early 1900s. We replicate a portion of his analysis, correcting for these problems. Our results reveal no correspondence between the literacy of the first generation and the educational attainment of the third among European groups. Borjas’s analysis seems to go farthest astray in including non-Europeans, especially Mexicans, because of the more systematic legal and social liabilities suffered by these groups.
KeywordsHuman Capital Immigrant Group Literacy Rate General Social Survey Mixed Ancestry
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Acuña, R. 1988. Occupied America: A History of Chicanos. 3rd ed. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Alba, R. 1985: Italian Americans: Into the Twilight of Ethnicity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- — 1990. Ethnic Identity: The Transformation of White America. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Bean, F., J. Chapa, R. Berg, and K. Sowards. 1994. “Educational and Sociodemographic Incorporation Among Hispanic Immigrants to the United States.” Pp. 73–100 in Immigration and Ethnicity, edited by B. Edmonston and J. Passel. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
- — 1999. Heaven’s Door: Immigration Policy and the American Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Calavita, K. 1992. Inside the State: The Bracero Program, Immigration, and the INS. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Davis, J. and T. Smith. 1996. General Social Surveys, 1972–1996: Cumulative Codebook. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.Google Scholar
- Gordon, L. 1999. The Great Arizona Orphan Abduction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Gordon, M. 1964. Assimilation in American Life. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- — 1980. A Piece of the Pie: Blacks and White Immigrants Since 1880. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Lieberson, S. and M. Waters. 1988. From Many Strands: Ethnic and Racial Groups in Contemporary America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Lopez, D. and R. Stanton-Salazar. 2001. “Mexican Americans: A Second Generation at Risk.” Pp. 57–90 in Ethnicities: Coming of Age in Immigrant America, edited by R. Rumbaut and A. Portes. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Portes, A. and R. Rumbaut. 1996. Immigrant America: A Portrait. 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Sánchez, G. 1993. Becoming Mexican American: Ethnicity, Culture, and Identity in Chicano Los Angeles, 1900/2-1945. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Waters, M. 1990. Ethnic Options: Choosing Identities in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar