Advertisement

Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 1360–1365 | Cite as

Surgeon-Performed Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology of Head and Neck Mass Lesions: Sampling Adequacy and Diagnostic Accuracy

  • Dongbin Ahn
  • Heejin Kim
  • Jin Ho Sohn
  • Jae Hyuk Choi
  • Kyung Jin Na
Head and Neck Oncology

Abstract

Background

Studies of surgeon-performed ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (US-FNAC) have been limited largely to thyroid nodules. This study evaluated the sampling adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of surgeon-performed US-FNAC for a large range of head and neck mass lesions, including lesions of the thyroid, salivary glands, and lymph nodes.

Methods

The study included 617 cases of US-FNAC performed by a single surgeon between 2009 and 2013. Their medical histories and ultrasound (US) findings were retrospectively reviewed. Sample adequacy was analyzed according to the surgeon’s experience, anatomic tumor location, and US tumor characteristics. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy of FNAC were calculated after correlation with the surgical histopathologic results.

Results

The overall adequacy rate for surgeon-performed US-FNAC was 91.9 % (567/617). Inadequate specimens were obtained from 9.7 % (29/282) of the thyroid glands, 6.1 % of the salivary glands (6/98), and 6.3 % (15/237) of the lymph nodes. The effect of the surgeon’s experience plateaued (inadequate sampling rate, 6–8 %) after 100 US-FNAC procedures. Inadequate sampling was associated with tumor characteristics such as cystic change and rim calcification. Overall, US-FNAC showed a sensitivity of 88.2 %, a specificity of 98.2 %, a PPV of 98.5 %, an NPV of 85.7 %, and a diagnostic accuracy of 91.6 %.

Conclusion

With proper training and experience managing at least 100 US-FNAC cases, surgeons can ensure a low inadequate sampling rate and good diagnostic accuracy for a range of head and neck mass lesions.

Keywords

Salivary Gland Positive Predictive Value Negative Predictive Value Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Thyroid Nodule 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Conflict of interest

None.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (WMV 6088 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Cannon CR, Replogle WH. Fine-needle aspiration: survey of clinical utility. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;123:563–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Robitschek J, Straub M, Wirtz E, Klem C, Sniezek J. Diagnostic efficacy of surgeon-performed ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration: a randomized controlled trial. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;142:306–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Danese D, Sciacchitano S, Farsetti A, Andreoli M, Pontecorvi A. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional versus sonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules. Thyroid. 1998;8:15–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Seiberling KA, Dutra JC, Gunn J. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules performed in the office. Laryngoscope. 2008;118:228–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Milas M, Stephen A, Berber E, Wagner K, Miskulin J, Siperstein A. Ultrasonography for the endocrine surgeon: a valuable clinical tool that enhances diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes. Surgery. 2005;138:1193–200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bhatki AM, Brewer B, Robinson-Smith T, Nikiforov Y, Steward DL. Adequacy of surgeon-performed ultrasound-guided thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;139:27–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bohacek L, Milas M, Mitchell J, Siperstein A, Berber E. Diagnostic accuracy of surgeon-performed ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:45–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karadeniz Cakmak G, Emre AU, Tascilar O, Gultekin FA, Ozdamar SO, Comert M. Diagnostic adequacy of surgeon-performed ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules. J Surg Oncol. 2013;107:206–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Al-azawi D, Mann GB, Judson RT, Miller JA. Endocrine surgeon-performed US-guided thyroid FNAC is accurate and efficient. World J Surg. 2012;36:1947–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mittendorf EA, Tamarkin SW, McHenry CR. The results of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy for evaluation of nodular thyroid disease. Surgery. 2002;132:648–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tandon S, Shahab R, Benton JI, Ghosh SK, Sheard J, Jones TM. Fine-needle aspiration cytology in a regional head and neck cancer center: comparison with a systematic review and meta-analysis. Head Neck. 2008;30:1246–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McIvor NP, Freeman JL, Salem S, Elden L, Noyek AM, Bedard YC. Ultrasonography and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of head and neck lesions: a surgical perspective. Laryngoscope. 1994;104:669–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kelly NP, Lim JC, DeJong S, Harmath C, Dudiak C, Wojcik EM. Specimen adequacy and diagnostic specificity of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirations of nonpalpable thyroid nodules. Diagn Cytopathol. 2006;34:188–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ali SZ. Thyroid cytopathology: Bethesda and beyond. Acta Cytol. 2011;55:4–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Garcia-Pascual L, Barahona MJ, Balsells M, et al. Complex thyroid nodules with nondiagnostic fine-needle aspiration cytology: histopathologic outcomes and comparison of the cytologic variants (cystic vs acellular). Endocrine. 2011;39:33–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grani G, Calvanese A, Carbotta G, et al. Intrinsic factors affecting adequacy of thyroid nodule fine-needle aspiration cytology. Clin Endocrinol Oxford. 2013;78:141–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heller KS, Dubner S, Chess Q, Attie JN. Value of fine-needle aspiration biopsy of salivary gland masses in clinical decision making. Am J Surg. 1992;164:667–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zbaren P, Schar C, Hotz MA, Loosli H. Value of fine-needle aspiration cytology of parotid gland masses. Laryngoscope. 2001;111:1989–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stanley MW. Selected problems in fine-needle aspiration of head and neck masses. Mod Pathol. 2002;15:342–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Douville NJ, Bradford CR. Comparison of ultrasound-guided core biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of salivary gland lesions. Head Neck. 2013;35:1657–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Breeze J, Andi A, Williams MD, Howlett DC. The use of fine-needle core biopsy under ultrasound guidance in the diagnosis of a parotid mass. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;47:78–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schmidt RL, Hall BJ, Layfield LJ. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy for salivary gland lesions. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;136:516–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Herd MK, Woods M, Anand R, Habib A, Brennan PA. Lymphoma presenting in the neck: current concepts in diagnosis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;50:309–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Roh JL, Lee YW, Kim JM. Clinical utility of fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of head and neck lymphoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:817–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hehn ST, Grogan TM, Miller TP. Utility of fine-needle aspiration as a diagnostic technique in lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3046–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dongbin Ahn
    • 1
  • Heejin Kim
    • 1
  • Jin Ho Sohn
    • 1
  • Jae Hyuk Choi
    • 1
  • Kyung Jin Na
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck SurgeryKyungpook National UniversityDaeguKorea

Personalised recommendations