Flap Survival of Skin-Sparing Mastectomy Type IV: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 75 Consecutive Cases
- 466 Downloads
High incidence of epidermolysis and full thickness necrosis of Wise-pattern skin-sparing mastectomy (WPM) skin flaps to almost 30 % represent the Achilles’ heel of this procedure. Our purpose was to investigate potential predictors of skin flap ischemic complications (SFIC) in WPM.
A total of 75 immediate prosthetic reconstructions following Wise-pattern mastectomy on 63 patients were retrospectively analyzed to assess risk factors for SFIC and their impact on aesthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction. There were 2 clusters of hypothetic predictors investigated: patient-related (age, body mass index, smoking, neoadjuvant chemotherapy) and procedure-related (implant weight, breast weight, curative-prophylactic procedure, axillary lymph nodes dissection). Significant predictors from univariate and mixed-effects multivariate logistic regression analyses were considered to be important selection criteria that expose the patients to higher risk of SFIC. Moreover, patients were divided into 3 subgroups according to postoperative outcome: (A) group healed uneventfully, (B) with partial thickness, and (C) with full thickness necrosis. Aesthetic evaluations scores of subgroups were analyzed and compared using a Kruskal–Wallis analysis of variance, and Dunn’s test for multiple comparisons between subgroups.
Smoking and weight of prosthesis >468 g showed significant association with SFIC, additionally analysis of aesthetic evaluations confirmed differences between subgroups (p = 0.001), and multiple testing showed significance between subgroup A and C (p < 0.05).
Patients with clinically significant predictors are at higher risk of postoperative SFIC and consequently less satisfied of their aesthetic outcomes. The surgeon should consider alternative procedures for such patients, and prostheses heavier than 468 g should be avoided.
KeywordsSentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Breast Reconstruction Skin Flap Aesthetic Evaluation
Consent form was obtained from all patients and the Ethical Committee of Sant’Andrea Hospital approved the study.
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest.
- 8.Nava MB, Cortinovis U, Ottolenghi J, Riggio E, Pennati A, Catanuto G, et al. Skin-reducing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:603–10; discussion 611–3.Google Scholar
- 11.Bostwick J. Total mastectomy with breast skin and volume reduction using an inverted T incision. Plastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publisher; 1990. p. 1369–73.Google Scholar
- 14.Woerdeman LAE, Hage JJ, Smeulders M, Rutgers EJ, van der Horst CM. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction by use of implants: an assessment of risk factors for complications and cancer control in 120 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;118:321–30.Google Scholar
- 27.Gelman A, Hill J. Logistic regression. In: Gelman A, Hill J, editors. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. p. 81–2.Google Scholar
- 38.Hsich F, Miroshnik M, Lam T. Silicone breast implants are thicker than water. ESSR Abstr. 2010;1(1)s17:OP 10–4.Google Scholar