Advertisement

Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 19, Issue 10, pp 3223–3229 | Cite as

Reconstruction Patterns in a Single Institution Cohort of Women Undergoing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer

  • Leisha Elmore
  • Terence M. Myckatyn
  • Feng Gao
  • Carla S. Fisher
  • Jordan Atkins
  • Tonya M. Martin-Dunlap
  • Julie A. Margenthaler
Breast Oncology

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of the current study was to conduct a patient-centered investigation of reconstruction practices following mastectomy at our institution.

Methods

A questionnaire was administered to patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral mastectomy for breast cancer from 2006 to 2010. The survey queried on demographics, surgical choices, and rationale for those choices. Data were summarized by contingency tables and compared by chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate.

Results

Of 321 patients queried, 185 (58 %) underwent unilateral mastectomy and 136 (42 %) underwent bilateral mastectomy (mean age 56 ± 12 years). Overall, 189 (59 %) women underwent breast reconstruction, and 132 (41 %) did not. Immediate breast reconstruction was performed in 125 of 189 (69 %) women, whereas 67 of 189 (31 %) underwent delayed reconstruction. The method of definitive reconstruction included 143 of 189 (75 %) prostheses, 32 of 189 (17 %) abdominal tissue flap, 12 of 189 (6 %) latissimus flap (±implant), and 5 of 189 (2 %) with a combination of prostheses and tissue flaps. Of the 114 patients who did not undergo reconstruction, 68 (60 %) reported lack of desire for reconstruction as their motive, and the remaining 46 (40 %) reported medical contraindications for reconstruction or did not report a specific reason.

Conclusions

A significant percentage of women undergoing unilateral or bilateral mastectomy for breast cancer at our institution elect to undergo reconstruction. Prosthetic reconstruction was the most common method utilized. The impetus for referral to the reconstructive surgeon was nearly always initiated by the surgical oncologist.

Keywords

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Breast Reconstruction Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Prophylactic Mastectomy Bilateral Mastectomy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Fisher B, et al. Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1456–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Veronesi U, et al. Comparison of Halsted mastectomy with quandrantectomy, axillary dissection and radiotherapy in early breast cancer: long-term results. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1986;22(9):1085–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bland K, et al. The National Cancer Data Base 10-year survey of breast carcinoma treatment at hospitals in the United States. Cancer. 1998;83(6):1262–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gomez SL, et al. Increasing mastectomy rates for early-stage breast cancer? Population-based trends from California. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(10):e155–7; author reply e158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McGuire KP, et al. Are mastectomies on the rise? A 13-year trend analysis of the selection of mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy in 5865 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(10):2682–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Habermann E, et al. Are mastectomy rates really increasing in the United States? J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(21):3437–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Katipamula R, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effects of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(25):4082–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wilkins EG, et al. Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106(5):1014–25; discussion 1026–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36(15):1938–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heneghan HM, et al. Quality of life after immediate breast reconstruction and skin-sparing mastectomy: a comparison with patients undergoing breast conserving surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37(11):937–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wellisch DK, et al. Psychosocial correlates of immediate versus delayed reconstruction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;76(5):713–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yueh JH, et al. Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(6):1585–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paulson R, Chang F, Helmer S. Kansas surgeons’ attitudes toward immediate breast reconstruction: a statewide survey. Am J Surg. 1994;168(6):543–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Allweis T, et al. Immediate reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer does not prolong the time to starting adjuvant chemotherapy. Am J Surg. 2002;183(3):218–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eberlein T, et al. Prospective evaluation of immediate reconstruction after mastectomy. Ann Surg. 1993;218(1):29–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gieni M, et al. Local breast cancer recurrence after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for invasive cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast. 2012;21(3):230–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McCarthy CM, et al. Breast cancer recurrence following prosthetic, postmastectomy reconstruction: incidence, detection, and treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(2):381–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Noguchi M, et al. Oncological aspect of immediate breast reconstruction in mastectomy patients. J Surg Oncol. 1992;50(4):241–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reddy S, et al. Breast cancer recurrence following postmastectomy reconstruction compared to mastectomy with no reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;66(5):466–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Morrow M, et al. Factors influencing the use of breast reconstruction postmastectomy: a National Cancer Database study. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;192(1):1–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Platt J, Baxter N, Zhong T. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer. CMAJ. 2011;183(18):2109–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kruper L, et al. Disparities in reconstruction rates after mastectomy: patterns of care and factors associated with the use of breast reconstruction in Southern California. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(8):2158–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Polednak AP. Postmastectomy breast reconstruction in Connecticut: trends and predictors. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:669–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Polednak AP. Geographic variation in postmastectomy breast reconstruction rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:298–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Alderman AK, et al. Correlates of referral practices of general surgeons to plastic surgeons for mastectomy reconstruction. Cancer. 2007;109(9):1715–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Reaby LL. Reasons why women who have mastectomy decide to have or not to have breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101(7):1810–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    August D, Wilkins E, Rea T. Breast reconstruction in older women. Surgery. 1994;115(6):663–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bowman CC, et al. Breast reconstruction in older women: should age be an exclusion criterion? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:16–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Alderman AK, et al. Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(7):2265–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Manganiello A, et al. Sexuality and quality of life of breast cancer patients post mastectomy. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2011:167–72.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lee CN, Hultman CS, Sepucha K. What are patients’ goals and concerns about breast reconstruction after mastectomy? Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64(5):567–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Evans GR, et al. Reconstruction and the radiated breast: is there a role for implants? Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96(5):1111–5; discussion 1116–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ascherman JA, et al. Implant reconstruction in breast cancer patients treated with radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(2):359–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schuster RH, et al. Breast reconstruction in women treated with radiation therapy for breast cancer: cosmesis, complications, and tumor control. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90(3):445–52; discussion 453–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kronowitz SJ, Robb GL. Radiation therapy and breast reconstruction: a critical review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(2):395–408.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Williams J, et al. TRAM flap breast reconstruction after radiation treatment. Ann Surg. 1995;221(6):756–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hunt KK, et al. Feasibility of postmastectomy radiation therapy after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4(5):377–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tran NV, et al. Comparison of immediate and delayed free TRAM flap breast reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108(1):78–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leisha Elmore
    • 1
  • Terence M. Myckatyn
    • 1
  • Feng Gao
    • 2
  • Carla S. Fisher
    • 3
  • Jordan Atkins
    • 1
  • Tonya M. Martin-Dunlap
    • 1
  • Julie A. Margenthaler
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryPerelman School of Medicine, Hospital of the University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Division of BiostatisticsWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations