Skip to main content
Log in

Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Patients with Lung Metastases from Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

  • Thoracic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Approximately 10% of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) develop lung-only metastases. Data regarding the potential role of lung metastasectomy are limited.

Objective

The aim of this case-control study was to determine whether lung metastasectomy prolongs survival in patients with NPC with lung-only metastases.

Methods

The resectability of 215 consecutive patients diagnosed with lung-only metastases from 2001 to 2018 was reviewed by doctors blinded to the patient groups. The propensity score matching method was used to balance the potential probability of being assigned to treatment groups based on pretherapeutic information. Postmetastatic survival (PMS) and cumulative incidence of local failure were compared between the surgical and nonsurgical arms.

Results

Overall, 120 potentially resectable cases were enrolled, and 45 and 22 patients who underwent and did not undergo metastasectomy, respectively, were included in the propensity-matched cohort. Patients who underwent pulmonary resection had better PMS and a lower cumulative incidence of local failure than those who did not undergo surgery. The 5-year PMS rates were 75.53% and 47.81% in the surgical and nonsurgical arms, respectively (difference 27.72%; 95% confidence interval 3.95–51.49%). Younger patients (≤ 45 years), and those with a lower primary N stage (N0-1), longer disease-free interval (> 2 years), smaller total diameter of the metastatic lesions (≤ 3 cm), unilateral distribution of metastases, no mediastinal/hilar lymph node involvement, and adjuvant chemotherapy showed a significantly longer PMS after metastasectomy by multivariable analysis.

Conclusions

Lung metastasectomy may improve PMS and decrease the chance of local treatment failure in NPC patients with potentially resectable lung-only metastases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:7–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang L, Huang Y, Hong S, et al. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2016;388:1883–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shen LJ, Wang SY, Xie GF, et al. Subdivision of M category for nasopharyngeal carcinoma with synchronous metastasis: time to expand the M categorization system. Chin J Cancer. 2015;34:450–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang CJ, Leung SW, Lian SL, Wang CJ, Fang FM, Ho YH. Patterns of distant metastases in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 1996;12:229–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ashworth A, Rodrigues G, Boldt G, Palma D. Is there an oligometastatic state in non-small cell lung cancer? A systematic review of the literature. Lung Cancer. 2013;82:197–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hui EP, Leung SF, Au JS, et al. Lung metastasis alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a relatively favorable prognostic group: a study by the Hong Kong Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Study Group. Cancer. 2004;101:300–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu Y, Takkenberg JJ, Grunkemeier GL. Measuring follow-up completeness. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:1155–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Austin PC. The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments. Stat Med. 2014;33:1242–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xu S, Ross C, Raebel MA, Shetterly S, Blanchette C, Smith D. Use of stabilized inverse propensity scores as weights to directly estimate relative risk and its confidence intervals. Value Health. 2010;13:273–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. Am Stat. 1985;39:33–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Austin PC. Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm Stat. 2011;10:150–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ma J, Wen ZS, Lin P, Wang X, Xie FY. The results and prognosis of different treatment modalities for solitary metastatic lung tumor from nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective study of 105 cases. Chin J Cancer. 2010;29:787–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc. 1999;94:496–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pastorino U, Buyse M, Friedel G, et al. Long-term results of lung metastasectomy: prognostic analyses based on 5206 cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;113:37–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bartlett EK, Simmons KD, Wachtel H, et al. The rise in metastasectomy across cancer types over the past decade. Cancer. 2015;121:747–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Treasure T, Farewell V, Macbeth F, et al. Pulmonary metastasectomy versus continued active monitoring in colorectal cancer (PulMiCC): a multicentre randomised clinical trial. Trials. 2019;20:718.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Milosevic M, Edwards J, Tsang D, et al. Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer: updated analysis of 93 randomized patients: control survival is much better than previously assumed. Colorectal Dis. 2020;22:1314–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Brew-Graves C, Farewell V, Monson K, et al. Pulmonary metastasectomy in colorectal cancer: health utility scores by EQ-5D-3L in a randomised controlled trial show no benefit from lung metastasectomy. Colorectal Dis. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.15386.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Handy JR, Bremner RM, Crocenzi TS, et al. Expert consensus document on pulmonary metastasectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;107:631–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Oki T, Hishida T, Yoshida J, et al. Survival and prognostic factors after pulmonary metastasectomy of head and neck cancer: What are the clinically informative prognostic indicators? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;55:942–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lim SJ, Iyer NG, Ooi LL, et al. Metastasectomy for metachronous pulmonary and hepatic metastases from nasopharyngeal carcinoma: report of 6 cases and review of the literature. Head Neck. 2016;38:E37-40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cheng LC, Sham JS, Chiu CS, Fu KH, Lee JW, Mok CK. Surgical resection of pulmonary metastases from nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Aust N Z J Surg. 1996;66:71–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cao X, He LR, Xie FY, Chen YF, Wen ZS. Factors determining the survival of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with lung metastasis alone: does combined modality treatment benefit? BMC Cancer. 2011;11:370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Matsutani N, Okumura S, Yoshino I, et al. Pneumonectomy in pulmonary metastasis. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9:4523–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gafencu DA, Welter S, Cheufou DH, et al. Pulmonary metastasectomy for sarcoma-Essen experience. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9:S1278-1281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Long H, Tan Q, Luo Q, et al. Thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy for lung cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105:386–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Long H, Zheng Y, Situ D, Ma G, Lin Z, Wang J. Hand-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for bilateral lung metastasectomy through sternocostal triangle access. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:852–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cakmak H, Tokat AO, Karasu S. Is open surgery necessary for metastatic pulmonary tumors evaluated with thorax tomography? Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2018;26:254–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Long H, Jiang L, Lin Y, et al. Hand-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for pulmonary metastasectomy through sternocostal triangle access: superiority in detection of non-imaged pulmonary nodules. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4539.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Macherey S, Doerr F, Heldwein M, Hekmat K. Is manual palpation of the lung necessary in patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;22:351–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shiomi K, Naito M, Sato T, et al. Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy after pulmonary metastasectomy on the prognosis of colorectal cancer. Ann Med Surg. 2017;20:19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Londero F, Morelli A, Parise O, et al. Lymphadenectomy during pulmonary metastasectomy: impact on survival and recurrence. J Surg Oncol. 2019;120:768–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Austin PC. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med. 2009;28:3083–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Foundation for Sci & Tech Research Project of Guangdong [2017A020215138].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Z-RZ: Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, software, visualization, writing—original draft. D-HL: Data curation, methodology, writing—original draft. Y-ZW: Data curation, formal analysis, software. X‐SS: Data curation, resources. HL: Conceptualization, funding acquisition, investigation, project administration, supervision, writing—review and editing

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hao Long MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

10434_2021_9597_MOESM1_ESM.tif

Supplementary Figure S1. Number of lung-only metastasis from nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated during the study period. (TIF 352 kb)

10434_2021_9597_MOESM2_ESM.tif

Supplementary Figure S2. Propensity score matching performance. Matched groups have similar propensity score distributions compared with the entire population. (TIF 2341 kb)

10434_2021_9597_MOESM3_ESM.tif

Supplementary Figure S3. Postmetastatic survival (a) and cumulative incidence of local failure (b) in patients of nasopharyngeal carcinoma developing lung-only metastases who received metastasectomy or not (before matching). (TIF 1713 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (TIF 1792 kb)

Supplementary material 5 (DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, ZR., Liu, DH., Wang, YZ. et al. Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Patients with Lung Metastases from Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 28, 4542–4550 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09597-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-09597-5

Navigation