Flat Epithelial Atypia on Core Biopsy and Upgrade to Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- 442 Downloads
No consensus exists on whether flat epithelial atypia (FEA) diagnosed percutaneously should be surgically excised. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the frequency of upgrade to cancer or an atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) at surgical excision of FEA was performed.
Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from January 2003 to November 2015 were searched. The inclusion criteria required a manuscript in English with original data on FEA diagnosed percutaneously, data including the presence or absence of other concurrent high-risk lesions, and data including outcome of cancer at surgical excision. Studies were assessed for quality, and two reviewers extracted data. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool estimates. The impact of study-level characteristics was assessed by stratified meta-analysis and meta-regression.
The inclusion criteria was met by 32 studies. A total of 1966 core needle biopsies showed pure FEA, and 1517 (77%) showed surgical excision. The proportions of patients with upgrade to cancer varied from 0 to 42%, with an overall pooled estimate of 11.1%. Heterogeneity was observed, with the greatest impact based on whether a study included cases of FEA diagnosed before 2003. With restriction of the investigation to 16 higher-quality studies, the cancer upgrade pooled estimate was 7.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.4–10.4%), and the rate of invasive cancer was 3% (95% CI 1.9–4.5%). For upgrade to ADH, data from 22 studies including 937 patients were analyzed. The proportion of patients upgraded to ADH ranged from 0 to 60%, with a pooled estimate of 17.9% overall and 18.6% among high-quality studies.
With patient management change potential for approximately 25% of patients, this analysis supports a general recommendation for surgical excision of FEA diagnosed by core biopsy.
We sincerely thank to Marilyn Churchward for assistance with manuscript preparation.
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
- 2.Tavassoli FA, Hoefler H, Rosai JH, Ellis RIO. Intraductal proliferative lesions. In: Tavassoli FA, Devilee P, editors. World Health Organization classification of tumours: pathology and genetics of tumours of the breast and female genital organs. Lyon: IARC Press; 2003, pp 63–73.Google Scholar
- 9.Schwarzer G, Carpenter JR, Rucker G. META: general package for meta-analysis. R Package Version 4.3-2. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015.Google Scholar
- 11.National Comprehensive Cancer Center. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Guidelines, Breast Cancer Risk Reduction, v1, 2017. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/breast_risk.pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2016.
- 19.King TA, Pilewskie M, Muhsen S, et al. Lobular carcinoma in situ: a 29-year longitudinal experience evaluating clinicopathologic features and breast cancer risk. J Clin Oncol. 2015;333945–52.Google Scholar
- 30.Tomasino RM, Morello V, Gullo A, et al. Assessment of “grading” with Ki-67 and c-kit immunohistochemical expressions may be a helpful tool in management of patients with flat epithelial atypia (FEA) and columnar cell lesions (CCLs) on core breast biopsy. J Cell Physiol. 2009;221:343–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar