Aesthetics in Breast Conserving Therapy: Do Objectively Measured Results Match Patients’ Evaluations?
- 293 Downloads
To analyze the relationship of objective and subjective evaluation tools of breast aesthetics, we compare the results of the BCCT.core (breast cancer conservative treatment.cosmetic results) software, a semiautomated objective symmetry evaluation tool, with those of the Aesthetic Status of the BCTOS (Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale) patient questionnaire.
Materials and Methods
We included 128 patients with one-sided, primary breast cancer, treated conservatively in a prospective, exploratory study in order to assess the inter-rater reliability of the BCCT.core and the agreement between the BCCT.core and the BCTOS preoperatively, shortly and 1 year after surgery. Therefore, we use agreement rates, multiple (mk), and weighted (wk) kappa coefficients as statistical methods. Furthermore, we analyzed patient-, tumor-, and therapy-related variables as possible covariates to explain agreement.
The inter-rater reliability for the semiautomated BCCT.core is very good with agreement rates up to 84% (mk = 0.80). The agreement rates of the BCCT.core and the BCTOS Aesthetic Status range between 35 and 44% subject to the different times of assessment (wk = 0.34 at best). Moreover, the patients judge their aesthetic outcome more positively than the software. None of the considered patient-, tumor-, and therapy-related covariates turned out to explain agreement.
The BCCT.core is a reliable instrument that shows fair agreement with patient’s perspective.
KeywordsKappa Coefficient Nipple Aesthetic Result Agreement Rate Breast Conserve Therapy
- 2.Arenas M, Sabater S, Hernandez V, Henriquez I, Ameijide A, Anglada L, et al. Cosmetic outcome of breast conservative treatment for early stage breast cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 2006;8334–8.Google Scholar
- 3.Vrieling C, Collette L, Fourquet A, Hoogenraad WJ, Horiot JC, Jager JJ, et al. The influence of the boost in breast-conserving therapy on cosmetic outcome in the EORTC “boost versus no boost” trial. EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;45:677–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Heil J, Holl S, Golatta M, Rauch G, Rom J, Marmé F, et al. Aesthetic and functional results after breast conserving surgery as correlates of quality of life measured by a German version of the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS). Breast. 2010 [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
- 19.Cicchetti D, Allison T. A new procedure for assessing reliability of scoring eeg sleep recordings. Am J EEG Technol. 1971;11:101–9.Google Scholar