, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 147–159 | Cite as

Racial intermarriage pairings

  • Vincent Kang Fu
Assortative Marriage in the United States


Most studies of racial intermarriage rely on the prevalence of intermarriage to measure the strength of group boundaries, without scrutinizing the nature of intermarriage pairings. Examination of intermarried couples’ characteristics reveals (1) that intermarriages and endogamous marriages follow different patterns, and (2) that intermarriage pairings for some groups reflect a generalized racial status hierarchy. According to evidence from the 1990 U.S. Census PUMS, patterns in blacks’ and Mexican Americans’ marriages with whites suggest that a generalized racial status hierarchy disadvantages members of these minority groups. For marriages between Japanese Americans and whites, however, crossing the group boundary does not affect couples’ characteristics.


Marriage Market Racial Status Group Boundary Endogamous Marriage Racial Boundary 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agresti, A. 1990. Categorical Data Analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Alba, R. 1990. Ethnic Identity: The Transformation of White America. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Alba, R. and V. Nee. 1996. “Rethinking Assimilation Theory for a New Era of Immigration.” Presented at the conference “Becoming American/America Becoming: International Migration to the United States,” January 18–21, Sanibel Island, FL.Google Scholar
  4. Bean, F. and M. Tienda. 1987. The Hispanic Population of the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, G. 1991. A Treatise on the Family. Enlarged ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, D. 1992. Faces at the Bottom of the Well: The Permanence of Racism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Bernard, J. 1966. “Note on Educational Homogamy in Negro-White and White-Negro Marriages, 1960.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 28:274–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berreman, G. 1972. “Race, Caste, and Other Invidious Distinctions in Social Stratification.” Race 13:385–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beteille, A. 1975. “Race, Caste, and Ethnic Identity.” Pp. 211–33 in Race, Science, and Society, edited by L. Kuper. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  10. Bobo, L. 1997. “The Color Line, the Dilemma, and the Dream.” Pp. 31–55 in Civil Rights and Social Wrongs, edited by J. Higham. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bobo, L. and C. Zubrinsky. 1996. “Attitudes on Residential Integration: Perceived Status Differences, Mere In-Group Preference, or Racial Prejudice?” Social Forces 74:883–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark, W. 1992. “Residential Preferences and Residential Choices in a Multiethnic Context.” Demography 29:451–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clogg, C. and E. Shihadeh. 1994. Statistical Models for Ordinal Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Cornell, S. 1990. “Land, Labour, and Group Formation: Blacks and Indians in the United States.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 13:368–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cox, O. 1942. “The Modern Caste School of Race Relations.” Social Forces 21:218–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. — 1945. “Race and Caste: A Distinction.” American Journal of Sociology 50:360–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Curtis, R. 1986. “Household and Family in Theory on Inequality.” American Sociological Review 51:168–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davis, K. 1941. “Intermarriage in Caste Societies.” American Anthropologist 43:376–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Edwards, J. 1969. “Familial Behavior as Social Exchange.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 31:518–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goode, W. 1964. The Family. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Gordon, M. 1964. Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hacker, A. 1992. Two Nations: Black and White, Separate and Unequal. New York: Scriber’s.Google Scholar
  23. Hallinan, M. and R. Williams. 1989. “Interracial Friendship Choices in Secondary Schools.” American Sociological Review 54:67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heer, D. 1974. “The Prevalence of Black-White Marriage in the United States, 1960 and 1970.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 36:246–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hwang, S., R. Saenz, and B. Aguirre. 1995. “The SES Selectivity of Interracially Married Asians.” International Migration Review 29:469–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ishii-Kuntz, M. 1994. Ordinal Log-Linear Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Johnson, R. 1980. Religious Assortative Marriage in the United States. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kalmijn, M. 1991. “From Family Origins to Individual Destinations.” PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology, UCLA.Google Scholar
  29. — 1993. “Trends in Black/White Intermarriage.” Social Forces 72:119–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. — 1998. “Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, and Trends.” Annual Review of Sociology 24:395–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lieberson, S. and M. Waters. 1988. From Many Strands. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  32. Mare, R. 1991. “Five Decades of Educational Assortative Mating.” American Sociological Review 56:15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Massey, D. and N. Denton. 1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. McCall, C. 1990. Class, Ethnicity, and Social Inequality. Buffalo: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Merton, R. 1941. “Intermarriage and the Social Structure: Fact and Theory.” Psychiatry: A Journal of the Biology and the Pathology of Interpersonal Relations 4:361–74.Google Scholar
  36. Monahan, T. 1976. “The Occupational Class of Couples Entering Into Interracial Marriages.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies 7:175–92.Google Scholar
  37. Murstein, B. 1976. Who Will Marry Whom? Theories and Research in Marital Choice. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  38. — 1986. Paths to Marriage. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Oppenheimer, V. 1997. “Women’s Employment and the Gain to Marriage: The Specialization and Trading Model.” Annual Review of Sociology 23:431–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pang, G. 1994. “Attitudes Toward Interracial and Interethnic Relationships and Intermarriage Among Korean Americans.” Pp. 110–23 in New Visions in Asian American Studies, edited by F. Ng, J. Yung, S. Fugita, and E. Kim. Pullman: Washington State University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Parkin, F. 1979. Marxism and Class Theory: A Bourgeois Critique. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Qian, Z. 1997. “Breaking the Racial Barriers: Variations in Interracial Marriage Between 1980 and 1990.” Demography 34:263–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Raftery, A. 1995. “Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research.” Sociological Methodology 25:111–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schoen, R. 1995. “The Widening Gap Between Black and White Marriage Rates: Context and Implications.” Pp. 103–21 in The Decline in Marriage Among African Americans: Causes, Consequences, and Policy Implications, edited by M. Tucker and C. Mitchell-Kernan. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  45. Schoen, R. and B. Thomas. 1989. “Intergroup Marriage in Hawaii, 1969–1971 and 1979–1981.” Sociological Perspectives 32:365–82.Google Scholar
  46. Schoen, R. and J. Wooldredge. 1989. “Marriage Choices in North Carolina and Virginia, 1969–71 and 1979–81.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 51:465–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schoen, R., J. Wooldredge, and B. Thomas. 1989. “Ethnic and Educational Effects on Marriage Choice.” Social Science Quarterly 70:617–30.Google Scholar
  48. Shinagawa, L. and G. Pang. 1990. “Marriage Patterns of Asian Americans in California, 1980.” Pp. 225–82 in Income and Status Differences Between White and Minority Americans: A Persistent Inequality, edited by S. Chan. Lewiston, NY: Mellen Press.Google Scholar
  49. Sorensen, A. and S. McLanahan. 1987. “Married Women’s Economic Dependency, 1940–1980.” American Journal of Sociology 93:659–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Szelenyi, S. 1994. “Women and the Class Structure.” Pp. 577–82 in Social Stratification: Class, Race, and Gender in Sociological Perspective, edited by D. Grusky. San Francisco: Westview.Google Scholar
  51. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1993. Census of Population and Housing, 1990 United States: Public Use Microdata Sample: 5 Percent Sample [MRDF]. Second release. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census [producer]. Ann Arbor: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].Google Scholar
  52. Weber, M. 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by H. Gerth and C. Mills. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Zubrinsky, C. and L. Bobo. 1996. “Prismatic Metropolis: Race and Residential Segregation in the City of Angels.” Social Science Research 25:335–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vincent Kang Fu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUCLALos Angeles

Personalised recommendations