Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Follow-Up After Gastrectomy for Cancer: An Appraisal of the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer supports the practice of follow-up after radical surgery for gastric cancer.

Methods

This multicenter, retrospective study (1998–2009) included patients with T1-4N0-3M0 gastric cancer who had undergone D2 gastrectomy and lymphadenectomy, with at least 15 lymph nodes examined, and who had developed recurrent disease. Timing and site of recurrence were correlated to the actual scheduled follow-up timing and modalities.

Results

From eight centers, 814 patients with recurrent cancer and over 1,754 (46.4 %) patients undergoing gastrectomy were investigated (median follow-up 31 months). The most frequent sites of recurrence were local/regional lymph nodes (35.4 %), liver (24.3 %), peritoneum (30.3 %), lung (10.4 %) and intraluminal (7.5 %). Ninety-four percent of the recurrences were diagnosed within 2 years and 98 % within 3 years. Thoracoabdominal computed tomography (CT) scan and (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (18-FDG-PET) detected more than 90 % of recurrences, abdominal ultrasound detected 70 % and tumor markers detected 40 %, while <10 % were identified by physical examination, chest X-ray, and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Twenty-six percent of patients with recurrence were treated, but only 3.2 % were treated with potentially radical intent.

Conclusion

Oncological follow-up after radical surgery for gastric cancer should be focused in the first 3 years, and based mainly on thoracoabdominal CT scan and 18-FDG-PET.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roviello F, Marrelli D, de Manzoni G, et al. Prospective study of peritoneal recurrence after curative surgery for gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1113–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shiraishi N, Inomata M, Osawa N, Yasuda K, Adachi Y, Kitano S. Early and late recurrence after gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma: univariate and multivariate analyses. Cancer. 2000;89:255–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schwarz RE, Zagala-Nevarez K. Recurrence patterns after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: prognostic factors and implications for postoperative adjuvant therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:394–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Baiocchi GL, Tiberio G, Minicozzi A, et al. A multicentric western analysis of prognostic factors in advanced, node-negative gastric cancer patients. Ann Surg. 2010;252:70–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marrelli D, Roviello F, de Manzoni G, et al. Different pattern of recurrence in gastric cancer depending on Lauren’s histological type: a longitudinal study. World J Surg. 2002;26:1160–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bohner H, Zimmer T, Hopfenmüller W, Berger G, Buhr HJ. Detection and prognosis of recurrent gastric cancer; is routine follow-up after gastrectomy worthwhile? Hepatogastroenterology. 2000;47:1489–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eom BW, Ryu KW, Lee JH, et al. Oncologic effectiveness of regular follow-up to detect recurrence after curative resection of gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;18:358–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kodera Y, Ito S, Yamamura Y, Mochizuki Y, et al. Follow-up surveillance for recurrence after curative gastric cancer surgery lacks survival benefit. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:898–902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tan IT, So BY. Value of intensive follow-up of patients after curative surgery for gastric carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2007;96:503–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Villarreal-Garza C, Rojas-Flores M, Castro-Sánchez A, Villa AR, García-Aceituno L, León-Rodríguez E. Improved outcome in asymptomatic recurrence following curative surgery for gastric cancer. Med Oncol. 2011;28:973–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Whiting J, Sano T, Saka M, Fukagawa T, Katai H, Sasako M. Follow-up of gastric cancer: a review. Gastric Cancer. 2006;9:74–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Verlato G, Roviello F, Marchet A, et al. Indexes of surgical quality in gastric cancer surgery: experience of an Italian network. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:594–602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Marrelli D, De Stefano A, de Manzoni G, Morgagni P, Di Leo A, Roviello F. Prediction of recurrence after radical surgery for gastric cancer: a scoring system obtained from a prospective multicenter study. Ann Surg. 2005;241:247–255.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marrelli D, Caruso S, Roviello F. Follow-up and treatment of recurrence. In: de Manzoni G, Roviello F, Siquini W, editors. Surgery in the multimodal management of gastric cancer. Milan: Springer; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bennett JJ, Gonen M, D’Angelica M, Jaques DP, Brennan MF, Coit DG. Is detection of asymptomatic recurrence after curative resection associated with improved survival in patients with gastric cancer? J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:503–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim JH, Jang YJ, Park SS, Park SH, Mok YJ. Benefit of post-operative surveillance for recurrence after curative resection for gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:969–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hur H, Song KY, Park CH, Jeon HM. Follow-up strategy after curative resection of gastric cancer: a nationwide survey in Korea. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:54–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moon YW, Jeung HC, Rha SY, et al. Changing patterns of prognosticators during 15-year follow-up of advanced gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy: a 15-year follow-up study at a single Korean institute. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2730–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nashimoto A, Yabusaki H, Nakagawa S. Proper follow-up schedule after curative gastric surgery [in Japanese]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2009;36:1402–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamamoto M, Yamanaka T, Baba H, Kakeji Y, Maehara Y. The postoperative recurrence and the occurrence of second primary carcinomas in patients with early gastric carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2008;97:231–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sano T, Sasako M, Kinoshita T, Maruyama K. Recurrence of early gastric cancer: follow-up of 1475 patients and review of the Japanese literature. Cancer. 1993;72:3174–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nashimoto A, Yabusaki H, Nakagawa S. Evaluation and problems of follow-up surveillance after curative gastric cancer surgery. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2007;108:120–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee SY, Lee JH, Hwang NC, et al. The role of follow-up endoscopy after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005;31:265–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Morgagni P, Marfisi C, Gardini A, et al. Subtotal gastrectomy as treatment for distal multifocal early gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:2239–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Marrelli D, Pinto E, De Stefano A, Farnetani M, Garosi L, Roviello F. Clinical utility of CEA, CA 19-9, and CA 72-4 in the follow-up of patients with resectable gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 2001;181:16–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ohtsuka T, Nakafusa Y, Sato S, Kitajima Y, Tanaka M, Miyazaki K. Different roles of tumor marker monitoring after curative resections of gastric and colorectal cancers. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:1537–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Takahashi Y, Takeuchi T, Sakamoto J, et al; Tumor Marker Committee. The usefulness of CEA and/or CA19-9 in monitoring for recurrence in gastric cancer patients: a prospective clinical study. Gastric Cancer. 2003;6:142–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tas F, Faruk Aykan N, Aydiner A, Yasasever V, Topuz E. Measurement of serum CA 19-9 may be more valuable than CEA in prediction of recurrence in patients with gastric cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2001;24:148–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, National Research Council. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 2005.

  30. International Commission on Radiological Protection. The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. New York: International Commission on Radiological Protection; 2007. ICRP publication 103.

  31. Yoo SY, Kim KW, Han JK, Kim AY, Lee HJ, Choi BI. Helical CT of postoperative patients with gastric carcinoma: value in evaluating surgical complications and tumor recurrence. Abdom Imaging. 2003;28:617–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jadvar H, Tatlidil R, Garcia AA, Conti PS. Evaluation of recurrent gastric malignancy with [F-18]-FDG positron emission tomography. Clin Radiol. 2003;58:215–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sun L, Su XH, Guan YS, et al. Clinical role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in post-operative follow up of gastric cancer: initial results. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:4627–32.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Takeyoshi I, Ohwada S, Ogawa T, et al. The resection of non-hepatic intraabdominal recurrence of gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2000;47:1479–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sakamoto Y, Ohyama S, Yamamoto J, et al. Surgical resection of liver metastases of gastric cancer: an analysis of a 17-year experience with 22 patients. Surgery. 2003;133:507–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Okano K, Maeba T, Ishimura K, et al. Hepatic resection for metastatic tumors from gastric cancer. Ann Surg. 2002;235:86–91.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tiberio GA, Coniglio A, Marchet A, et al. Metachronous hepatic metastases from gastric carcinoma: a multicentric survey. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35:486–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. de Liano AD, Yarnoz C, Aguilar R, Artieda C, Ortiz H. Surgical treatment of recurrent gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2008;11:10–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gian Luca Baiocchi MD.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 24 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (PPT 258 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baiocchi, G.L., Marrelli, D., Verlato, G. et al. Follow-Up After Gastrectomy for Cancer: An Appraisal of the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21, 2005–2011 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3534-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3534-8

Keywords

Navigation