Demography

, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp 499–510 | Cite as

Forecasting enrollments for immigrant entry-port school districts

  • Peter A. Morrison
Applications of DemoGraphic Models

Abstract

This paper projects school enrollments in Santa Ana, California and evaluates the accuracy of the projections. It emphasizes the distinctive aspects of a local setting undergoing substantial immigrant influx and highlights the uncertainties that must be addressed. I adapt existing forecasting approaches to such local situations, match assumptions to future unknowns, and devise “early warning” thresholds keyed to timely decision making. This hybrid approach offers forecasters a useful point of departure in local settings dominated by wide margins of uncertainty and inherently risky assumptions.

Keywords

School District Capture Rate Residential Density Orange County Grade Progression 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alba, R.D., J.R. Logan, B.J. Stults, G. Marzan, and W. Zhang. 1999. “Immigrant Groups in the Suburbs: A Reexamination of Suburbanization and Spatial Assimilation.” American Sociological Review 64:446–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, J.P. and E. Turner. 1997. The Ethnic Quilt. Northridge: Center for Geographical Studies, California State University, Northridge.Google Scholar
  3. Amato, J.A. and J.W. Meyer. 1997. To Call It Home: The New Immigrants of Southwestern Minnesota. Marshall, MN: Crossings Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ascher, W. 1978. Forecasting: An Appraisal for Policy-Makers and Planners. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  5. —. 1981. “The Forecasting Potential of Complex Models.” Policy Sciences 13:247–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Camp, R. 1993. Politics in Mexico. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Demographic Research Unit. 1996a. Refugee Immigration to California, 1990–1994: A Summary in Tables. January. Sacramento: California Department of Finance.Google Scholar
  8. —. 1996b. Actual and Projected Births by County, 1970–2006, With Births by Age of Mother and Fertility Rates. October. Sacramento: California Department of Finance.Google Scholar
  9. —. 1997a. County Population Estimates and Components of Change, 1995–1996, With Historical Estimates, 1990–1995. April. Sacramento: California Department of Finance.Google Scholar
  10. —. 1997b. California Public K-12 Enrollment Projections by Ethnicity: 1997 Series. October. Sacramento: California Department of Finance.Google Scholar
  11. —. 1999. Legal Immigration to California in Federal Fiscal Year 1996. June. Sacramento: California Department of Finance.Google Scholar
  12. Dewar, J.A., C.H. Builder, W.M. Hix, and M.H. Levin. 1993. Assumption-Based Planning: A Planning Tool for Very Uncertain Times. Santa Monica: RAND.Google Scholar
  13. Dunnigan, T., D.P. Olney, M.A. McNall, and M.A. Spring. 1997. “Hmong.” Pp. 145–66 in Case Studies in Diversity: Refugees in America in the 1990s, edited by D.W. Haines. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  14. Goering, J.M. 1989. “Introduction and Overview.” International Migration Review 23:797–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haines, D.W., ed. 1997. Case Studies in Diversity: Refugees in America in the 1990s. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  16. “In Santa Ana, Mexican Villagers Re-Created Community.” 1997. Los Angeles Times, August 4, p. 1.Google Scholar
  17. Jones, R.C. 1982. “Channelization of Undocumented Mexican Migrants to the United States.” Economic Geography 58:156–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kling, R., S. Olin, and M. Poster, eds. 1991. Posturban California: The Transformation of Orange County Since World War II. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lindstrom, D.P. 1996. “Economic Opportunity in Mexico and Return Migration From the United States.” Demography 33:357–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu, J.M., P.M. Ong, and C. Rosenstein. 1991. “Dual Chain Migration: Post-1965 Filipino Immigration to the United States.” International Migration Review 25:487–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Massey, D.S. and K.E. Espinosa. 1997. “What’s Driving Mexico-U.S. Migration? A Theoretical, Empirical, and Policy Analysis.” American Journal of Sociology 102:939–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Massey, D.S., L. Goldring, and J. Durand. 1994. “Continuities in Transnational Migration: An Analysis of Nineteen Mexican Communities.” American Journal of Sociology 99:1492–1533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Myers, D., W.C. Baer, and S.-Y. Choi. 1996. “The Changing Problem of Overcrowded Housing.” Journal of the American Planning Association 62(1):66–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Myers, D. and S.W. Lee. 1996. “Immigration Cohorts and Residential Overcrowding in Southern California.” Demography 33:51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Orange County Health Care Agency. 1996. Tabulations of births by Orange County census tracts. Unpublished documents.Google Scholar
  26. Perry, M. and P. Voss. 1996. “Using Geo-Demographic Methods for Improving Small Area Estimates.” Presented at the annual meetings of the Population Association of America, May 11, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  27. Phillips, J.A. and D.S. Massey. 2000. “Engines of Immigration: Stocks of Human and Social Capital in Mexico.” Social Science Quarterly 81(1):33–48.Google Scholar
  28. Plane, D.A. and G.F. Mulligan. 1997. “Measuring Spatial Focusing in a Migration System.” Demography 34:251–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rodriguez, C.E. 1989. Puerto Ricans Born in the U.S.A. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  30. Rubin-Kurtzman, J.R., R. Ham-Chande, and M.D. Van Arsdol. 1996. “Population in Trans-Border Regions: The Southern California-Baja California Urban System.” International Migration Review 30:1020–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stull, D.D., M.J. Broadway, and K.C. Erickson. 1992. “The Price of a Good Steak: Beef Packing and Its Consequences for Garden City, Kansas.” Pp. 35–64 in Structuring Diversity, edited by L. Lamphere. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Swanson, D.A. and J. Tayman. 1995. “Between a Rock and a Hard Place: The Evaluation of Demographic Forecasts.” Population Research and Policy Review 14:233–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Taylor, J.E., P.L. Martin, and M. Fix. 1997. Poverty Amid Prosperity: Immigration and the Changing Face of Rural California. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
  34. Tayman, J. 1996. “The Accuracy of Small-Area Population Forecasts Based on a Spatial Interaction Land-Use Modeling System.” Journal of the American Planning Association 62(1):85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tayman, J. and D.A. Swanson. 1996. “On the Utility of Population Forecasts.” Demography 33:523–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. —. 1999. “On the Validity of MAPE as a Measure of Population Forecast Accuracy.” Population Research and Policy Review 18:299–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Waldinger, R. and M. Bozorgmehr, eds. 1996. Ethnic Los Angeles. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  38. Yokum, J. and J. Armstrong. 1996. “Beyond Accuracy: Comparison of Criteria Used to Select Forecasting Models.” International Journal of Forecasting 11:591–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter A. Morrison
    • 1
  1. 1.RANDSanta Monica

Personalised recommendations