Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 829–836 | Cite as

Anterolateral Thigh Flap Combined with Reconstruction Plate Versus Double Free Flaps for Composite Mandibular Reconstruction: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

  • Anaeze C. OffodileII
  • Jennifer An-Jou Lin
  • Kai-Ping Chang
  • Mohamed Abdelrahman
  • Hao-Wei Kou
  • Charles Yuen Yung Loh
  • Mario A. Aycart
  • Huang-Kai Kao
Reconstructive Oncology

Abstract

Objective

This study was designed to examine the comparative effectiveness of oromandibular defect reconstruction via anterolateral thigh flap and bridging plate (ALT only) versus simultaneous soft tissue and vascularized bone flap (DFF), with regards to long-term plate exposure and complications.

Methods

A propensity score-matched analysis of patients with an oncologic head and neck defect who underwent microvascular reconstruction was performed. Two surgical groups, i.e., ALT only and DFF, were created. Incidence and subsequent management strategies for postoperative plate exposure were evaluated along with complications, overall survival, and postoperative quality of life (QoL).

Results

Sixty-two patients were 1:1 propensity matched (31 per group). The DFF group had a significantly larger soft tissue and bone defect than the single-flap group. The 5-year probability of not having a plate exposure was 45.5 and 47.4% for the double-flaps and single-flap groups, respectively (p = 0.186). The ALT-only group had a significantly higher rate of wound infections (38.7% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.02). The incidence of flap loss, reexploration, inpatient mortality, plate fracture, medical complications, and overall survival were not significantly different. Although mean score for pain was significantly worse in the ALT-only group (75.2 vs. 88.5, p < 0.001), the remainder of our QoL assessments (cosmesis, swallow, employment, and speech) were comparable.

Conclusions

The utilization of an ALT with plate strategy is associated with competitive rates of plate exposure and overall survival relative to DFF but higher wound infections and long-term pain. These results have considerable salience for patient-counseling regarding expectations for functional and clinical outcomes.

Notes

Disclosure

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Wei FC, Celik N, Chen HC, Cheng MH, Huang WC. Combined anterolateral thigh flap and vascularized fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap in reconstruction of extensive composite mandibular defects. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    van Gemert J, Holtslag I, van der Bilt A, Merkx M, Koole R, Van Cann E. Health-related quality of life after segmental resection of the lateral mandible: Free fibula flap versus plate reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofacial Surg. 2015;43:658–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hidalgo DA. Fibula free flap: a new method of mandible reconstruction. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 1989;84:71–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hidalgo DA. Fibula free flap mandibular reconstruction. Clin Plastic Surg. 1994;21:25–35.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hidalgo DA. Fibula free flap mandible reconstruction. Microsurgery. 1994;15:238–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Daniel RK. Reconstruction of mandibular defects with revascularized free rib grafts. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 1978;62:775–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Daniel RK. Mandibular reconstruction with free tissue transfers. Ann Plastic Surg. 1978;1:346–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wei FC, Celik N, Yang WG, Chen IH, Chang YM, Chen HC. Complications after reconstruction by plate and soft-tissue free flap in composite mandibular defects and secondary salvage reconstruction with osteocutaneous flap. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chim H, Salgado CJ, Mardini S, Chen HC. Reconstruction of mandibular defects. Sem Plastic Surg. 2010;24:188–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fanzio PM, Chang KP, Chen HH, et al. Plate exposure after anterolateral thigh free-flap reconstruction in head and neck cancer patients with composite mandibular defects. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3055–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blackwell KE, Lacombe V. The bridging lateral mandibular reconstruction plate revisited. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;125:988–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    van Minnen B, Nauta JM, Vermey A, Bos RR, Roodenburg JL. Long-term functional outcome of mandibular reconstruction with stainless steel AO reconstruction plates. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;40:144–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goh BT, Lee S, Tideman H, Stoelinga PJ. Mandibular reconstruction in adults: a review. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 2008;37:597–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Head C, Alam D, Sercarz JA, et al. Microvascular flap reconstruction of the mandible: a comparison of bone grafts and bridging plates for restoration of mandibular continuity. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:48–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Coletti DP, Ord R, Liu X. Mandibular reconstruction and second generation locking reconstruction plates: outcome of 110 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38:960–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Okura M, Isomura ET, Iida S, Kogo M. Long-term outcome and factors influencing bridging plates for mandibular reconstruction. Oral Oncol. 2005;41:791–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boyd JB, Mulholland RS, Davidson J, et al. The free flap and plate in oromandibular reconstruction: long-term review and indications. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 1995;95:1018–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heller KS, Dubner S, Keller A. Long-term evaluation of patients undergoing immediate mandibular reconstruction. Am J Surg. 1995;170:517–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ryu JK, Stern RL, Robinson MG, et al. Mandibular reconstruction using a titanium plate: the impact of radiation therapy on plate preservation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;32:627–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Poli T, Ferrari S, Bianchi B, Sesenna E. Primary oromandibular reconstruction using free flaps and thorp plates in cancer patients: a 5-year experience. Head Neck. 2003;25:15–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee JT, Hsu H, Wang CH, et al. Reconstruction of extensive composite oromandibular defects with simultaneous free anterolateral thigh fasciocutaneous and fibular osteocutaneous flaps. J Reconstruct Microsurg. 2010;26:145–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ao M, Asagoe K, Maeta M, Nakagawa F, Saito R, Nagase Y. Combined anterior thigh flaps and vascularised fibular graft for reconstruction of massive composite oromandibular defects. Br J Plastic Surg. 1998;51:350–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:1245–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jewer DD, Boyd JB, Manktelow RT, et al. Orofacial and mandibular reconstruction with the iliac crest free flap: a review of 60 cases and a new method of classification. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 1989;84:391–403 (discussion 4–5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lee YH, Lai YH, Yueh B, et al. Validation of the University of Washington Quality of Life Chinese Version (UWQOL-C) for head and neck cancer patients in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2017;116(4):249–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rubin DB. Propensity score methods. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149:7–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Miyamoto S, Sakuraba M, Nagamatsu S, Kamizono K, Hayashi R. Comparison of reconstruction plate and double flap for reconstruction of an extensive mandibular defect. Microsurgery. 2012;32:452–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Urken ML, Buchbinder D, Costantino PD, et al. Oromandibular reconstruction using microvascular composite flaps: report of 210 cases. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:46–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schultz BD, Sosin M, Nam A, et al. Classification of mandible defects and algorithm for microvascular reconstruction. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:743e–54e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Urken ML, Weinberg H, Vickery C, Buchbinder D, Lawson W, Biller HF. Oromandibular reconstruction using microvascular composite free flaps. Report of 71 cases and a new classification scheme for bony, soft-tissue, and neurologic defects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117:733–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hidalgo DA, Pusic AL. Free-flap mandibular reconstruction: a 10-year follow-up study. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:438–49; (discussion 50–51).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kademani D, Mardini S, Moran SL. Reconstruction of head and neck defects: a systematic approach to treatment. Sem Plastic Surg. 2008;22:141–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Scheerlinck LM, Muradin MS, van der Bilt A, Meijer GJ, Koole R, Van Cann EM. Donor site complications in bone grafting: comparison of iliac crest, calvarial, and mandibular ramus bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28:222–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mariani PB, Kowalski LP, Magrin J. Reconstruction of large defects postmandibulectomy for oral cancer using plates and myocutaneous flaps: a long-term follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;35:427–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nicholson RE, Schuller DE, Forrest LA, Mountain RE, Ali T, Young D. Factors involved in long- and short-term mandibular plate exposure. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123:217–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cohen WA, Albornoz CR, Cordeiro PG, et al. Health-related quality of life following reconstruction for common head and neck surgical defects. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2016;138:1312–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anaeze C. OffodileII
    • 1
  • Jennifer An-Jou Lin
    • 2
  • Kai-Ping Chang
    • 3
  • Mohamed Abdelrahman
    • 4
  • Hao-Wei Kou
    • 2
  • Charles Yuen Yung Loh
    • 2
  • Mario A. Aycart
    • 5
  • Huang-Kai Kao
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Plastic SurgeryMD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial HospitalChang Gung University College of MedicineTaoyuanTaiwan
  3. 3.Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial HospitalChang Gung University College of MedicineTaoyuanTaiwan
  4. 4.Department of Surgery, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of KhartoumKhartoumSudan
  5. 5.Department of SurgeryBrigham and Women’s HospitalBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations