Late Axillary Recurrence After Negative Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy is Uncommon
- 504 Downloads
This study was designed to determine the incidence of late axillary recurrence (AR) in patients with negative sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and provide a comparison with SLNB positive patients who underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND).
Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on all breast cancer patients with negative SLNB from January 1997 to December 2000 was performed on a large, institutional database. Primary outcome was cumulative incidence of AR as a first event with/without concurrent local recurrence. SLNB positive patients who went on to ALND during the same timeframe were comparatively analyzed.
A total of 1529 eligible patients were identified (median age 58 years, median tumor size 1.0 cm): 1297 (85 %) underwent lumpectomy; 1099 (75 %) received adjuvant radiation; and 874 (80 %) were estrogen receptor-positive. At 10.8 (range 0–16) years median follow-up, overall incidence of AR as a first event was low (n = 13). Cumulative incidence was 0.6 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.2–0.9] 5 years after SLNB, and 0.9 % (95 % CI 0.4–1.4, 95 % CI 0.5–1.6) at 10 and 15 years. Late AR (>5 years after surgery) occurred in five patients. Median overall survival after AR was 4.6 years; median distant disease-free survival after AR was 3.8 years. Late AR was also low in a contemporaneous group of SLNB positive patients undergoing ALND. In this group, cumulative incidence of AR was 0.7 % (95 % CI 0.1–1.3) 5 years after surgery, and 0.8 % (95 % CI 0.2–1.5) at 10 and 15 years.
Late AR after negative SLNB is rare; the majority of ARs are in the first 5 years after surgery. Prognosis after these events is poor. SLNB remains a safe and effective procedure for axillary evaluation in breast cancer.
KeywordsSentinel Node Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Axillary Recurrence Negative Sentinel Lymph Node
Funded in part by NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant No. P30 CA008748.
The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.
- 1.Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(10):927–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 5.Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, et al. Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(10):881–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Breast Cancer. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp. Accessed 26 Feb 2016.
- 18.Donker M, van Tienhoven G, Straver ME, et al. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):1303–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 24.Tanis E, van de Velde CJ, Bartelink H, van de Vijver MJ, Putter H, van der Hage JA. Locoregional recurrence after breast-conserving therapy remains an independent prognostic factor even after an event free interval of 10 years in early stage breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(12):1751–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar