Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Superficial Margin of the Skin-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Carcinoma: Factors Predicting Involvement and Efficacy of Additional Margin Sampling

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

No study has systematically evaluated the significance of involvement of the superficial specimen margin in skin-sparing mastectomies (SSMs).

Methods

168 SSMs with a small, additional superficial margin (ASM) specimen taken directly over the tumor to the dermis intraoperatively were studied.

Results

64 SSMs (38%) had a positive superficial specimen margin but only 13 (20%) of these had residual breast carcinoma in ASMs. Only 1 of 104 SSMs with a negative superficial specimen margin had residual breast carcinoma in its ASM (P < 0.05). ASM sampling rendered the final true margin directly over the tumor negative in 54 of 58 (93%) SSMs with a focally positive superficial specimen margin, but did not negate the nonfocally positive superficial specimen margin in six other cases. In SSMs with a positive superficial specimen margin, multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of extensive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in the SSM and a thicker ASM specimen were the only independent factors predictive of residual breast carcinoma in ASM. Eighty-nine (53%) ASMs contained benign breast tissue.

Conclusions

Superficial specimen margins in SSMs are often microscopically positive and approximately half of ASMs contain benign breast tissue, likely reflecting the difficulty in completely removing breast tissue near the skin flaps in SSMs. ASM sampling effectively decreases positive superficial specimen margins directly over the tumor in SSMs, but fails to account for positive superficial specimen margins in other quadrants in patients with multicentric disease, especially extensive DCIS. Patients whose superficial margins remain positive could potentially represent a subset of patients for whom postmastectomy radiation is beneficial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Toth BA, Lapport P. Modified skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 87:1048–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cunnick GH, Mokbel K. Skin-sparing mastectomy. Am J Surg 2004; 188:78–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Salhab M, al Sarakbi W, Joseph A, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: patient satisfaction and clinical outcome. Int J Clin Oncol 2006; 11:51–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Spiegel AJ, Butler CE. Recurrence following treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ with skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111:706–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Torresan RZ, Cabello Dos Santos C, Brenelli H, et al. Residual glandular tissue after skin-sparing mastectomies. Breast J 2005; 11:374–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cao D, Lin C, Woo SH, et al. Separate cavity margin sampling at the time of initial breast lumpectomy significantly reduces the need for reexcisions. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29:1625–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dooley WC, Parker J. Understanding the mechanisms creating false positive lumpectomy margins. Am J Surg 2005; 190:606–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schnitt SJ, Connolly JL. Processing and evaluation of breast excision specimens. A clinically oriented approach. Am J Clin Pathol 1992; 98:125–37

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schnitt SJ, Abner A, Gelman R, et al. The relationship between microscopic margins of resection and the risk of local recurrence in patients with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy. Cancer 1994; 74:1746–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Torresan RZ, Cabello Dos Santos C, Okamura H, et al. Evaluation of residual glandular tissue after skin-sparing mastectomies. Ann Surg Oncol 2005; 12:1037–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Slavin SA, Schnitt SJ, Duda RB, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction: oncologic risks and aesthetic results in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998: 102:49–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Beer GM, Varga Z, Budi S, et al. Incidence of the superficial fascia and its relevance in skin-sparing mastectomy. Cancer 2002; 94:1619–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ho CM, Mak CK, Lau Y, et al. Skin involvement in invasive breast carcinoma: safety of skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10:102–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gupta SK, Douglas-Jones AG, Fenn N, et al. The clinical behavior of breast carcinoma is probably determined at the preinvasive stage (ductal carcinoma in situ). Cancer 1997; 80:1740–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Salas AP, Helvie MA, Wilkins EG, et al. Is mammography useful in screening for local recurrences in patients with TRAM flap breast reconstruction after mastectomy for multifocal DCIS? Ann Surg Oncol 1998; 5:456–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Carlson GW, Page A, Johnson E, et al. Local recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ after skin-sparing mastectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204:1074–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Carlson GW, Styblo TM, Lyles RH, et al. Local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy: tumor biology or surgical conservatism? Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10:108–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fersis N, Hoenig A, Relakis K, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: incidence of recurrence in patients with invasive breast cancer. Breast 2004; 13:488–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kroll SS, Khoo A, Singletary SE, et al. Local recurrence risk after skin-sparing and conventional mastectomy: a 6-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104:421–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Medina-Franco H, Vasconez LO, Fix RJ, et al. Factors associated with local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg 2002; 235:814–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Newman LA, Kuerer HM, Hunt KK, et al. Presentation, treatment, and outcome of local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 1998; 5:620–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rivadeneira DE, Simmons RM, Fish SK, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: a critical analysis of local recurrence. Cancer J 2000; 6:331–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Barton FE, English JM, Kingsley WB, et al. Glandular excision in total glandular mastectomy and modified radical mastectomy: a comparison. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 88:389–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Carlson GW, Bostwick J, Styblo TM, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy. Oncologic and reconstructive considerations. Ann Surg 1997; 225:570–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Donegan WL, Perez-Mesa CM, Watson FR. A biostatistical study of locally recurrent breast carcinoma. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1966; 122:529–40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gilliland MD, Barton RM, Copeland EM. The implications of local recurrence of breast cancer as the first site of therapeutic failure. Ann Surg 1983; 197:284–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Singletary SE. Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Ann Surg Oncol 1996; 3:411–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Vaughan A, Dietz JR, Aft R, et al. Patterns of local breast cancer recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Am J Surg 2007; 194:438–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, et al. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 2005 17; 366:2087–106

    Google Scholar 

  30. Langstein HN, Cheng MH, Singletary SE, et al. Breast cancer recurrence after immediate reconstruction: patterns and significance. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111:712–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedram Argani MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cao, D., Tsangaris, T.N., Kouprina, N. et al. The Superficial Margin of the Skin-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Carcinoma: Factors Predicting Involvement and Efficacy of Additional Margin Sampling. Ann Surg Oncol 15, 1330–1340 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9795-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9795-8

Keywords

Navigation