Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic Factors of a Large Retrospective Series of Mucinous Borderline Tumors of the Ovary (Excluding Peritoneal Pseudomyxoma)

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To determine the prognosis and prognostic factors in a large series of mucinous borderline tumors of the ovary (MBOT).

Materials and Methods

A retrospective review of patients with MBOT treated or referred to our institution. Three inclusion criteria were defined: (1) centralized histological review by our expert pathologist, (2) exclusion of peritoneal pseudomyxoma and any synchronous malignant tumor in the abdominal cavity, and (3) available data on the management and outcomes of patients.

Results

From 1997 to 2004, 97 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria (95 stage I and 2 stage II disease). Of these, 9 patients had endocervical-like subtypes, 8 patients had stromal microinvasion, and 24 had intraepithelial carcinoma. Radical and conservative surgeries were performed, respectively, in 28 and 69 patients. After a median follow-up of 48 months, 13 patients had developed 14 recurrences: 7 were borderline and 7 were invasive lesions. The probability of recurrence in the form of carcinoma 5 and 10 years after the diagnosis was, respectively, 9 and 13%. The only prognostic factor for recurrence attaining statistical significance was the use of a cystectomy (compared with other surgeries relative risk [RR] = 5.6; P = 0.003; compared with salpingo-oophorectomy RR = 5.5; P = 0.012).

Conclusions

In the present series of 97 MBOT, mainly early-stage disease and excluding peritoneal pseudomyxoma, the cumulative risk of recurrence in the form of invasive carcinoma at 10 years was 13%. MBOT do not appear to be such a “safe” disease. The only prognostic factor for recurrence was the use of a cystectomy, suggesting that a salpingo-oophorectomy should be preferred in cases of conservative treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hart WR. Mucinous tumors of the ovary: a review. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2005;24:4–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ronnett BM, Kajdacsy-Balla A, Gilks CB, Merion MJ, Silva E, Werness BA, et al. Mucinous borderline ovarian tumors: points of general agreement and persistent controversies regarding nomenclature, diagnostic criteria, and behavior. Hum Pathol. 2004;35:949–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tavassoli FA, Devilee P, editors.World Health Organization: Tumours of the Breast and Female Genital Organs (WHO/IARC Classification of Tumours). IARC Press: Lyon; 2003.

  4. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Changes in definitions of clinical staging for carcinoma of the cervix and ovary. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;156:263–4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sumithran E, Susil BJ, Looi LM. The prognostic significance of grading in borderline mucinous tumors of the ovary. Hum Pathol. 1988;19:15–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ji H, Yliskoski M, Anttila M, Syrjanen K, Saarikoski S. Management of stage-I borderline ovarian tumors. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1996;54:37–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gotlieb W, Flikker S, Davidson B, Korach Y, Kopolovic J, Ben-Baruch G. Borderline tumors of the ovary: fertility treatment, conservative management, and pregnancy outcome. Cancer. 1998;82:141–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zanetta G, Rota S, Chiari S, Bonazzi C, Bratina G, Mangioni C. Behavior of borderline tumors with particular interest to persistence, recurrence, and progression to invasive carcinoma: a prospective study. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:2656–64.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Suh-Burgmann E. Long-term outcomes following conservative surgery for borderline tumor of the ovary: a large population-based study. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103:841–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yokoyama Y, Moriya T, Takano T, Shoji T, Takahashi O, Nakahara K, et al. Clinical outcome and risks factors for recurrence in borderline ovarian tumours. Br J Cancer. 2006;94:1586–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cho YH, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim KR, Kim YT, et al. Is complete surgical staging necessary in patients with stage I mucinous epithelial ovarian tumors? Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103:878–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wong HF, Low JJ, Chua Y, Busmanis I, Tay EH, Ho TH. Ovarian tumors of borderline malignancy: a review of 247 patients from 1991 to 2004. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007;17:342–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT, Nam JH. Surgical management of borderline ovarian tumors: the role of fertility-sparing surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;113:75–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hart WR, Norris HJ. Borderline and malignant mucinous tumors of the ovary. Cancer. 1973;31:1031–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Siriaunkgul S, Robbins KM, McGowan L, Silverberg SG. Ovarian mucinous tumors of low malignant potential: a clinicopathologic study of 54 tumors of intestinal and müllerian type. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1995;14:198–208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bradley RF, Stewart JH 4th, Russell GB, Levine EA, Geisinger KR. Pseudomyxoma peritonei of appendiceal origin: a clinicopathologic analysis of 101 patients uniformly treated at a single institution, with literature review. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30:551–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ronnett BM, Shmookler BM, Sugarbaker PH, Kurman RJ. Pseudomyxoma peritonei: new concepts in diagnosis, origin, nomenclature, and relationship to mucinous borderline (low malignant potential) tumors of the ovary. Anat Pathol. 1997;2:197–226.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shappell HW, Riopel MA, Smith Sehdev AE, Ronnett BM, Kurman RJ. Diagnostic criteria and behavior of ovarian seromucinous (endocervical-type mucinous and mixed cell-type) tumors: atypical proliferative (borderline) tumors, intraepithelial, microinvasive, and invasive carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26:1529–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rodriguez IM, Irving JA, Prat J. Endocervical-like mucinous borderline tumors of the ovary: a clinicopathologic analysis of 31 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28:1311–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rutgers JL, Scully RE. Ovarian mullerian mucinous papillary cystadenomas of borderline malignancy. A clinicopathologic analysis. Cancer. 1988;61:340–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Riopel MA, Ronnett BM, Kurman RJ. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria and behavior of ovarian intestinal-type mucinous tumors: atypical proliferative (borderline) tumors and intraepithelial, microinvasive, invasive, and metastatic carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999;23:617–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nomura K, Aizawa S. Noninvasive, microinvasive and invasive mucinous carcinomas of the ovary: a clinicopathologic analysis of 40 cases. Cancer. 2000;89:1541–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee KR, Scully RE. Mucinous tumors of the ovary: a clinicopathologic study of 196 borderline tumors (of intestinal type) and carcinomas, including an evaluation of 11 cases with “pseudomyxoma peritonei”. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24:1447–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. De Nictolis M, Montironi R, Tommasoni S, Valli M, Pisani E, Fabris G, et al. Benign, borderline, and well-differentiated malignant intestinal mucinous tumors of the ovary: a clinicopathologic, histochemical, immunohistochemical, and nuclear quantitative study of 57 cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1994;13:10–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Salomon LJ, Lhommé C, Pautier P, Duvillard P, Morice P. Safety of simple cystectomy in patients with unilateral mucinous borderline tumors. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ramirez PT, Slomovitz BM, McQuinn L, Levenback C, Coleman RL, et al. Role of appendectomy at the time of primary surgery in patients with early-stage ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103:888–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Morice P. Borderline tumours of the ovary and fertility. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42:149–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Lorna Saint Ange for editing. Acknowledgments to the following colleagues for updating the follow-up and outcomes of patients: Dr. Heurtin, Dr. Regal, Dr. Legent, Dr. Marti, Dr. Le Corre, Dr. Rouzier, Dr. Stoeckle, Dr. Floquet, Dr. Patrier Sallebert, Dr. Rossi, Dr. Quentin, Dr. Geraud, Dr. Jouatte, Dr. Baron, Dr. Collet, Dr. Auriault, Dr. Metzger, Dr. Foulques, Dr. Chabanne, Dr. Cayol, Dr. Hoock, Dr. Blanchot, Dr. Mercier, Dr. Sfairi, Dr. Fetissof, Dr. Khoudayer, Dr. Pichereau, Dr. Anger, Dr. Abbara, Dr. Henry, Dr. Cailliez, Dr. Houareau, Dr. Kessler, Dr. Aubert, Dr. Batt, Dr. Lupo, Dr. Guarnieri, Dr. Beaumont, Dr. Maes, Dr. Botti, Dr. Collin Barres, Dr. Hamdan, Dr. Le Vaguers, Dr. Barres, Dr. Deffieux, Dr. Loridon, Dr. Roy Bouzonnet, Dr. Sobole, Dr. Majer, Dr. Baillet, Dr. Tranbaloc, Dr. Jacquot, Dr. Munz Beaugrand, Dr. Truc, Dr. Jarlaud, Dr. Chevallier, Dr. Zago, Dr. Zogliani, Dr. Cohen-Aloro, Dr. Signon, Dr. Le Vagueres, Dr. De Tayrac, Dr. Pinteaux, Dr. Lelarge, Dr. Sambor, Dr. Treilleux, Dr. Marceau, and Dr. Rousseau.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippe Morice MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koskas, M., Uzan, C., Gouy, S. et al. Prognostic Factors of a Large Retrospective Series of Mucinous Borderline Tumors of the Ovary (Excluding Peritoneal Pseudomyxoma). Ann Surg Oncol 18, 40–48 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1293-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1293-8

Keywords

Navigation