Advertisement

Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 18, Issue 7, pp 1852–1859 | Cite as

Functional Outcome of Arthrodesis with a Vascularized Fibular Graft and a Rotational Latissimus Dorsi Flap After Proximal Humerus Sarcoma Resection

  • Jin Wang
  • Jingnan Shen
  • Ian C. Dickinson
Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Abstract

Background

The prognosis of humeral sarcomas has improved greatly in the past 20 years. As a result, the challenges for orthopedic oncologists include long-term handicap and local morbidity.

Methods

Shoulder reconstruction after the resection of sarcomas with the proximal humerus was evaluated for 55 patients from 1990 to 2007 at two universities. After S34(5)B resections (intra-articular resection of the proximal humerus and the abductor mechanism), the shoulders were reconstructed with arthrodesis, prosthesis, or allograft–prosthesis composites (APC).

Results

At the time of the latest follow-up examination, the average duration of follow-up was 86.73 months for the 39 patients who were still alive and whose limbs were salvaged. The local recurrence rate was 7.27% (4 of 55). Functional evaluation was conducted on the 39 patients who had the postreconstructions: 12 arthrodeses, 17 prostheses, and 10 APC. Statistical analysis showed that the functional score of shoulder reconstruction significantly varied among the three groups by the test of homogeneity of variances with P = 0.222, by analysis of variance with P < 0.01, and by post hoc test (Student–Newman–Keuls) with α = 0.05. Primary arthrodesis resulted in better function and increased strength than the prostheses and the APC. Insertion of an allograft, a vascularized fibular graft, a rotational latissimus dorsi flap, and cancellous autograft bone were the preferred arthrodesis techniques used to achieve fusion and reduce complications.

Conclusions

After resection of the sarcoma with the proximal humerus with the abductor apparatus, shoulder arthrodesis is recommended above other reconstructions for better functional outcome as well as increased strength and capacity to position the hand.

Keywords

Rotator Cuff Proximal Humerus Distal Humerus Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Fibular Graft 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 30872967).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Wada T, Usui M, Isu K, Yamawakii S, Ishii S. Reconstruction and limb salvage after resection for malignant bone tumor of the proximal humerus. A sling procedure using a free vascularised fibular graft. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:808–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gebhardt MC, Roth YF, Mankin HJ. Osteoarticular allografts for reconstruction in the proximal part of the humerus after excision of a musculoskeletal tumor. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:334–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mankin HJ, Gebhardt MC, Jennings LC, Springfield DS, Tomford WW. Long-term results of allograft replacement in the management of bone tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;324:86–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Scarborough MT, Helmstedter CS. Arthrodesis after resection of bone tumors. Semin Surg Oncol. 1997;13:25–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA. A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;153:106–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Enneking W, Dunham W, Gebhardt M, Malawar M, Pritchard D. A system for the classification of skeletal resections. Chir Organi Mov. 1990;75(Suppl):217–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Malawer MM. Tumors of the shoulder girdle. Technique of resection and description of a surgical classification. Orthop Clin North Am. 1991;22:7–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Damron TA, Rock MG, O’Connor MI, et al. Functional laboratory assessment after oncologic shoulder joint resections. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;348:124–34.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Linberg BE. Interscapulo-thoracic resection for malignant tumors of the shoulder joint region 1928. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;358:3–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    O’Connor MI, Sim FH, Chao EY. Limb salvage for neoplasms of the shoulder girdle. Intermediate reconstructive and functional results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1872–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Richards RR, Sherman RMP, Hudson AR, Waddell JP. Shoulder arthrodesis using a pelvic-reconstruction plate. A report of eleven cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:416–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:241–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kumar VP, Satku SK, Mitra AK, Pho RW. Function following limb salvage for primary tumors of the shoulder girdle. 10 patients followed 4 (1–11) years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1994;65:55–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bos G, Sim F, Pritchard D, et al. Prosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;224:178–91.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ross AC, Wilson JN, Scales JT. Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987;69:656–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kiss J, Sztrinkai G, Antal I, Kiss J, Szendroi M. Functional results and quality of life after shoulder girdle resections in musculoskeletal tumors. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:273–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Potter BK, Adams SC, Pitcher JD Jr, Malinin TI, Temple HT. Proximal humerus reconstructions for tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:1035–41.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Getty PJ, Peabody TD. Complications and functional outcomes of reconstruction with an osteoarticular allograft after intra-articular resection of the proximal aspect of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:1138–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abdeen A, Hoang BH, Athanasian EA, et al. Allograft–prosthesis composite reconstruction of the proximal part of the humerus: functional outcome and survivorship. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2406–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Enneking WF. Musculoskeletal tumor surgery, vol 1. New York: Churchill-Livingstone, 1983:360–1, 389.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fuchs B, O’Connor MI, Padgett DJ, Kaufman KR, Sim FH. Arthrodesis of the shoulder after tumor resection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;436:202–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Probyn LJ, Wunder JS, Bell RS, Griffin AM, Davis AM. A comparison of outcome of osteoarticular allograft reconstruction and shoulder arthrodesis following resection of primary tumours of the proximal humerus. Sarcoma. 1998;2:163–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Amin-Sherif N, Ebeid-Walid A. Shoulder reconstruction after tumor resection by pedicled scapular crest graft. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;397:133–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cofield RH, Briggs BT. Glenohumeral arthrodesis. Operative and long-term functional results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61:668–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Safran O, Iannotti JP. Arthrodesis of the shoulder (review). J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14(3):145–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Han CS, Wood MB, Bishop AT, Cooney WP. Vascularized bone transfer. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:1441–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chen CM, Disa JJ, Lee HY, et al. Reconstruction of extremity long bone defects after sarcoma resection with vascularized fibula flaps: a 10-year review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:915–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dorai AA, Halim AS, Zulmi W. Versatility of the latissimus dorsi flap in upper limb salvage tumor surgery. Med J Malaysia. 2004;59(Suppl F):42–6.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Behnam AB, Chen CM, Pusic AL, et al. The pedicled latissimus dorsi flap for shoulder reconstruction after sarcoma resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1591–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kim JS, Lee JS, Yoon JO, Park JB. Reconstruction of the shoulder region using a pedicled latissimus dorsi flap after resection of soft tissue due to sarcoma. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:1215–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rivas B, Carrillo JF, Onate-Ocana LF. Functional evaluation after reconstruction with myocutaneous and fasciocutaneous flaps for conservative oncological surgery of the extremities. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:721–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bickels J, Wittig JC, Kollender Y, et al. Limb-sparing resections of the shoulder girdle. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;194:422–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hawkins RJ, Neer CS. A functional analysis of shoulder fusions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;223:65–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Muskulaskeletal Oncology DepartmentFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhongshan UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.The Wesley HospitalThe Princess Alexandra Hospital, Wesley Medical CentreAuchenflowerAustralia

Personalised recommendations