Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic Right Hepatectomy for Cirrhotic Patients: Takasaki’s Hilar Control and Caudal Approach

  • Original Article – Hepatobiliary Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Cirrhotic patients bearing hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) derive benefits from laparoscopic hepatectomy1 6 such as reduced bleeding, less overall and liver-specific complications, and fewer adhesions in the case of future reoperation or transplantation.7 10 Bleeding is concerning in the setting of cirrhosis,11 15 and adequate inflow control reduces blood loss. The caudal approach is the laparoscopic counterpart of the anterior approach to open surgery. It implies in parenchymal transection initiated from the visceral surface of the liver after limited hepatic mobilization, reducing the risk of increased circulating tumoral cells.16 18 Venous outflow transection and completion of ligament mobilization are left as last steps.

Methods

A 46 years-old-male with hepatitis C virus and alcoholic cirrhosis was diagnosed with a 4-cm HCC (right hepatic lobe). Expected future liver remnant was 45 % of his total liver volume. A totally laparoscopic right hepatectomy was performed using six ports, and the specimen was removed through a Pfannenstiel auxiliary incision. A 10-mm 30° scope was used. The pneumoperitoneum pressure was set to 12 mmHg. The right hepatic pedicle, the caudate lobe, and the major hepatic veins were managed with laparoscopic vascular staplers.

Results

Surgery was performed with limited liver mobilization and en bloc extrafascial right pedicle control (Takasaki’s technique),19 followed by caudal parenchymal transection along the paracaval plane. The operative time was 450 min, and the estimated blood loss was 800 ml (no transfusion was required).

Conclusion

The laparoscopic Takasaki technique and caudal approach are feasible procedures in the setting of cirrhosis, resulting in an oncologic adequate intervention with less morbidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhou Y-M, Shao W-Y, Zhao Y-F, Xu D-H, Li B. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56:1937–43. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1572-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fancellu A, Rosman AS, Sanna V, et al. Meta-analysis of trials comparing minimally invasive and open liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Surg Res. 2011;171:e33–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.07.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Li N, Wu Y-R, Wu B, Lu M-Q. Surgical and oncologic outcomes following laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Hepatol Res. 2012;42:51–9. doi:10.1111/j.1872-034X.2011.00890.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Xiong J-J, Altaf K, Javed MA, et al. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:6657–68. doi:10.3748/wjg.v18.i45.6657.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Yin Z, Fan X, Ye H, Yin D, Wang J. Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;20:1203–15. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2705-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Twaij A, Pucher P, Sodergren M. Laparoscopic vs open approach to resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with known cirrhosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:8274–81. doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8274.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Laurent A, Tayar C, Andréoletti M, Lauzet J-Y, Merle J-C, Cherqui D. Laparoscopic liver resection facilitates salvage liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16:310–4. doi:10.1007/s00534-009-0063-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Belli G, Cioffi L, Fantini C, et al. Laparoscopic redo surgery for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: feasibility, safety, and results. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1807–11. doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0344-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dagher I, Belli G, Fantini C, et al. Laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a European experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211:16–23. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.03.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kanazawa A, Tsukamoto T, Shimizu S, et al. Laparoscopic liver resection for treating recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20:512–7. doi:10.1007/s00534-012-0592-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamamoto J, Kosuge T, Takayama T, et al. Perioperative blood transfusion promotes recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy. Surgery. 1994;115:303–9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8128355. Accessed 22 Jan 2016.

  12. Kwon AH, Matsui Y, Kamiyama Y. Perioperative blood transfusion in hepatocellular carcinomas: influence of immunologic profile and recurrence-free survival. Cancer. 2001;91:771–8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11241245. Accessed 22 Jan 2016.

  13. Katz SC, Shia J, Liau KH, et al. Operative blood loss independently predicts recurrence and survival after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2009;249:617–23. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819ed22f.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Aramaki O, Takayama T, Higaki T, et al. Decreased blood loss reduces postoperative complications in resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014;21:585–91. doi:10.1002/jhbp.101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Harada N, Shirabe K, Maeda T. Blood transfusion is associated with recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy in Child–Pugh class A patients. World J Surg. 2015;1044–51. doi:10.1007/s00268-014-2891-6.

  16. Liu CL, Fan ST, Cheung ST, Lo CM, Ng IO, Wong J. Anterior approach versus conventional approach right hepatic resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2006;244:194–203. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000225095.18754.45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Schmidt T, Koch M, Antolovic D, et al. Influence of two different resection techniques (conventional liver resection versus anterior approach) of liver metastases from colorectal cancer on hematogenous tumor cell dissemination: prospective randomized multicenter trial. BMC Surg. 2008;8:6. doi:10.1186/1471-2482-8-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Takahashi M, Wakabayashi G, Nitta H, et al. Pure laparoscopic right hepatectomy by anterior approach with hanging maneuver for large intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:4732–3. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-3202-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Takasaki K. Glissonean pedicle transection method for hepatic resection: a new concept of liver segmentation. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 1998;5:286–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaime Arthur Pirola Krüger MD.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 236175 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krüger, J.A. ., Fonseca, G.M., Coelho, F.F. et al. Laparoscopic Right Hepatectomy for Cirrhotic Patients: Takasaki’s Hilar Control and Caudal Approach. Ann Surg Oncol 24, 558–559 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5288-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5288-y

Navigation