Demography

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 575–587 | Cite as

Forced migration and mortality in the very long term: Did perestroika affect death rates also in Finland?

  • Jan Saarela
  • Fjalar Finnäs
Article

Abstract

In this article, we analyze mortality rates of Finns born in areas that were ceded to the Soviet Union after World War II and from which the entire population was evacuated. These internally displaced persons are observed during the period 1971-2004 and compared with people born in the same region but on the adjacent side of the new border. We find that in the 1970s and 1980s, the forced migrants had mortality rates that were on par with those of people in the comparison group. In the late 1980s, the mortality risk of internally displaced men increased by 20% in relation to the expected time trend. This deviation, which manifests particularly in cardiovascular mortality, coincides with perestroika and the demise of the Soviet Union, which were events that resulted in an intense debate in civil society about restitution of the ceded areas. Because state actors were reluctant to engage, the debate declined after some few years, and after the mid-1990s, the death risk again approached the long-term trend. Our findings indicate that when internally displaced persons must adjust to situations for which appropriate coping behaviors are unknown, psychosocial stress might arise several decades after their evacuation.

Keywords

Psychosocial Stress Coping Behavior Birth Region Death Risk Transitional Economy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahonen, P. 2005. “Taming the Expellee Threat in Post-1945 Europe: Lessons From the Two Germanies and Finland.” Contemporary European History 14:1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ben-Sira, Z. 1997. Immigration, Stress, and Readjustment. West Port, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Boscarino, J.A. 2006. “Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Mortality Among U.S. Army Veterans 30 Years After Military Service.” Annals of Epidemiology 16:248–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cornia, G. 2000. “Short-Term, Long-Term, and Hysteresis Mortality Models: A Review.” Pp. 59–82 in The Mortality Crisis in Transitional Economies, edited by G. Cornia and R. Paniccià. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cornia, G. and R. Paniccià, eds. 2000. The Mortality Crisis in Transitional Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Everson-Rose, S.A. and T.T. Lewis. 2005. “Psychosocial Factors and Cardiovascular Diseases.” Annual Review of Public Health 26:469–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Finnish Karelian League. 2005. “The Karelian Issue—Karelia Action Programme.” Available online at http://www.karjalanliitto. / les/315/karelian_issue.pdf.Google Scholar
  8. Joenniemi, P. 1998. “The Karelian Question: On the Transformation of a Border Dispute.” Cooperation and Conflict 33:183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Paradies, Y. 2004. “A Review of the Relationship Between Psychosocial Stress and Chronic Disease for Indigenous and African American Peoples.” Research report. Cooperative Research C entre for Aboriginal Health, Darwin. Available online at http://www.crcah.org.au/publications /downloads/A_Review_of_the_Relationship.pdf.Google Scholar
  10. Pihkala, K. 1952. “The Land Settlement Program of Finland.” Land Economics 28:147–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Reed, H., J. Haaga, and C. Keely, eds. 1998. The Demography of Forced Migration. Summary of A Workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  12. Reed, H. and C. Keely, eds. 2001. Forced Migration & Mortality. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  13. Riphahn, R. and K. Zimmermann. 2000. “The Mortality Crisis in East Germany.” Pp. 227–52 in The Mortality Crisis in Transitional Economies, edited by G. Cornia and R. Paniccià. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Saarela, J. and F. Finnäs. 2006. “Regional Mortality Variation in Finland: A Study of Two Population Groups.” Genus 62:169–211.Google Scholar
  15. — 2008. “Cause-Specific Mortality at Young Ages: Lessons From Finland.” Health & Place 14:265–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Statistics Finland. 2008. Väestölaskentojen pitkittäistiedosto 1970-1995 [The longitudinal population census le 1970-1995]. Data description. Available online at http://www.stat. /meta / rekisteriselosteet/rekisteriseloste_vaestolaskenta70-95.html.Google Scholar
  17. Stroebe, M., W. Stroebe, and H. Schut. 2001. “Gender Differences in Adjustment to Bereavement: An Empirical and Theoretical Review.” Review of General Psychology 5:62–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tamres, L.K., D. Janicki, and V.S. Helgeson. 2002. “Sex Differences in Coping Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review and an Examination of Relative Coping.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 6:2–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Virtanen, P. 2006. “Asutustoiminta itsenäisessä Suomessa” [Settlement in independent Finland]. Maankäyttö (1):7–11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Saarela
    • 1
  • Fjalar Finnäs
    • 2
  1. 1.Åbo Akademi UniversityVasaFinland
  2. 2.Åbo Akademi UniversityFinland

Personalised recommendations