Advertisement

Clays and Clay Minerals

, Volume 44, Issue 5, pp 677–685 | Cite as

Comparison of Techniques for Determining the Fractal Dimensions of Clay Minerals

  • Kalumbu Malekani
  • James A. Rice
  • Jar-Shyong Lin
Article

Abstract

Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), adsorption and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) techniques were used to determine the fractal dimensions (D) of 3 natural reference clays: 1) a kaolinite (KGa-2); 2) a hectorite (SHCa-1), and 3) a Ca-montmorillonite (STx-1). The surfaces of these clays were found to be fractal with D values close to 2.0. This is consistent with the common description of clay mineral surfaces as smooth and planar. Some surface irregularities were observed for hectorite and Ca-montmorillonite as a result of impurities in the materials. The SAXS method generated comparable D values for KGa-2 and STx-1. These results are supported by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The SAXS and adsorption methods were found to probe the surface irregularities of the clays while the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technique seems to reflect the mass distribution of certain sites in the material. Since the surface nature of clays is responsible for their reactivity in natural systems, SAXS and adsorption techniques would be the methods of choice for their fractal characterization. Due to its wider applicable characterization size-range, the SAXS method appears to be better suited for the determination of the fractal dimensions of clay minerals.

Key Words

Adsorption Clay Fractal NMR Small-angle x-ray scattering 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avnir D. 1986. Fractal aspects of surface science: an interim report. Mat Res Soc Symp Proc 73:321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avnir D, Farin D, Pfeifer P. 1983. Chemistry in noninteger dimensions between two and three. II. Fractal surfaces of adsorbents. J Chem Phys 70:3566–3571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avnir D, Farin D, Pfeifer P. 1984. Molecular fractal surfaces. Nature 308:261–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ben Ohoud M, Obrecht F, Gatineau L. 1988. Surface area, mass fractal dimension, and apparent density of powders. J Coll Interface Sci 124:156–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bottero JY, Tchoubar D, Axelos MAV, Quienne P, Fiessinger E 1990. Flocculation of silica colloids with hydroxy aluminum polycations. Relation between floe structure and aggregation mechanisms. Langmuir 6:596–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braker W, Mossman AL. 1971. Matheson gas data book, Matheson Gas Products: East Rutherford, NJ. 574 p.Google Scholar
  7. Collins MJ, Bishop AN, Farrimond P. 1995. Sorption by mineral surfaces: Rebirth of the classical condensation pathway for kerogen formation? Geochim Cosmochim Acta 59:2387–2391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Devreux F, Boilot JP, Chaput F, Sapoval B. 1990. NMR determination of the fractal dimension in silica aerogels. Phys Rev Lett 65:614–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Farin D, Avnir D. 1989. The fractal nature of molecule-surface interactions and reactions. In: Avnir D, editor. The fractal approach to heterogeneous chemistry. Chichester, England: Wiley, p 271–293.Google Scholar
  10. Gregg SJ, Sing KSW. 1982. Adsorption, surface area, and porosity. London: Academic Press. 371 p.Google Scholar
  11. Keefer KD, Schaefer DW. 1986. Growth of fractally rough colloids. Phys Rev Lett 56:2376–2379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Keil RG, Tsamaskis E, Fuh CB, Giddings JC, Hedges JI. 1994. Mineralogical and textural controls on the organic composition of coastal marine sediments: Hydrodynamic separation using SPLITT-fractionation. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 58:879–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Malekani K, Rice JA. 1995. unpublished research. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007.Google Scholar
  14. Mayer LM. 1994. Surface area control of organic carbon accumulation in continental shelf sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 58:1271–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McClellan AL, Hamsberger HE 1967. Cross sectional area of molecules adsorbed on solid surfaces. J Coll Interface Sci 23:577–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Murphy EM, Zachara JM, Smith SC, Phillips JL, Wietsma TW. 1994. Interaction of hydrophobic organic compounds with mineral-bound humic substances. Environ Sci Technol 28:1291–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ochs M, Cosovic B, Stumm W. 1994. Coordinative and hydrophobic interactions of humic substances with hydrophilic Al2O3 and hydrophobic mercury surfaces. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 58:639–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pfeifer P, Avnir D. 1983. Chemistry in noninteger dimensions between two and three: I. Fractal theory of heterogeneous surfaces. J Chem Phys 79:3558–3565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Reich MH, Russo SP, Snook IK, Wagenfeld HK. 1990. The application of SAXS to determine the fractal properties of porous carbon-based materials. J Coll Interface Sci 135: 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rojanski D, Huppert D, Bale HD, Dacai X, Schmidt PW, Farin D, Seri-Levy A, Avnir D. 1986. Integrated fractal analysis of silica: adsorption, electronic energy transfer, and small-angle x-ray scattering. Phys Rev Lett 56:2505–2508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Russell TP, Lin JS, Spooner S. 1988. Intercalibration of small-angle and neutron scattering data. J Appl Crystalog 21:629–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schaefer DW. 1989. Polymers, fractals, and ceramic materials. Science 243:1023–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schaefer DW, Martin JE. 1984. Fractal geometry of colloidal aggregates. Phys Rev Lett 52:2371–2374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schmidt PW. 1989. Use of scattering to determine the fractal dimension. In: Avnir D, editor. The fractal approach to heterogeneous chemistry. Chichester, England: Wiley, p 67–79.Google Scholar
  25. Sokolowska Z, Stawinski J, Patrykiejew A, Sokolowska S. 1989. A note on fractal analysis of adsorption process by soils and soil minerals. Intemat Agrophys 5:1–23.Google Scholar
  26. Theng BKG. 1974. The chemistry of clay-organic reactions. New York: Wiley. 362 p.Google Scholar
  27. van Damme H, Fripiat JJ. 1985. A fractal analysis of adsorption processes by pillared swelling clays. J Chem Phys 82:2785–2789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. van Damme H, Levitz P, Bergaya F, Alcover JF, Gatineau L, Fripiat JJ. 1986. Monolayer adsorption on fractal surfaces: A simple two-dimensional simulation. J Chem Phys 85: 616–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. van Olphen H. 1963. An introduction to clay colloid chemistry. New York: John Wiley. 346 p.Google Scholar
  30. van Olphen H, Fripiat JJ. 1979. Data handbook for clay materials and non-metallic minerals. Oxford: Pergamon. 301 p.Google Scholar
  31. White GN, Dixon JB, Weaver RM, Kunkle AC. 1991. Genesis and morphology of iron sulfides in gray kaolins. Clays Clay Miner 39:70–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wignall GD, Lin JS, Spooner S. 1990. The reduction of parasitic scattering in small-angle x-ray scattering by three pinhole collimating system. J Appl Crystall 23:241–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Clay Minerals Society 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kalumbu Malekani
    • 1
  • James A. Rice
    • 1
  • Jar-Shyong Lin
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Chemistry and BiochemistrySouth Dakota State UniversityBrookingsUSA
  2. 2.Center for Small-Angle ScatteringSolid-State Division, Oak Ridge National LaboratoryOak RidgeUSA

Personalised recommendations