Colorectal Cancer Screening Among First-Degree Relatives of Colorectal Cancer Patients: Benefits and Barriers
- 229 Downloads
Individuals with a first-degree family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) are at increased risk of CRC. Study objectives were: (1) to estimate the proportion of first-degree relatives (FDR) of CRC patients being screened for CRC and (2) to identify predictors of screened behavior.
A questionnaire was mailed to 640 stage I–III CRC patients from a population-based registry to identify FDR. A survey was sent to 747 FDR, aged 40 or older, to assess CRC screening, knowledge, demographics, access, benefits, and barriers of CRC screening. Factor analysis was used to detect underlying constructs. Predictors of screening were explored by multivariate analysis (MVA).
There was a 54% and 51% response for patients and FDR, respectively. Among FDR, 86% were born in Canada, 94% spoke English, 93.5% had a high school education, 73% were married, and 55% were employed. The age distribution was: 40–44 years (19.7%), 45–49 (19.1%), 50–54 (16%), 55–59 (15.2%), 60–64 (9.8%), and >65 (18%). Seventy percent had undergone CRC screening with 60% adherent to current guidelines. Of those screened, 33.7% had fecal occult blood testing, 19.4% had barium enema, 10.7% had sigmoidoscopy, and 58.7% had colonoscopy. Five constructs influencing CRC screening include: salience and coherence, perceived susceptibility, response efficacy, social influence, and cancer worries. MVA determined age >50 years as the most important predictor of screening.
In this survey, 70% of FDR of CRC patients had undergone screening; age was the most important predictor. Understanding underlying constructs influencing screening behavior may improve uptake of CRC screening in this population.
KeywordsFecal Occult Blood Testing Colorectal Cancer Screening Cancer Worry Response Efficacy General Population Survey
The authors would like to acknowledge the helpful discussions regarding study design and analysis with Alberta Cancer Registry Staff as well as Dr. Elizabeth McGregor and Dr. Bejoy Thomas.
- 1.National Cancer Institute of Canada. Canadian Cancer Statistics. Toronto, Ontario; 2001.Google Scholar
- 6.Bancej C, Nichol M, Jones-McLean E et al. Prevalence and correlates of colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 50 to 74 in four Canadian provinces. Canadian Cancer Society 2009; Available from: http://www.cancer.ca/canada-wide/about%20cancer/cancer%20statistics/canadian%20cancer%20statistics/special%20topics/progress%20in%20cancer%20control%20screening.aspx?sc_lang=en.
- 9.U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002;133:573–84.Google Scholar
- 16.Dillman DA. Survey implementation. In: Dillman DA editors. Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2000. p. 149–93.Google Scholar
- 24.Center for Disease Control. Trends in screening for colorectal cancer—United States 1997 and 1999. MMWR CDC. 2001;50:162–6.Google Scholar
- 27.Cotterchio M, McKeown-Eyssen G, Sutherland H, Buchan G, Aronson M, Easson AM, et al. Ontario Familial Colon Cancer Registry: methods and first-year response rates. Chron Dis Can. 2000;21:81–6.Google Scholar
- 34.Guidelines & Protocols Advisory Committee. Detection of colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic patients. British Columbia, BC Health Services; 2004.Google Scholar
- 35.Maiman LA, Becker MH. The health belief model: origins and correlates in psychological theory. Health Educ Monogr. 1974;2:9–26.Google Scholar
- 42.Alberta Cancer Board Cancer Screening Programs. Alberta colorectal cancer screening Program. Alberta, Alberta Cancer Board; 2008.Google Scholar
- 47.Institute of Cancer Research. Colorectal cancer screening workshop report. CIHR 2006; Available from: http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/31266.html. Accessed February 2, 2008.