Advertisement

Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 21, Issue 10, pp 3342–3347 | Cite as

Implementing a Screening Tool for Identifying Patients at Risk for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: A Statewide Initiative

  • L. Brannon Traxler
  • Monique L. Martin
  • Alice S. Kerber
  • Cecelia A. Bellcross
  • Barbara E. Crane
  • Victoria Green
  • Roland Matthews
  • Nancy M. Paris
  • Sheryl G. A. Gabram
Breast Oncology

Abstract

Background

The Georgia Breast Cancer Genomic Health Consortium is a partnership created with funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to the Georgia Department of Public Health to reduce cancer disparities among high-risk minority women. The project addresses young women at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome through outreach efforts.

Methods

The consortium provides education and collects surveillance data using the breast cancer genetics referral screening tool (B-RST) available at www.BreastCancerGeneScreen.org. The HBOC educational protocol was presented to 73 staff in 6 public health centers. Staff used the tool during the collection of medical history. Further family history assessments and testing for mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes were facilitated if appropriate.

Results

Data was collected from November 2012 through December 2013, including 2,159 screened women. The majority of patients identified as black/African American and were 18–49 years old. Also, 6.0 % (n = 130) had positive screens, and 60.9 % (n = 67) of the 110 patients who agreed to be contacted provided a detailed family history. A total of 47 patients (42.7 %) met National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines when family history was clarified. Fourteen (12.7 %) underwent genetic testing; 1 patient was positive for a BRCA2 mutation, and 1 patient was found to carry a variant of uncertain significance.

Conclusions

The introduction of genomics practice within public health departments has provided access to comprehensive cancer care for uninsured individuals. The successful implementation of the B-RST into public health centers demonstrates the opportunity for integration of HBOC screening into primary care practices.

Keywords

National Comprehensive Cancer Network National Comprehensive Cancer Network Minority Woman Public Health Center United States Preventive Service Task Force 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors are in appreciation of a funding opportunity award in the form of a Cooperative Agreement from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to the Georgia Department of Public Health, administered by the Georgia Center for Oncology Research and Education in partnership with Emory University, Morehouse School of Medicine, and Georgia State University. The authors would also like to acknowledge the staff at the Department of Public Health, including those members at the individual public health centers that are currently administering the initial screening tool. Most importantly, we acknowledge, the clients who agree to screening, especially those who agree to be contacted further and proceed with testing. Finally, we acknowledge the Wilbur and Hilda Glenn Family Foundation and Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University’s Glenn Family Breast Center for providing pilot funding that led to Georgia’s successful CDC grant award.

Disclosure

Alice Kerber: Pfizer Inc., speakers bureau.

References

  1. 1.
    U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:355–61.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berry DA, Iversen ES Jr, Gudbjartsson DR, Hiller EH, Garber JE, Peshkin BN, et al. BRACPRO validation, sensitivity of genetic testing of BRCA1/BRCA2, and prevalence of other breast cancer susceptibility genes. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:2701–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tyrer J, Duffy SW, Cuzick J. A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors. Stat Med. 2004;23:1111–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Antoniou AC, Pharoah PP, Smith P, Easton DF. The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 2004;91:1580–90.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Teller P, Hoskins KF, Zwaagstra A, Stanislaw C, Iyengar R, Green VL, et al. Validation of the Pedigree Assessment Tool (PAT) in families with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:240–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moyer VA on behalf of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer in women: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:271–81.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bellcross CA, Lemke AA, Pape LS, Tess AL, Meisner LT. Evaluation of a breast/ovarian cancer genetics referral screening tool in a mammography population. Genet Med. 2009;11:783–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bellcross CA. Further development and evaluation of a breast/ovarian cancer genetics referral screening tool. Genet Med. 2010;12:240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thompson HS, Sussner K, Schwartz MD, Edwards T, Forman A, Jandorf L, et al. Receipt of genetic counseling recommendations among black women at high risk for BRCA mutations. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2012;16:1257–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sheppard VB, Mays D, LaVeist T, Tercyak KP. Medical mistrust influences black women’s level of engagement in BRCA1/2 genetic counseling and testing. J Natl Med Assoc. 2013;105:17–22.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thompson HS, Valdimarsdottir HB, Duteau-Buck C, Guevarra J, Bovbjerg DH, Richmond-Avellaneda C, et al. Psychosocial predictors of BRCA counseling and testing decisions among urban African-American women. Cancer Epidem Biomarkers. 2002;11:1579–85.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Armstrong K, Micco E, Carney A, Stopfer J, Putt M. Racial differences in the use of BRCA1/2 testing among women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer. JAMA. 2005;293:1729–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC awards programmatic funding to support breast cancer genomics. http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/breast/what_cdc_is_doing/genomics_foa.htm (2013). Accessed 17 March 2014.

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Brannon Traxler
    • 1
  • Monique L. Martin
    • 2
  • Alice S. Kerber
    • 2
  • Cecelia A. Bellcross
    • 3
  • Barbara E. Crane
    • 4
  • Victoria Green
    • 5
  • Roland Matthews
    • 6
  • Nancy M. Paris
    • 2
  • Sheryl G. A. Gabram
    • 1
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Georgia Center for Oncology Research and EducationAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Human GeneticsEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA
  4. 4.Georgia Department of Public HealthAtlantaUSA
  5. 5.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA
  6. 6.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMorehouse School of MedicineAtlantaUSA
  7. 7.Grady Memorial HospitalAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations