Advertisement

Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 25, Issue 5, pp 1357–1365 | Cite as

Vertical Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap Repair Improves Perineal Wound Healing after Abdominoperineal Resection for Irradiated Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

  • Milan Spasojevic
  • Anthony B. Mariathasan
  • Mariusz Goscinski
  • Ebbe B. Thorgersen
  • Arne M. Solbakken
  • Hans-Petter Gullestad
  • Truls Ryder
  • Kjersti Flatmark
  • Stein G. Larsen
Colorectal Cancer

Abstract

Background

Radiotherapy (RT) and subsequent abdominoperineal resection (APR) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is associated with significant perineal wound morbidity. The aim of the present study was to investigate if vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (VRAM) flap repair after APR in LARC patients improves perineal wound healing compared with direct perineal wound closure (non-VRAM).

Methods

LARC patients (n = 329) operated with APR between January 2006 and December 2015 after neoadjuvant RT of ≥ 25 Gy were identified, including 260 and 69 patients in the non-VRAM and VRAM groups, respectively. Perineal wound healing was assessed 3 months postoperatively, and risk factors for perineal wound complications and associations with short- and long-term outcome were analyzed.

Results

Delayed perineal wound healing after 3 months was more frequent in the non-VRAM group (31.5%) compared with the VRAM group (10.4%) (p < 0.01). In the non-VRAM group, 26.9% of patients developed pelvic abscess, compared with 10.1% in the VRAM group (p < 0.01). Significant risk factors for perineal wound morbidity were non-VRAM (odds ratio [OR] 3.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.72–9.00; p = 0.02), positive circumferential resection margin (R1; OR 3.64, 95% CI 1.91–6.93; p < 0.01), pelvic abscess (OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.90–5.63; p < 0.01), and short-course RT (OR 3.81, 95% CI 1.75–8.30; p < 0.01). Perineal wound morbidity was not associated with impaired long-term oncologic outcome.

Conclusions

VRAM flap reconstruction of the perineum is associated with an increased wound healing rate and may protect against pelvic abscess development. However, procedure-related long-term morbidity is incompletely studied and the procedure should be reserved for selected patients.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the staff at the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, and Veronica M. Alexandersen, for their invaluable contributions to this work.

Funding

The authors declare no relevant financial relationships.

Disclosures

Milan Spasojevic, Anthony B. Mariathasan, Mariusz Goscinski, Ebbe B. Thorgersen, Arne M. Solbakken, Hans-Petter Gullestad, Truls Ryder, Kjersti Flatmark, and Stein G. Larsen declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Smith JD, Nash GM, Weiser MR, Temple LK, Guillem JG, Paty PB. Multivisceral resections for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2012;99:1137–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Musters GD, Buskens CJ, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ. Perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2014;57:1129–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bullard KM, Trudel JL, Baxter NN, Rothenberger DA. Primary perineal wound closure after preoperative radiotherapy and abdominoperineal resection has a high incidence of wound failure. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:438–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thorgersen EB, Goscinski MA, Spasojevic M, et al. Deep pelvic surgical site infection after radiotherapy and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2017;24:721–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vonlanthen R, Slankamenac K, Breitenstein S, et al. The impact of complications on costs of major surgical procedures: a cost analysis of 1200 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2011;254:907–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Devulapalli C, Jia Wei AT, DiBiagio JR, et al. Primary versus flap closure of perineal defects following oncologic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137:1602–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chessin DB, Hartley J, Cohen AM, et al. Rectus flap reconstruction decreases perineal wound complications after pelvic chemoradiation and surgery: a cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 2005;12:104–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Butler CE, Gundeslioglu AO, Rodriguez-Bigas MA. Outcomes of immediate vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstruction for irradiated abdominoperineal resection defects. J Am Coll Surg 2008;206:694–703.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barker T, Branagan G, Wright E, Crick A, McGuiness C, Chave H. Vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstruction of the perineal defect after abdominoperineal excision is associated with low morbidity. Colorect Dis 2013;15:1177–83.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chokshi RJ, Kuhrt MP, Arrese D, Martin EW, Jr. Reconstruction of total pelvic exenteration defects with rectus abdominus myocutaneous flaps versus primary closure. Am J Surg 2013;205:64–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Touny A, Othman H, Maamoon S, Ramzy S, Elmarakby H. Perineal reconstruction using pedicled vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (VRAM). J Surg Oncol 2014;110:752–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG. The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications. Annals of surgery 2009;250:177-86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al. (eds) (2010) Colon and rectum AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. Springer, New York pp. 143–164.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Horch RE, Hohenberger W, Eweida A, et al. A hundred patients with vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap for pelvic reconstruction after total pelvic exenteration. Int J Colorectal Dis 2014;29:813–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ansari N, Solomon MJ, Fisher RJ, et al. Acute adverse events and postoperative complications in a randomized trial of preoperative short-course radiotherapy versus long-course chemoradiotherapy for T3 adenocarcinoma of the rectum: Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group Trial (TROG 01.04). Ann Surg 2017;265:882–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pettersson D, Cedermark B, Holm T, et al. Interim analysis of the Stockholm III trial of preoperative radiotherapy regimens for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2010;97:580–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chadwick MA, Vieten D, Pettitt E, Dixon AR, Roe AM. Short course preoperative radiotherapy is the single most important risk factor for perineal wound complications after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. Colorectal Dis 2006;8:756–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marijnen CA, Kapiteijn E, van de Velde CJ, et al. Acute side effects and complications after short-term preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:817–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vermeer TA, Orsini RG, Daams F, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Rutten HJ. Anastomotic leakage and presacral abscess formation after locally advanced rectal cancer surgery: Incidence, risk factors and treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014;40:1502–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gabka CJ, Benhaim P, Mathes SJ, et al. An experimental model to determine the effect of irradiated tissue on neutrophil function. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;96:1676–88.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stapels DA, Geisbrecht BV, Rooijakkers SH. Neutrophil serine proteases in antibacterial defense. Curr Opin Microbiol 2015;23:42–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nelson RA, Butler CE. Surgical outcomes of VRAM versus thigh flaps for immediate reconstruction of pelvic and perineal cancer resection defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;123:175–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    O’Dowd V, Burke JP, Condon E, et al. Vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap and quality of life following abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: a multi-institutional study. Techn Coloproctol 2014;18:901–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shukla HS, Hughes LE. The rectus abdominis flap for perineal wounds. Ann Royal Coll Surg Engl 1984;66:337–9.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kroll SS, Pollock R, Jessup JM, Ota D. Transpelvic rectus abdominis flap reconstruction of defects following abdominal-perineal resection. Am Surg 1989;55:632–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Radice E, Nelson H, Mercill S, Farouk R, Petty P, Gunderson L. Primary myocutaneous flap closure following resection of locally advanced pelvic malignancies. Br J Surg 1999;86:349–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brodbeck R, Horch RE, Arkudas A, Beier JP. Plastic and reconstructive surgery in the treatment of oncological perineal and genital defects. Front Oncol 2015;5:212.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Horch RE, Hohenberger W, Weber K, Arkudas A, Beier JP. Myocutaneous transpelvic flaps do improve quality of life and help to reduce wound healing complications in patients receiving abdominoperineal resection in the real world. Int J Colorectal Dis 2016;31:1525–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Beier JP, Croner RS, Lang W, et al. Avoidance of complications in oncological surgery of the pelvic region: combined oncosurgical and plastic reconstruction measures [in German]. Chirurg 2015;86:242–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Prytz M, Angenete E, Bock D, Haglind E. Extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer—extensive surgery to be used with discretion based on 3-year local recurrence results: A Registry-based, Observational National Cohort Study. Ann Surg 2016;263:516–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Milan Spasojevic
    • 1
  • Anthony B. Mariathasan
    • 1
  • Mariusz Goscinski
    • 1
  • Ebbe B. Thorgersen
    • 1
  • Arne M. Solbakken
    • 1
  • Hans-Petter Gullestad
    • 2
  • Truls Ryder
    • 2
  • Kjersti Flatmark
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
  • Stein G. Larsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Norwegian Radium HospitalOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
  2. 2.Department of Plastic Surgery, The Norwegian Radium HospitalOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
  3. 3.Department of Tumor Biology, The Norwegian Radium HospitalOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
  4. 4.Institute of Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations