Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of Billroth I and Roux-en-Y Reconstruction after Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: One-year Postoperative Effects Assessed by a Multi-institutional RCT

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This randomized, controlled trial evaluated the clinical efficacy of Billroth I (BI) and Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstruction at 1 year after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Methods

The primary end point was the amount of body weight lost at 1 postoperative year, and secondary end points included other items related to nutritional status such as serum albumin and lymphocyte count, as well as endoscopic examination findings of the remnant stomach and esophagus. Of the 332 patients enrolled, 163 were assigned to the BI group and 169 were randomized to the RY group.

Results

The loss in body weight 1 year after surgery did not differ significantly between the BI and RY groups (9.1 % and 9.7 %, respectively, p = 0.39). There were no significant differences in other aspects of nutritional status between the 2 groups. Endoscopic examination 1 year after gastrectomy showed reflux esophagitis in 26 patients (17 %) in the BI group versus 10 patients (6 %) in the RY group (p = 0.0037), while remnant gastritis was observed in 71 patients (46 %) in the BI group versus 44 patients (28 %) in the RY group (p = 0.0013); differences were significant for both conditions. Multivariable analysis showed that the only reconstruction was the independently associated factor with the incidence of reflux esophagitis.

Conclusions

RY reconstruction was not superior to BI in terms of body weight change or other aspects of nutritional status at 1 year after surgery, although RY more effectively prevented reflux esophagitis and remnant gastritis after distal gastrectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yoshino K. History of gastric cancer surgery. J Jpn Surg Soc. 2000;101:855–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Taylor PR, Mason RC, Filipe MI, et al. Gastric carcinogenesis in the rat induced by duodenogastric reflux without carcinogens: morphology, mucin histochemistry, polyamine metabolism, and labeling index. Gut. 1991;32:1447–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fein M, Peters JH, Chandrasoma P, et al. Duodenoesophageal refluxinduces esophageal adenocarcinoma without exogenous carcinogen. J Gastrointest Surg. 1998;2:260–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldstein SR, Yang GY, Curtis SK, et al. Development of esophageal metaplasia and adenocarcinoma in a rat surgical model without the use of a carcinogen. Carcinogenesis. 1997;18:2265–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fukuhara K, Osugi H, Takeda N, et al. Reconstructive procedure after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer that best prevents duodenenoesophageal reflux. World J Surg. 2002;26:1452–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mathias JR, Fernandez A, Sninsky CA, et al. Nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain after Roux-en-Y anastomosis: motility of the jejunal limb. Gastroenterology. 1985;88:101–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kojima K, Yamada H, Inokuchi M, et al. A comparison of Roux-en-Y and Billroth-I reconstruction after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. Ann Surg. 2008;247:962–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ishikawa M, Kitayama J, Kaizaki S, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing Billroth-I and Roux-en-Y procedures after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Surg. 2005;29:1415–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Montesani C, D’Amato A, Santella S, et al. Billroth-I versus Billroth-II versus Roux-en-Y after subtotal gastrectomy. Prospective randomized study. Hepatogastroenterology. 2002;49:1469–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. 13th edition. Tokyo: Kanehara; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, et al. Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut. 1999;45:172–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Demas GE, Drazen DL, Nelson RJ, et al. Reductions in total body fat decrease humoral immunity. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2003;270:905–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Marinho LA, Rettori O, Vieira-Matos AN, et al. Body weight loss as an indicator of breast cancer recurrence. Acta Oncol. 2001;40:832–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsugane S, Sasaki S, Tsubono Y. Under- and overweight impact on mortality among middle-aged Japanese men and women: a 10-y follow-up of JPHC study cohort I. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002;6:529–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Onodera T, Goseki N, Kosaki G. Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery of malnourished cancer patients. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zashi. 1984;85:1001–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Imamura H, Takiguchi S, Yamamoto K, et al. Morbidity and mortality results from a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing billroth I and Roux-en-Y reconstructive procedures after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Surg. 2012;36:632–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Takiguchi S, Yamamoto K, Hirao M, et al. A comparison of postoperative quality of life and dysfunction after Billroth I and Roux-en-Y reconstruction following distalgastrectomy for gastric cancer: results from a multi-institutional RCT. Gastric Cancer. 2012;15:198–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fujita J, Imamura H, Takiguchi K, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing Billroth-I and Roux-en-Y reconstruction in distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. ASCO GI. In press.

  19. Shinoto K, Ochiai T, Suzuki T, et al. Effectiveness of Roux-en-Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy based on an assessment of biliary kinetics. Surg Today. 2003;33:169–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fukuhara K, Osugi H, Takeda N, et al. Quantitative determinations of duodenogastric reflux, prevalence of Helicobacter pyroli infection, and concentrations of interleukin-8. World J Surg. 2003;27:567–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Tomoyuki Sugimoto at Osaka University for help with the statistical analysis. Participating institutions and chief participants: Sakai Municipal Hospital (H. Furukawa, H. Imamura), Osaka University (Y. Doki, S. Takiguchi), Osaka National Hospital (T. Tsujinaka, K. Fujitani), Toyonaka Municipal Hospital (J. Fujita, K. Kawanishi), Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases (M. Yano, I. Miyashiro), Kinki Central Hospital of the Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers (K. Kobayashi), NTT West Osaka Hospital (Y. Kimura), Yao Municipal Hospital (Y. Fukushima, J. Matsuyama), Hyogo Prefectural Nishinomiya Hospital (H. Yano, H. Taniguchi), Kansai Rosai Hospital (S. Tamura, H. Miki), Ikeda Municipal Hospital (K. Shibata, T. Hirao), Belland General Hospital (K. Demura), SEMPOS Seamen’s Insurance hospital (Y. Tsukahara), Saiseikai Senri Hospital (H. Fukunaga), Nishinomiya Municipal Hospital (H. Oka), Suita Municipal Hospital (C. Ebisui, K. Okada), Itami Municipal Hospital (M. Hiratsuka), and Mino Municipal Hospital (S. Iijima, Y. Makari).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuji Takiguchi MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hirao, M., Takiguchi, S., Imamura, H. et al. Comparison of Billroth I and Roux-en-Y Reconstruction after Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: One-year Postoperative Effects Assessed by a Multi-institutional RCT. Ann Surg Oncol 20, 1591–1597 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2704-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2704-9

Keywords

Navigation