Demography

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 103–125 | Cite as

Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks*

  • Steven M. Goodreau
  • James A. Kitts
  • Martina Morris
Article

Abstract

In this article, we use newly developed statistical methods to examine the generative processes that give rise to widespread patterns in friendship networks. The methods incorporate both traditional demographic measures on individuals (age, sex, and race) and network measures for structural processes operating on individual, dyadic, and triadic levels. We apply the methods to adolescent friendship networks in 59 U.S. schools from the National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent Health (Add Health). We model friendship formation as a selection process constrained by individuals’ sociality (propensity to make friends), selective mixing in dyads (friendships within race, grade, or sex categories are differentially likely relative to cross-category friendships), and closure in triads (a friend’s friends are more likely to become friends), given local population composition. Blacks are generally the most cohesive racial category, although when whites are in the minority, they display stronger selective mixing than do blacks when blacks are in the minority. Hispanics exhibit disassortative selective mixing under certain circumstances; in other cases, they exhibit assortative mixing but lack the higher-order cohesion common in other groups. Grade levels are always highly cohesive, while females form triangles more than males. We conclude with a discussion of how network analysis may contribute to our understanding of sociodemographic structure and the processes that create it.

Keywords

School Size Demographic Attribute Mutual Friendship Friendship Nomination Triad Closure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, J. and J. Moody. 2007. “To Tell the Truth: Measuring Concordance in Multiply Reported Network Data.” Social Networks 29:44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, C., M. Piazza, D. Mekos, and T. Valente. 2001. “Peers, Schools, and Adolescent Cigarette Smoking.” Journal of Adolescent Health 29:22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bearman, P.S. and J. Moody. 2004. “Suicide and Friendships Among American Adolescents.” American Journal of Public Health 94:89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Besag, J. 1974. “Spatial Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of Lattice Systems.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 36:192–236.Google Scholar
  5. Blau, P.M. 1977. Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Borgatti, S.P. and M.G. Everett. 1999. “Models of Core/Periphery Structures.” Social Networks 21:375–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burt, R.S. 1990. “Kinds of Relations in American Discussion Networks.” Pp. 411–52 in Structures of Power and Constraint, edited by C. Calhoun, M.W. Meyer, and W.R. Scott. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Byrne, D.E. 1971. The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Carley, K. 1991. “A Theory of Group Stability.” American Sociological Review 56:331–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cartwright, D. and F. Harary. 1966. “Structural Balance: A Generalization of Heider’s Theory.” Psychological Review 63:277–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis, J.A. 1967. “Clustering and Structural Balance in Graphs.” Human Relations 20:181–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dunphy, D.C. 1963. “The Social Structure of Urban Adolescent Peer Groups.” Sociometry 26: 230–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feld, S.L. 1981. “The Focused Organization of Social Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 86:1015–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. — 1982. “Social Structural Determinants of Similarity Among Associates.” American Sociological Review 47:797–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feld, S.L. and R. Elmore. 1982. “Patterns of Sociometric Choices: Transitivity Reconsidered.” Social Psychology Quarterly 45(2):77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fershtman, M. 1985. “Transitivity and the Path Census in Sociometry.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 11:159–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fienberg, S.E. and S. Wasserman. 1981. “Categorical Data Analysis of Single Sociometric Relations.” Sociological Methodology 12:156–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frank, O. and D. Strauss. 1986. “Markov Graphs.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 81:832–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Geyer, C.J. and E.A. Thompson. 1992. “Constrained Monte Carlo Maximum Likelihood for Dependent Data.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 54:657–99.Google Scholar
  20. Gile, K. and M.S. Handcock. 2006. “Model-Based Assessment of the Impact of Missing Data on Inference for Networks.” Working Paper No. 66. Center for Statistics and the Social Sciences, University of Washington. Available online at http://www.csss.washington.edu/Papers/wp66.pdf.Google Scholar
  21. Goodreau, S.M. 2007. “Advances in Exponential Random Graph (p*) Models Applied to a Large Social Network.” Social Networks 29:231–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Granovetter, M. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78:1360–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hallinan, M.T. 1982. “Classroom Racial Composition and Children’s Friendships.” Social Forces 61:56–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hallinan, M.T. and R.A. Williams. 1989. “Interracial Friendship Choices in Secondary Schools.” American Sociological Review 54:67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Handcock, M.S. 2003a. “Assessing Degeneracy in Statistical Models of Social Networks.” Working Paper No. 39. Center for Statistics and the Social Sciences, University of Washington. Available online at http://www.csss.washington.edu/Papers/wp39.pdf.Google Scholar
  26. — 2003b. “Statistical Models for Social Networks: Degeneracy and Inference.” Pp. 229–40 in Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers, edited by R.L. Breiger, K.M. Carley, and P. Pattison. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  27. Handcock, M.S., D.R. Hunter, C.T. Butts, S.M. Goodreau, and M. Morris. 2008. “ergm: A Package to Fit, Simulate and Diagnose Exponential-Family Models for Networks.” Journal of Statistical Software 24(3):1–29.Google Scholar
  28. Heider, F. 1958. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Holland, P.W. and S. Leinhardt. 1981. “An Exponential Family of Probability Distributions for Directed Graphs.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 76(373):33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hunter, D.R. 2007. “Curved Exponential Family Models for Social Networks.” Social Networks 29:216–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hunter, D.R., S.M. Goodreau, and M.S. Handcock. 2008. “Goodness of Fit of Social Network Models.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 103(481):248–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hunter, D.R. and M.S. Handcock. 2006. “Inference in Curved Exponential Family Models for Networks.” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15:565–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kandel, D.B. 1978. “Homophily, Selection, and Socialization in Adolescent Friendships.” American Journal of Sociology 84:427–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Koehly, L.M., S.M. Goodreau, and M. Morris. 2004. “Exponential Family Models for Sampled and Census Network Data.” Sociological Methodology 34:241–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kohler, H.P. 1997. “Learning in Social Networks and Contraceptive Choice.” Demography 34: 369–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. — 2000. “Fertility Decline as a Coordination Problem.” Journal of Development Economics 63:231–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kohler, H.P., J.R. Behrman, and S.C. Watkins. 2001. “The Density of Social Networks and Fertility Decisions: Evidence From South Nyanza District, Kenya.” Demography 38:43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lazarsfeld, P.F. and R.K. Merton. 1954. “Friendship as a Social Process: A Substantive and Methodological Analysis.” Pp. 8–66 in Freedom and Control in Modern Society, edited by M. Berger, T. Abel, and C.H. Page. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  39. Mare, R.D. 1991. “Five Decades of Educational Assortative Mating.” American Sociological Review 56:15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marsden, P.V. 1981. “Models and Methods for Characterizing the Structural Parameters of Groups.” Social Networks 3(1):1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Massey, D.S. 1988. “Economic Development and International Migration in Comparative Perspective.” Population and Development Review 14:383–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Massey, D.S., R. Alarcon, J. Durand, and H. Gonzalez. 1987. Return to Aztlan: The Social Process of International Migration From Western Mexico. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  43. May, R.M. and R.M. Anderson. 1988. “The Transmission Dynamics of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV).” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 321(1207):565–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McPherson, J.M. and L. Smith-Lovin. 1987. “Homophily in Voluntary Organizations: Status Distance and the Composition of Face-to-Face Groups.” American Sociological Review 52:370–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin, and J.M. Cook. 2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 27:415–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moody, J. 2001. “Race, School Integration, and Friendship Segregation in America.” American Journal of Sociology 107:679–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Morris, M. 1991. “A Log-Linear Modeling Framework for Selective Mixing.” Mathematical Biosciences 107:349–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Morris, M. and L. Dean. 1994. “Effect of Sexual-Behavior Change on Long-Term Human-Immunodeficiency-Virus Prevalence Among Homosexual Men.” American Journal of Epidemiology 140:217–32.Google Scholar
  49. Morris, M. and M. Kretzschmar. 1997. “Concurrent Partnerships and the Spread of HIV.” AIDS 11:641–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. 2001. Network Variables Codebook. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  51. Rapoport, A. 1957. “A Contribution to the Theory of Random and Biased Nets.” Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 19:257–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Resnick, M.D., P.S. Bearman, R.W. Blum, K.E. Bauman, K.M. Harris, J. Jones, J. Tabor, T. Beuhring, R.E. Sieving, M. Shew, M. Ireland, L.H. Bearinger, and J.R. Udry. 1997. “Protecting Adolescents From Harm. Findings From the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health.” Journal of the American Medical Association 278:823–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rogers, E.M. and D.K. Bhowmik. 1970. “Homophily-Heterophily: Relational Concepts for Communication Research.” Public Opinion Quarterly 34:523–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Snijders, T.A.B. 2002. “Markov Chain Monte Carlo Estimation of Exponential Random Graph Models.” Journal of Social Structure 3(2):1–40.Google Scholar
  55. Snijders, T.A.B., P.E. Pattison, G.L. Robins, and M.S. Handcock. 2006. “New Specications for Exponential Random Graph Models.” Sociological Methodology 36:99–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Snijders, T.A.B. and F.N. Stokman. 1987. “Extensions of Triad Counts to Networks With Different Subsets of Points and Testing Underlying Random Graph Distributions.” Social Networks 9:249–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. South, S.J. and D.L. Haynie. 2004. “Friendship Networks of Mobile Adolescents.” Social Forces 83:315–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Strauss, D. and M. Ikeda. 1990. “Pseudolikelihood Estimation for Social Networks.” Journal of the American Statistical Society 85:204–12.Google Scholar
  59. Udry, J.R. and P.S. Bearman. 1998. “New Methods for New Research on Adolescent Sexual Behavior.” Pp. 241–69 in New Perspectives on Adolescent Risk Behavior, edited by R. Jessor. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Valente, T.W. 2003. “Social Network Influences on Adolescent Substance Use.” Connections 25:1–4.Google Scholar
  61. Valente, T.W., S.C. Watkins, M.N. Jato, A. VanderStraten, and L.P.M. Tsitsol. 1997. “Social Network Associations With Contraceptive Use Among Cameroonian Women in Voluntary Associations.” Social Science & Medicine 45:677–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wasserman, S.S. 1977. “Random Directed Graph Distributions and Triad Census in Social Networks.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 5(1):61–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wasserman, S. and P. Pattison. 1996. “Logit Models and Logistic Regressions for Social Networks: I. An Introduction to Markov Graphs and p*.” Psychometrika 60:401–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Watkins, S.C. and A.D. Danzi. 1995. “Women’s Gossip and Social Change: Childbirth and Fertility Control Among Italian and Jewish Women in the United States, 1920-1940.” Gender & Society 9:469–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Watts, D.J. and S.H. Strogatz. 1998. “Collective Dynamics of ‘Small-World’ Networks.” Nature 393:440–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven M. Goodreau
    • 1
  • James A. Kitts
    • 2
  • Martina Morris
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Anthropology and Center for Studies in Demography and EcologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattle
  2. 2.Graduate School of BusinessColumbia UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations