Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Role and Prognostic Significance of Aortopulmonary, Anterior Mediastinal, and Tracheobronchial Lymph Nodes in Esophageal Cancer: Update of the Eighth-Edition TNM Staging System (2018)

  • Thoracic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The eighth edition of TNM staging for esophageal cancer will be implemented at 2018. The stations 5, 6, and 10 lymph nodes (LNs) have been omitted from the regional lymph node map for the new TNM staging. However, the role and prognostic significance of these LN stations were not clear. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the revised nodal staging is appropriate and to verify the role, prognostic significance, and therapeutic value of these LNs in esophageal cancer.

Methods

The records of patients who underwent esophagectomy for cancer in our department between 2007 and 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. The rate of metastases was calculated for stations 5, 6, and 10 LNs. LN metastasis and patient survival were analyzed.

Results

A total of 1637 patients were included. The calculated rate of metastasis to stations 5, 6, and 10 was 3.2%, 2.3%, and 4.9%, respectively. No difference was found in the N stage determined by the seventh and eighth edition N staging systems. The status of station 5, 6, or 10 was not associated with long-term survival according to Cox proportional hazards model analysis.

Conclusions

Metastasis to stations 5, 6, or 10 LNs was infrequent. Omitting of stations 5, 6, and 10 LNs in the eighth edition TNM staging did not influence the accuracy and survival-predicting efficacy. The therapeutic value of lymphadenectomy of stations 5, 6, and 10 was limited. The status of stations 5, 6, and 10 LNs was not associated with long-term survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57(1):43–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Amin MB. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed. Chicago: Springer; 2017. p. 185–202.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Rice TW, Ishwaran H, Ferguson MK, Blackstone EH, Goldstraw P. Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: an eighth edition staging primer. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12(1):36–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(6):1471–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Niwa Y, Koike M, Hattori M, et al. The prognostic relevance of subcarinal lymph node dissection in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(2):611–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ding X, Zhang J, Li B, et al. A meta-analysis of lymph node metastasis rate for patients with thoracic oesophageal cancer and its implication in delineation of clinical target volume for radiation therapy. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1019):e1110–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sasako M, McCulloch P, Kinoshita T, Maruyama K. New method to evaluate the therapeutic value of lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 1995;82(3):346–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. El-Sherief AH, Lau CT, Wu CC, Drake RL, Abbott GF, Rice TW. International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) lymph node map: radiologic review with CT illustration. Radiographics. 2014;34(6):1680–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rice TW, Blackstone EH. Esophageal cancer staging: past, present, and future. Thorac Surg Clin. 2013;23(4):461–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mehta SP, Jose P, Mirza A, Pritchard SA, Hayden JD, Grabsch HI. Comparison of the prognostic value of the 6th and 7th editions of the Union for International Cancer Control TNM staging system in patients with lower esophageal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. Dis Esophagus. 2013;26(2):182–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Talsma K, van Hagen P, Grotenhuis BA, Steyerberg EW, Tilanus HW, van Lanschot JJ, Wijnhoven BP. Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the UICC-AJCC TNM classification for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(7):2142–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bendzsak A, Oliveira R, Goudie E, Thiffault V, Jouquan A, Ferraro P, Liberman M. Evaluation of the mediastinum: differentiating between stations 4L, 5, and 6 using EBUS and EUS. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103(2):e219–e21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rice TW, Apperson-Hansen C, DiPaola LM, et al. Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration: clinical staging data. Dis Esophagus. 2016;29(7):707–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hu Y, Hu C, Zhang H, Ping Y, Chen LQ. How does the number of resected lymph nodes influence TNM staging and prognosis for esophageal carcinoma? Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(3):784–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Akiyama H, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H, Kajiyama Y. Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg. 1994;220(3):364–72 (discussion 72–3).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Li B, Chen H, Xiang J, Zhang Y, Kong Y, Garfield DH, Li H. Prevalence of lymph node metastases in superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;146(5):1198–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. De Manzoni G, Pedrazzani C, Verlato G, Roviello F, Pasini F, Pugliese R, Cordiano C. Comparison of old and new TNM systems for nodal staging in adenocarcinoma of the gastro-oesophageal junction. Br J Surg. 2004;91(3):296–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Peng J, Wang WP, Yuan Y, Hu Y, Wang Y, Chen LQ. Optimal extent of lymph node dissection for Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100(1):263–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rice TW, Ishwaran H, Hofstetter WL, et al. Esophageal cancer: associations with (pN+) lymph node metastases. Ann Surg. 2017;265(1):122–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lagergren J, Mattsson F, Zylstra J, et al. Extent of lymphadenectomy and prognosis after esophageal cancer surgery. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(1):32–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rizk NP, Ishwaran H, Rice TW, et al. Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2010;251(1):46–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Miyata H, Yamasaki M, Makino T, et al. Therapeutic value of lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112(1):60–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hsu PK, Huang CS, Hsieh CC, et al. Role of right upper mediastinal lymph node metastasis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after tri-incisional esophagectomies. Surgery. 2014;156(5):1269–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

All authors thank Dr. Ivy Cauzon for her help with the English editing.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Long-Qi Chen MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, WP., Ni, PZ., Yang, YS. et al. The Role and Prognostic Significance of Aortopulmonary, Anterior Mediastinal, and Tracheobronchial Lymph Nodes in Esophageal Cancer: Update of the Eighth-Edition TNM Staging System (2018). Ann Surg Oncol 26, 1005–1011 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-07086-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-07086-w

Keywords

Navigation