Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 19, Issue 11, pp 3410–3415 | Cite as

Relationship Between the Lymphatic Drainage of the Breast and the Upper Extremity: A Postmortem Study

Breast Oncology

Abstract

Background

This anatomic study details the lymphatic drainage of the upper extremity (UE) and breast, as well as its course in the axilla and its relation to axillary reverse mapping. Two aspects important for breast cancer surgery were followed: connection between the lymphatics of the UE and breast, and the possible cause of lymphedema of the UE after sentinel node (SN) biopsy.

Methods

Patent blue dye was injected bilaterally in 23 cadavers with no history of breast carcinoma to simultaneously visualize the lymphatics of the UE and breast. After visualization and dissection of the lymphatic vessels and nodes, a record of their routes was made. A scheme of superficial UE and breast lymphatics was constructed.

Results

After application of color contrast to the UE, 2–4 main afferent collectors were shown. As opposed to cranial and medial collectors, caudal collectors diverged from the axillary vein and entered the caudal axilla. In five (10.8 %) cases, the caudal collector entered a node, which was considered to be the SN of the breast. In six (13 %) cases, the SN of the breast and SNs of the UE were found in close proximity (up to 1.5 cm).

Conclusions

Lymphatic drainage of the UE and breast are closely related in the caudal part of the axilla. SN groups for the UE and breast share connections in 24 % of cases, which could explain lymphedema after surgery if damaged. Additional studies are needed to further improve our understanding of the lymphatic drainage of the UE and breast.

Keywords

Sentinel Node Lymphatic Vessel Lymphedema Lymphatic Drainage Lymphatic Mapping 

Notes

Acknowledgment

Supported by Grant NS 9773-4 of the Internal Grant Agency of the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic.

References

  1. 1.
    Swenson KK, Nissen MJ, Ceronsky C, Swenson L, Lee MW, Tuttle TM. Comparison of side effects between sentinel lymph node and axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:745–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gerber L, Lampert M, Wood C, et al. Comparison of pain, motion, and edema after modified radical mastectomy vs. local excision with axillary dissection and radiation. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1992;21:139–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Noguchi M. Axillary reverse mapping for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;119:529–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thompson M, Korourian S, Henry-Tillman R, et al. Axillary reverse mapping (ARM): a new concept to identify and enhance lymphatic preservation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1890–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wilke LG, McCall LM, Posther KE, et al. Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy: results from a prospective international cooperative group trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:491–500.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Casabona F, Bogliolo S, Valenzano Menada M, Sala P, Villa G, Ferrero S. Feasibility of axillary reverse mapping during sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2459–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klimberg VS. A new concept toward the prevention of lymphedema: axillary reverse mapping. J Surg Oncol. 2008;97:563–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pressman PI. Surgical treatment and lymphedema. Cancer. 1998;83(12 Suppl Am):2782–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ponzone R, Mininanni P, Cassina E, Sismondi P. Axillary reverse mapping in breast cancer: can we spare what we find? Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:390–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Suami H, Pan WR, Mann GB, Taylor GI. The lymphatic anatomy of the breast and its implications for sentinel lymph node biopsy: a human cadaver study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:863–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Suami H, Taylor GI, Pan WR. The lymphatic territories of the upper limb: anatomical study and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:1813–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cruikshank C. The anatomy of the absorbing vessels of the human body. London: G. Nicol, 1786.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sappey C. Anatomie, physiologie, pathologie des vaisseaux lymphatiques consideres chez l’homme at les vertebres. Paris: A. Delahaye and E. Lecrosnier, 1874.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Delamere G, Poirier P, Cuneo B. The lymphatics. In: Charpy PP, ed. A trearise of human anatomy. Westminster: Archibald Constable, 1903.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Borgstein PJ, Meijer S, Pijpers RJ, van Diest PJ. Functional lymphatic anatomy for sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer: echoes from the past and the periareolar blue method. Ann Surg. 2000;232:81–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kett K, Szilágyi K, Anga B, Kett AG, Királyfalvi K. Axillary lymph drainage as a prognostic factor of survival in breast cancer. Lymphology. 2002;35:161–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kelley MC, Hansen N, McMasters KM. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2004;188:49–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McMasters KM, Tuttle TM, Carlson DJ, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer: a suitable alternative to routine axillary dissection in multi-institutional practice when optimal technique is used. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2560–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pecha V, Kolarik D, Kozevnikova R, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26102.
  20. 20.
    Suami H, Pan WR, Taylor GI. Changes in the lymph structure of the upper limb after axillary dissection: radiographic and anatomical study in a human cadaver. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:982–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gerota D. Zur Technik der Lymphgefassinjektion—Eine neue Injektionsmasse fuer Lymphgefasse—Polychrome Injektion. Anat Anz. 1896;12:216–24.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Boneti C, Korourian S, Diaz Z, et al. Scientific Impact Award. Axillary reverse mapping (ARM) to identify and protect lymphatics draining the arm during axillary lymphadenectomy. Am J Surg. 2009;198:482–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rubio I, Cebrecos I, Peg V, et al. Extensive nodal involvement increases the positivity of blue nodes in the axillary reverse mapping procedure in patients with breast cancer. J Surg Oncol. doi: 10.1002/jso.23048.
  24. 24.
    Ponzone R, Cont N, Maggiorotto F, et al. Extensive nodal disease may impair axillary reverse mapping in patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;33:5547–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Clough KB, Nasr R, Nos C, Vieira M, Inguenault C, Poulet B. New anatomical classification of the axilla with implications for sentinel node biopsy. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1659–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bedrosian I, Babiera GV, Mittendorf EA, et al. A phase I study to assess the feasibility and oncologic safety of axillary reverse mapping in breast cancer patients. Cancer. 2010;116:2543–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schrenk P, Rieger R, Shamiyeh A, Wayand W. Morbidity following sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection for patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;88:608–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oncogynecologic Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of MedicineCharles University in Prague and General University HospitalPragueCzech Republic
  2. 2.Institute of Anatomy, First Faculty of MedicineCharles University in PraguePragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations