Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Matched Pair Analyses of Stage IV Breast Cancer with or Without Resection of Primary Breast Site

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Reports demonstrate improved survival of stage IV breast cancer patients with primary cancer resection. This may result from selection for surgery, rather than biological processes.

Methods

We performed matched-pair analysis that minimized potential bias in selecting surgery for primary cancer. Chart review was also performed of 5-year survivors to assess selection bias affecting breast surgery.

Results

19,464 breast cancer patients were identified; 808 (4.2%) were stage IV: 622 were analyzed after eliminating wrong diagnoses or staging, and limiting patients to Massachusetts residents.

Matched-pair analysis narrowed or eliminated apparent survival benefit associated with primary site surgery in several comparisons. When the impact of the sequence of systemic and surgical treatments was studied in stage IV patients, 90% 2-year survival occurred in patients receiving chemotherapy first, in contrast to receiving chemotherapy simultaneously with or after surgery, suggesting selection for delayed surgery after excellent response to initial chemotherapy. In bone metastases, the 2-year survival advantage occurred with chemotherapy before surgery; no difference in survival with or without surgery occurred when these treatments were simultaneous.

Among 5-year survivors, frequency of primary site surgery after excellent response to systemic therapy, breast surgery in stage III patients incorrectly classified as stage IV, and frequency of oligo metastases all indicated selection bias.

Conclusions

Case selection bias in primary breast cancer resection in state IV patients may explain most, if not all, the apparent survival advantage of such surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Khan SA, Steward AK, Morrow M. Does aggressive local therapy improve survival in metastatic breast cancer? Surgery 2002;132:620–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Singletary SE, Walsh G, Vauthey JN, et al. A role for curative surgery in the treatment of selected patients with metastatic breast cancer. The Oncologist 2003;8:241–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Carmichael AR, Anderson EDC, Chetty U, et al. Does local surgery have a role in the management of stage IV breast cancer? Eur J Surg Oncol 2003;29:17–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Babiera GV, Rao R, Feng L, et al. Effect of primary tumor extirpation in breast cancer patients who present with stage IV disease and an intact primary tumor. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13:776–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rapiti E, Verkooijen HM, Vlastos G, et al. Complete excision of primary breast tumor improves survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer at diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:2743–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gnerlich J, Jeffe DB, Deshpande AD, et al. Surgical removal of the primary tumor increases overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer: analysis of the 1988–2003 SEER data. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:2187–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fields RC, Jeffe DB, Trinkaus K, et al. Surgical resection of the primary tumor is associated with increased long-term survival in patients with stage IV breast cancer after controlling for site of metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:3345–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barkley CR, Bafford AC, Burstein HJ, et al. Breast surgery for women presenting with stage IV breast cancer. 5085 Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA; Dana Faber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

  9. Shien T, Kinoshita T, Shimizu C, et al. Can the resection of primary breast cancer improve survival of patients with stage IV breast cancer? 5086 National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

  10. Dooley WC. A surgical indication in incurable breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2005;13:759–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Khan SA, Lurie RH. Does resection of an intact breast primary improve survival in metastatic breast cancer? Oncology 2007;21:924–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Khan SA. Primary tumor resection in stage IV breast cancer: consistent benefit, or consistent bias? Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:3285–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Morrogh M, Borgen PI, King TA. The importance of local control in early-stage breast cancer: a historical review and a discussion of ongoing issues. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:3310–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brito RA, Valero VV, Buzdar AU, et al. Long-term results of combined-modality therapy for locally advanced breast cancer with ipsilateral supraclavicular metastases: The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:628–33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. In: Greene FK, Page D, Fleming ID, Fritz AG, Balch CM, Haller DG, Morrow M, eds. 6th edition. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2002

  16. Chen SC, Chang HK, Lin YC, et al. Prognosis of breast cancer after supraclavicular lymph node metastasis: not a distant metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol 2006 Sep 8; [Epub ahead of print]

  17. Nathan H, Pawlik TM. Limitations of claims and registry data in surgical oncology research. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15:415–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Tomlinson JS, et al. Impact of adjuvant radiation on survival: a note of caution when using cancer registry data to evaluate adjuvant treatments. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:3321–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vlastos G, Smith DL, Singletary ES, et al. Long-term survival after an aggressive surgical approach in patients with breast cancer hepatic metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2004;11:869–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Adam R, Aloia T, Krissat J, et al. Is liver resection justified for patients with hepatic metastases from breast cancer? Ann Surg 2006;244:897–908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Thelen A, Benckert C, Jonas S, et al. Liver resection for metastases from breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 2007 Nov 27 [Epub ahead of print]

  22. Planchard D, Soria JC, Michiels S, et al. Uncertain benefit from surgery in patients with lung metastases from breast carcinoma. Cancer 2004;100:28–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rena O, Papalia E, Ruffini E, et al. The role of surgery in the management of solitary pulmonary nodule in breast cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 2007 Jan 29; [Epub ahead of print]

  24. Yoshimoto M, Tada K, Nishimura S, et al. Favourable long-term results after surgical removal of lung metastases of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007 Sep 27; [Epub ahead of print]

  25. Pieper DR, Hess KR, Sawaya RE. Role of surgery in the treatment of brain metastases in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 1996;4:481–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee SS, Ahn JH, Kim MK, et al. Brain metastases in breast cancer: prognostic factors and management. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007 Nov 8; [Epub ahead of print]

  27. Sherry MM, Greco FA, Johnson DH, et al. Metastatic breast cancer confined to the skeletal system. Am J Med 1986;81:381–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. James JJ, Evans AJ, Pinder SE, et al. Bone metastases from breast carcinoma: histopathological–radiological correlations and prognostic features. Br J Cancer 2003;89:660–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Briasoulis E, Karavasilis V, Kostadima L, et al. Metastatic breast carcinoma confined to bone – a portrait of a clinical entity. Cancer 2004;101:1524–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rades D, Veninga Stalpers LJA, et al. Outcome after radiotherapy alone for metastatic spinal cord compression in patients with oligometastases. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:50–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Solomayer EF, Diel IJ, Meyberg GC, et al. Metastatic breast cancer: clinical course, prognosis and therapy related to the first site of metastasis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2000;59:271–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Imkampe A, Bendall S, Bates T. The significance of the site of recurrence to subsequent breast cancer survival. EJSO 2006. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2006.09.005

  33. Giordano SH, Buzdar AU, Smith TL, et al. Is breast cancer survival improving? Cancer 2004;100:44–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Andre F, Slimane K, Bachelot T, et al. Breast cancer with synchronous metastases: trends in survival during a 14-year period. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:3302–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gennari A, Conte P, Rosso R, et al. Survival of metastatic breast carcinoma patients over a 20-year period. A retrospective analysis based on individual patient data from six consecutive studies. Cancer 2005;104:1742–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hortobagyi GN. Can we cure limited metastatic breast cancer? J Clin Oncol 2001;20:620–3

    Google Scholar 

  37. Amoroso V, Valcamonico F, Simoncini E, et al. A retrospective series of long-term survivors of metastatic breast cancer in complete remission. Oncology 2005;68:48–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cady B. Basic brinciples in surgical oncology. Arch Surg 1997;132:338–46

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Gillette Center for Breast Cancer, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    B. Cady MD, N. R. Nathan BS, J. S. Michaelson PhD, M. Golshan MD & B. L. Smith MD, PhD

  2. Cambridge Hospital, Cambridge, MA, USA

    B. Cady MD

  3. 24 Walnut Place, Brookline, MA, 02445, USA

    B. Cady MD

  4. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

    N. R. Nathan BS

  5. Gillette Center for Breast Cancer, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    J. S. Michaelson PhD & B. L. Smith MD, PhD

  6. Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA

    J. S. Michaelson PhD

  7. Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    M. Golshan MD

Authors
  1. B. Cady MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. R. Nathan BS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. S. Michaelson PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Golshan MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. B. L. Smith MD, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Cady MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cady, B., Nathan, N.R., Michaelson, J.S. et al. Matched Pair Analyses of Stage IV Breast Cancer with or Without Resection of Primary Breast Site. Ann Surg Oncol 15, 3384–3395 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0085-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0085-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation