Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 1316–1323 | Cite as

Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy with Lymphadenectomy in Patients with Early Cervical Cancer: Our Experience

  • Mario Malzoni
  • Raffaele Tinelli
  • Francesco Cosentino
  • Annarita Fusco
  • Carmine Malzoni
Gynecologic Oncology



The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare, in a series of 127 consecutive women, the safety, morbidity, and recurrence rate of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (TLRH) with lymphadenectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy (ARH) for early cervical carcinoma.


A total of 127 consecutive patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage Ia1 (lymphvascular space involvement), Ia2, and Ib1 early cervical cancer, 65 of whom underwent TLRH and 62 of whom underwent ARH with pelvic lymph node dissection, comprised the study population. The para-aortic lymphadenectomy with the superior border of the dissection being the inferior mesenteric artery was performed in all cases with positive pelvic lymph nodes discovered at frozen section evaluation.


The median blood loss in the ARH group (145 ml; range, 60–225 ml) was significantly greater than TLRH group (55 ml; range, 30–80 ml) (P < .01). The median length of hospital stay was significantly greater in the ARH group (7 days; range, 5–9 days) than TLRH group (4 days; range, 3–7 days) (P < .01). The median operating time was 196 min in the TLRH group (range, 182–240 min) compared with 152 min in the ARH group (range, 161–240 min) (P < .01). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups when the recurrence rate was compared.


Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy is a safe and effective therapeutic procedure for management of early-stage cervical cancer with a far lower morbidity than reported for the open approach and is characterized by far less blood loss and shorter postoperative hospitalization time, although multicenter randomized clinical trials with longer follow-up are necessary to evaluate the overall oncologic outcomes of this procedure.


Pelvic Lymph Node Radical Hysterectomy Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy Early Cervical Cancer Ureterovaginal Fistula 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Nezhat CR, Nezhat Fr, Burrell MO, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy with pelvic and paraaortic node dissection. J Gynecol Surg. 1993;9:105–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pomel C, Canis M, Mage G, et al. Laparoscopically extended hysterectomy for cervix cancer: technique, indications and results. Apropos of a series of 41 cases in Clermont. Chirurgie. 1997;122:133–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Canis M, Mage G, Pouly JL, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;9:675–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Malzoni M, Tinelli R, Cosentino F, et al. Feasibility, morbidity and safety of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with limphadenectomy: our experience. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:584–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Spirtos NM, Schlaerth JB, Kimball RE, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174:1763–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer: surgical morbidity and intermediate follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:340–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee CL, Huang KG. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using Lee-Huang portal and McCartney transvaginal tube. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002;9:536–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abu-Rustum NR, Gemignani ML, Moore K, et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy using the argon-beam coagulator: pilot data and comparison to laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;91:402–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sedlacek TV, Campion MJ, Hutchins RA, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a preliminary report. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1994;1:S32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Canis M, Dauplat J, Pomel C. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: results about 41 cases [IGCS]. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1997;7.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hsieh YY, Lin WC, Chang CC, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with low paraaortic, subaortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Results of short-term follow-up. J Reprod Med. 1998;43:528–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krause N, Schneider A. [Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy]. Zentralbl Gynakol. 1995;117:346–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gerbaulet AL, Kunkler IH, Kerr GR, et al. Combined radiotherapy and surgery: local control and complications in early carcinoma of the uterine cervix—the Villejuif experience, 1975–1984. Radiother Oncol. 1992;23:66–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lin YS. Preliminary results of laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy in early invasive cervical cancer. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003;10:80–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Piver MS, Rutledge F, Smith JP. Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1974;44:265–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dargent DF. Laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Surg Clin North Am. 2001;81:949–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Canis M, Mage G, Wattiez A, et al. [Does endoscopic surgery have a role in radical surgery of cancer of the cervix uteri?]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1990;19:921.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nezhat CR, Burrell MO, Nezhat FR, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:864–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Frumovitz M, Dos Reis R, Sun CC, et al. Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:96–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li G, Yan X, Shang H. A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib–IIa cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;105:176–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gil-Moreno A, Puig O, Perez-Benavente MA, et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II–III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12:113–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Malur S, Possover M, Schneider A. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal versus radical abdominal hysterectomy type II in patients with cervical cancer. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:289–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Benjamin I, Barakat RR, Curtin JP, et al. Blood transfusion for radical hysterectomy before and after the discovery of transfusion-related human immunodeficiency virus infection. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84:974–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eisenkop SM, Spirtos NM, Montag TW, et al. The clinical significance of blood transfusion at the time of radical hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;76:110–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ayhan A, Tuncer ZS, Yarali H. Complications of radical hysterectomy in women with early stage cervical cancer: clinical analysis of 270 cases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1991;17:492–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Renaud MC, Plante M, Roy M. Combined laparoscopic and vaginal radical surgery in cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;79:59–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ramirez PT, Slomovitz BM, Soliman PT, et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;102:252–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fanning J, Hilgers RD, Palabrica C. Surgical stapling technique for radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 1994;55:179–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Covens A, Rosen B, Gibbons A, et al. Differences in the morbidity of radical hysterectomy between gynecological oncologists. Gynecol Oncol. 1993;51:39–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chen MD, Teigen GA, Reynolds HT, et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy: an evaluation of adhesion formation after pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in a porcine model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178:499–503.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lanvin D, Elhage A, Henry B, et al. Accuracy and safety of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy: an experimental prospective randomized study. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;67:83–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Malzoni M, Malzoni C, Perone C, et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2004;25:525–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario Malzoni
    • 1
  • Raffaele Tinelli
    • 1
  • Francesco Cosentino
    • 1
  • Annarita Fusco
    • 2
  • Carmine Malzoni
    • 1
  1. 1.Advanced Gynecological Endoscopy CenterMalzoni Medical CenterAvellinoItaly
  2. 2.Department of Public HealthUniversity Medical SchoolBariItaly

Personalised recommendations