Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 15, Issue 7, pp 1846–1854 | Cite as

Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes in Disease-Free Survivors of Mid-Low Rectal Cancer After Curative Surgery

  • Salvatore Pucciarelli
  • Paola Del Bianco
  • Paola Toppan
  • Samantha Serpentini
  • Fabio Efficace
  • Lara Maria Pasetto
  • Maria Luisa Friso
  • Gian Luca De Salvo
  • Donato Nitti
Healthcare Policy and Outcomes

Abstract

Background

The main objective of this study was to investigate health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in terms of symptoms and functional outcomes in disease-free survivors of rectal cancer.

Methods

Consecutive patients (n = 117) who underwent curative surgery for rectal cancer with a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up and whose disease had not recurred were asked to complete the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and its colorectal cancer module (QLQ-CR38). Long-term HRQOL outcomes were compared with reference data from the general population. Relevant clinical data including type of surgery, stage of disease, type of treatment, and early and late complications were collected. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to investigate associations among covariates.

Results

HRQOL functional aspects were similar with that of an age- and sex-matched general population. Although clinically meaningful better outcomes favoring our patients were found for the global health status/HRQOL and the pain scales, constipation was worse in rectal cancer survivors than the general population. Multivariate analysis found that worse physical functioning was associated with increasing age (P < .001), female sex (P < .01), presence of stoma (P < .05), and occurrence of late major complications (P < .05). Worse body image was associated with the presence of stoma (P < .001) and chemoradiotherapy (P < .05).

Conclusion

Overall, patients with rectal cancer recover well in the long run, with HRQOL levels comparable to that of the general population. HRQOL outcomes provide valuable data that may be used to improve information disclosure to patients.

Keywords

Health related quality of life Rectal cancer Outcome 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Supported in part by a grant from the University of Padova (Progetto di Ateneo 2003). The authors thank Marina Canapero for her assistance with English-language revision.

References

  1. 1.
    Langenhoff BS, Krabbe PFM, Wobbes T, et al. Quality of life as an outcome measure in surgical oncology. Br J Surg 2001; 88:643–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blazeby JM, Avery K, Sprangers M, et al. Health-related quality of life measurement in randomized clinical trials in surgical oncology. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24:3178–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gotay CC, Muraoka M. Quality of life in long-term survivors of adult-onset cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998; 90:656–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:638–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:1731–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele JC. Quality of life after treatment for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1998; 85:1036–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Temple LK, Bacik J, Savatta SG, et al. The development of a validated instrument to evaluate bowel function after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48:1353–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grumann MM, Noack EM, Hoffmann IA, et al. Comparison of quality of life in patients undergoing abdominoperineal extirpation or anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2001; 233:149–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hamashima C. HRQOL of postoperative rectal cancer. Long-term quality of life of postoperative rectal cancer patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002; 17:571–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rauch P, Miny J, Conroy T, et al. Quality of life among disease-free survivors of rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22:354–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Engel J, Kerr J, Schleisinger-Racib A, et al. Quality of life in rectal cancer patients: a four-year prospective study. Ann Surg 2003; 238:203–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schmidt CE, Bestmann B, Kuchler T, et al. Impact of age on quality of life in patients with rectal cancer. World J Surg 2005; 29:190–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    AJCC American Joint Committee on Cancer. Fleming DI, Cooper SJ, Henson ED, et al. (eds). AJCC cancer staging manual. 5th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997:83–90Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Urso E, Serpentini S, Pucciarelli S, et al. Complications, functional outcome and quality of life after intensive preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2006; 32:1201–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pucciarelli S, Toppan P, Friso ML, et al. Complete pathologic response following preoperative chemoradiation therapy for middle to lower rectal cancer is not a prognostic factor for a better outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47:1798–807PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85:365–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sprangers MAG, te Velde A, Aaronson NK. The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Module (QLQ-CR38). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life. Eur J Cancer 1999; 35:238–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cull A, Sprangers M, Bjordal K, et al. EORTC quality of life group translation procedure. 2nd edition. Brussels: EORTC Publications, 2002Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fayers P, Aaronson N, Bjordal K, et al. EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual. 2nd edition. Brussels, Belgium: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, 1999Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schwarz R, Hinz A. Reference data for the quality of life questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 in the general German population. Eur J Cancer 2001; 37:1345–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Bjordal K, et al. Using reference data on quality of life—the importance of adjusting for age and gender, exemplified by the EORTC QLQ-C30 (+3). Eur J Cancer 1998; 34:1381–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J, et al. Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16:139–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Neumann HB, Schrag D, Cabral C, et al. Can differences in bowel function after surgery for rectal cancer be identified by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life instruments? Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14:1735–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Arndt V, Merx H, Stegmaier C, et al. Restrictions in quality of life in colorectal cancer patients over three years after diagnosis: a population based study. Eur J Cancer 2006; 42:1848–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Arndt V, Merx H, Stegmaier C, et al. Quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer 1 year after diagnosis compared with the general population: a population-based study. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22:4829–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sprangers MAG, Schwartz CE. the challenge of response shift for quality-of-life-based clinical oncology research. Ann Oncol 1999; 10:747–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Guren MG, Dueland S, Skovlund E, et al. Quality of life during radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 2003; 39:587–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hendren SK, O’Connor BI, Liu M, et al. Prevalence of male and famale sexual dysfunction is high following surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2005; 242:212–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marijnen CAM, van de Velde CJH, Putter H, et al. Impact of short-term preoperative radiotherapy on health-related quality of life and sexual functioning in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:1847–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Guren MG, Eriksen MT, Wiig JN, et al. on behalf of the Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group. Quality of life and functional outcome following anterior or abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005; 31:735–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hagedoorn M, Sneeuw KCA, Aaronson N. Changes in physical functioning and quality of life in patients with cancer: response shift and relative evaluation of one’s condition. J Clin Epidemiol 2002; 55:176–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bernhard J, Hürny C, Maibach R. Quality of life as subjective experience: reframing of perception in patients with colon cncer undergoing radical resection with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK). Ann Oncol 1999; 10:775–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sprangers MA, Schwartz CE. Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48:1507–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Allal AB, Gervaz P, Gertsch P, et al. Assessment of quality of life in patients with rectal cancer treated by preoperative radiotherapy: a longitudinal prospective study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 61:1129–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Apolone G, Mosconi P. The Italian SF-36 Health Survey: translation, validation and norming. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51:1025–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Apolone G, Filiberti A, Cifani S, et al. Evaluation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire: a comparison with SF-36 health survey in a cohort of Italian long-survival cancer patients. Ann Oncol 1998; 9:549–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Salvatore Pucciarelli
    • 1
  • Paola Del Bianco
    • 2
  • Paola Toppan
    • 1
  • Samantha Serpentini
    • 1
  • Fabio Efficace
    • 3
  • Lara Maria Pasetto
    • 4
  • Maria Luisa Friso
    • 5
  • Gian Luca De Salvo
    • 2
  • Donato Nitti
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Oncological and Surgical Sciences, Section of Clinica Chirurgica IIUniversity of PadovaPadovaItaly
  2. 2.Servizio Sperimentazioni Cliniche e BiostatisticaIstituto Oncologico Veneto—IRCCSPadovaItaly
  3. 3.Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Diseases (GIMEMA) Data CenterHealth Outcome Research UnitRomeItaly
  4. 4.Medical Oncology DepartmentIstituto Oncologico Veneto—IRCCSPadovaItaly
  5. 5.Radiation Oncology DepartmentIstituto Oncologico Veneto—IRCCSPadovaItaly

Personalised recommendations