Advertisement

Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 25, Issue 5, pp 1133–1139 | Cite as

Recurrence-Free Survival After Resection of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Classified According to a Strict Definition of Tumor Rupture: A Population-Based Study

  • Toto Hølmebakk
  • Ivar Hompland
  • Bodil Bjerkehagen
  • Stephan Stoldt
  • Øyvind Sverre Bruland
  • Kirsten Sundby Hall
  • Kjetil Boye
Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas
  • 154 Downloads

Abstract

Background

In gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), rupture is a high-risk feature and an indication for adjuvant treatment; however, the independent impact of rupture on prognosis is uncertain and the term is inconsistently defined. In the present study, a previously proposed definition of ‘tumor rupture’ was applied on a population-based cohort of gastric GISTs.

Methods

Patients undergoing surgery for non-metastatic gastric GISTs from 2000 to 2015 were identified in the regional sarcoma database of Oslo University Hospital. Tumor rupture included spillage or fracture, piecemeal resection, incisional biopsy, blood-tinged ascites, gastric perforation, and microscopic adjacent infiltration. Minor defects of tumor integrity were not considered rupture, i.e. core needle biopsy, peritoneal tumor penetration, superficial peritoneal rupture, and R1 resection. Risk was assessed according to the modified National Institutes of Health consensus criteria.

Results

Among 242 patients, tumor rupture occurred in 22 patients and minor defects of tumor integrity occurred in 81 patients. Five-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) for patients with tumor rupture, minor defects of tumor integrity, and no defect was 37, 91, and 96%, respectively (p < 0.001). In the high-risk group, 5 year RFS for patients with rupture was 37%, versus 77% without rupture (hazard ratio 3.56, 95% confidence interval 1.57–8.08, p = 0.001). On multivariable analysis, tumor rupture and mitotic index were independently associated with recurrence. Of 13 patients who received adjuvant imatinib after tumor rupture, 11 relapsed.

Conclusions

Tumor rupture according to the present definition was independently associated with recurrence. With tumor rupture, patients relapsed despite adjuvant treatment. Without rupture, prognosis was good, even in the high-risk group.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to Ms. Trine Thoresen, administrator of the Sarcoma Database at OUH, for secretarial assistance, and Ms. Jeanne-Marie Berner, PhD, head of the Section for Molecular Pathology, for providing mutational data. In the present study, information from the Cancer Registry of Norway has been used. The interpretation and reporting of these data are the responsibility of the authors and no endorsement by the Cancer Registry of Norway should be inferred.

Funding

This work was supported by the Norwegian Cancer Society (Grant Number 5790283 to KB).

Disclosures

Toto Hølmebakk, Ivar Hompland, Bodil Bjerkehagen, Stephan Stoldt, Øyvind Sverre Bruland, Kirsten Sundby Hall, and Kjetil Boye declare no conflict of interests.

Supplementary material

10434_2018_6353_MOESM1_ESM.tif (1.7 mb)
Recurrence-free survival after complete resection of gastric GISTs. Kaplan–Meier survival curves of recurrence-free survival. a For the complete cohort; and b by the modified NIH criteria. GISTs gastrointestinal stromal tumors, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, NIH National Institutes of Health. aCalculated between intermediate- and high-risk tumors. Supplementary material 1 (TIFF 1746 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Hohenberger P, Ronellenfitsch U, Oladeji O, Pink D, Ströbel, Wardelmann E, Reichardt P. Pattern of recurrence in patients with ruptured primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Br J Surg 2010; 97(12):1854-1859.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Hall KS, et al. Risk factors for gastrointestinal stromal tumor recurrence in patients treated with adjuvant imatinib. Cancer 2014; 120(15):2325-2333.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yanagimoto Y, Takahashi T, Muguruma K, et al. Re-appraisal of risk classifications for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) after complete resection: indications for adjuvant therapy. Gastric Cancer 2014; 18(2):426-433.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Joensuu H. Risk stratification of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Hum Pathol 2008; 39(10):1411-1419.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fletcher CDM, Berman JJ, Corless C, et al. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach. Hum Pathol 2002; 33(5):459-465.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miettinen M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: review on morphology, molecular pathology, prognosis, and differential diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006; 130(10):1466-1478.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rutkowski P, Bylina E, Wozniak A, et al. Validation of the Joensuu risk criteria for primary resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumour: the impact of tumour rupture on patient outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol 2011; 37(10):890-896.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim M-C, Yook J-H, Yang H-K, et al. Long-Term Surgical Outcome of 1057 Gastric GISTs According to 7th UICC/AJCC TNM System. Medicine 2015; 94(41):e1526-e1527.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bischof DA, Kim Y, Dodson R, et al. Conditional disease-free survival after surgical resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. JAMA Surg 2015; 150(4):299–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wozniak A, Rutkowski P, Schoffski P, et al. Tumor genotype is an independent prognostic factor in primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors of gastric origin: a european multicenter analysis based on ConticaGIST. Clin Cancer Res 2014; 20(23):6105-6116.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Version 2.2017. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Available at: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp. Accessed 3 Mar 2017.
  12. 12.
    Hølmebakk T, Bjerkehagen B, Boye K, Bruland Ø, Stoldt S, Sundby Hall K. Definition and clinical significance of tumour rupture in gastrointestinal stromal tumours of the small intestine. Br J Surg 2016; 103:684–691.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    13. Joensuu H, Vehtari A, Riihimäki J, et al. Risk of recurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumour after surgery: an analysis of pooled population-based cohorts. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13(3):265-274.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PCW, Mertens F (eds) (2013) WHO Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone WHO/IARC Classification of tumours. 4th Edition, ARC, LyonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, et al. One vs three years of adjuvant imatinib for operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a randomized trial. JAMA 2012; 307(12):1265-1272.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rutkowski P, Nowecki ZI, Michej W, et al. Risk criteria and prognostic factors for predicting recurrences after resection of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14(7):2018-2027.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    The ESMO/European Sarcoma Network Working Group. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2014; 25:iii21-iii26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toto Hølmebakk
    • 1
  • Ivar Hompland
    • 2
    • 3
  • Bodil Bjerkehagen
    • 4
  • Stephan Stoldt
    • 1
  • Øyvind Sverre Bruland
    • 2
    • 3
  • Kirsten Sundby Hall
    • 2
  • Kjetil Boye
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Abdominal and Pediatric Surgery, Oslo University HospitalThe Norwegian Radium HospitalOsloNorway
  2. 2.Department of Oncology, Oslo University HospitalThe Norwegian Radium HospitalOsloNorway
  3. 3.Institute of Clinical MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  4. 4.Department of Pathology, Oslo University HospitalThe Norwegian Radium HospitalOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations