Advertisement

Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 24, Issue 12, pp 3596–3603 | Cite as

Predictors of Bowel Function in Long-term Rectal Cancer Survivors with Anastomosis

  • Mubarika Alavi
  • Christopher S. Wendel
  • Robert S. Krouse
  • Larissa Temple
  • Mark C. Hornbrook
  • Joanna E. Bulkley
  • Carmit K. McMullen
  • Marcia Grant
  • Lisa J. Herrinton
Colorectal Cancer

Abstract

Background

Bowel function in long-term rectal cancer survivors with anastomosis has not been characterized adequately. We hypothesized that bowel function is associated with patient, disease, and treatment characteristics.

Methods

The cohort study included Kaiser Permanente members who were long-term (≥5 years) rectal cancer survivors with anastomosis. Bowel function was scored using the self-administered, 14-item Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Bowel Function Index. Patient, cancer, and treatment variables were collected from the electronic medical chart. We used multiple regression to assess the relationship of patient- and treatment-related variables with the bowel function score.

Results

The study included 381 anastomosis patients surveyed an average 12 years after their rectal cancer surgeries. The total bowel function score averaged 53 (standard deviation, 9; range, 31–70, higher scores represent better function). Independent factors associated with worse total bowel function score included receipt of radiation therapy (yes vs. no: 5.3-unit decrement, p < 0.0001), tumor distance from the anal verge (≤6 cm vs. >6 cm: 3.2-unit decrement, p < 0.01), and history of a temporary ostomy (yes vs. no: 4.0-unit decrement, p < 0.01). One factor measured at time of survey was also associated with worse total bowel function score: ever smoking (2.3-unit decrement, p < 0.05). The regression model explained 20% of the variation in the total bowel function score.

Conclusions

Low tumor location, radiation therapy, temporary ostomy during initial treatment, and history of smoking were linked with decreased long-term bowel function following an anastomosis. These results should improve decision-making about surgical options.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mary Wagner, Administrative Assistant, University of Arizona Cancer Center, for help with this work.

Funding

Supported by Grant R01 CA106912, “Health-Related Quality of Life in Colorectal Cancer Survivors With Stomas,” from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, in collaboration with resources and the use of facilities provided at the Southern Arizona Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Tucson, Arizona, and Kaiser Permanente.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the University of Arizona or Kaiser Permanente.

Disclosures

Dr. Herrinton has had research contracts in the past 3 years with MedImmune that was unrelated to this study. The other authors have no disclosures.

Ethical Approval

All studies were approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the University of Arizona and Kaiser Permanente.

References

  1. 1.
    American Cancer Society, Fact Sheet Colorectal Cancer Facts & Figures 2011–2013, http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/document/acspc-028312.pdf. Accessed 29 Jun 2016.
  2. 2.
    Altekruse S, Kosary C, Krapcho M, et al. SEER cancer statistics review 1975–2007. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute (2010).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kosinski L, Habr-Gama A, Ludwig K, Perez R. Shifting concepts in rectal cancer management: a review of contemporary primary rectal cancer treatment strategies. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(3):173–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Juul T, Ahlberg M, Biondo S, et al. Low anterior resection syndrome and quality of life: an international multicenter study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57:585–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S. Bowel dysfunction after treatment for rectal cancer. Acta Oncol. 2008;47:994–1003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S. Rectal Cancer Function Study Group. Impact of bowel dysfunction on quality of life after sphincter-preserving resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1377–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lai X, Wong FK, Ching SS. Review of bowel dysfunction of rectal cancer patients during the first five years after sphincter-preserving surgery: a population in need of nursing attention. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013;17:681–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen TY, Wiltink LM, Nout RA, et al. Bowel function 14 years after preoperative short-course radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2015;14:106–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Desnoo L, Faithfull S. A qualitative study of anterior resection syndrome: the experiences of cancer survivors who have undergone resection surgery. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2006;15:244–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Knowles, G, Haigh R, McLean C, et al. Long term effect of surgery and radiotherapy for colorectal cancer on defecatory function and quality of life, Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013;17(5):570–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pucciarelli S, Del Bianco P, Efficace F, et al. Health-related quality of life, faecal continence and bowel function in rectal cancer patients after chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18:601–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wells CI, Vather R, Chu MJ, Robertson JP, Bissett IP. Anterior resection syndrome—a risk factor analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19:350–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Herrinton LJ, Altschuler A, McMullen CK, et al. Conversations for providers caring for patients with rectal cancer: comparison of long-term patient-centered outcomes for patients with low rectal cancer facing ostomy or sphincter-sparing surgery. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016. Doi:  10.3322/caac.21345.
  14. 14.
    Wendel CS, Grant M, Herrinton L, et al. Reliability and validity of a survey to measure bowel function and quality of life in long-term rectal cancer survivors. Qual Life Res. 2014;23:2831–40.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sun V, Grant M, Wendel CS, et al. Dietary and behavioral adjustments to manage bowel dysfunction after surgery in long-term colorectal cancer survivors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(13):4317–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Temple LK, Bacik J, Savatta SG, et al. The development of a validated instrument to evaluate bowel function after sphincterpreserving surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1353–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grant M, Ferrell B, Dean G, et al. Revision and psychometric testing of the City of Hope Quality of Life—Ostomy Questionnaire. Qual Life Res. 2004;13:1445–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ware JE, Kosinski M, Turner-Bowker DM, Gandek B. SF-12v2™: How to score version 2 of the SF-12® health survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated, 2002.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(6):613–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kenig J, Richter P. Definition of the rectum and level of the peritoneal reflection—still a matter of debate? Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2013;8:183–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fincham JE. Response rates and responsiveness for surveys, standards and the journal. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(2):43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Downing A, Morris EJ, Richards M, et al. Health-related quality of life after colorectal cancer in England: a patient-reported outcomes study of individuals 12–36 months after diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:616–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lange MM, den Dulk M, Bossema ER, et al. Risk factors for fecal incontinence after rectal cancer treatment. Brit J Surg 2007;94;1278–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S. Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2012;255:922–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ekkarat P, Boonpipattanapong T, Tantiphlachiva K, Sangkhathat S. Factors determining low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer resection: a study in Thai patients. Asian J Surg. 2015 Doi:  10.1016/j.asjsur.2015.07.003
  26. 26.
    Bregendahl S, Emmertsen KJ, Lous J, Laurberg S. Bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection with and without neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: a population-based cross-sectional study. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15:1130–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    De Bruin AF, Schouten SB, de Kort PP, Gosselink MP, van der Harst E. The impact of chronic smoking on rectal mucosal blood flow. Tech Coloproctol. 2009;13(4):269–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mubarika Alavi
    • 1
  • Christopher S. Wendel
    • 2
  • Robert S. Krouse
    • 3
  • Larissa Temple
    • 4
  • Mark C. Hornbrook
    • 5
  • Joanna E. Bulkley
    • 5
  • Carmit K. McMullen
    • 5
  • Marcia Grant
    • 6
  • Lisa J. Herrinton
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of ResearchKaiser Permanente Northern CaliforniaOaklandUSA
  2. 2.University of Arizona College of MedicineTucsonUSA
  3. 3.CMC Veterans Affairs Medical CenterPhiladelphiaUSA
  4. 4.University of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterUSA
  5. 5.Kaiser Permanente Center for Health ResearchPortlandUSA
  6. 6.City of Hope/Beckman Research InstituteDuarteUSA

Personalised recommendations