Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Partial Penectomy for Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis: The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Experience

  • Urologic Oncology
  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To present our institution’s experience with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the penis, with analysis of oncologic efficacy and survival.

Methods

Between 1989 and 2005, we identified 32 consecutive patients (median age, 61 years) with SCC of the penis managed with partial penectomy. Clinicopathologic variables were examined, and overall and disease-specific survival were determined.

Results

Pathologic stage of the primary tumor was pTis in 1 patient (3%), pT1 in 11 (34%), pT2 in 16 (50%), and pT3 in 4 (13%). Pathologic grade was well differentiated in 9 patients (28%), moderately differentiated in 20 (63%), and poorly differentiated in 2 (6%). Twenty-five patients (78%) underwent inguinal lymph node dissection, with 15 (60%) demonstrating nodal metastases. Twenty-two patients (69%) underwent pelvic lymph node dissection; 21 were negative for pelvic nodal metastases, and 1 had grossly positive nodes. One patient developed local recurrence. After a mean follow-up of 34 months, overall survival was 56%. Numbers of patients alive and disease-free were 9 and 11 in the low-stage and advanced-stage groups, and 8 and 12 in the well and moderately differentiated groups, respectively. Both patients with poorly differentiated disease died of disease within 12 months from presentation.

Conclusions

Partial penectomy for SCC of the penis provides excellent local control, with low recurrence rate, and acceptable maintenance of urinary and sexual function. Outcomes are generally poor, however, for patients with regional metastases, even in moderately differentiated disease. Future studies are needed to identify a reliable method of predicting regional metastases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIG. 1.
FIG. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics 2006. CA Cancer J Clin 2006;56:106–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Narayana AS, Olney LE, Loening SA, et al. Carcinoma of the penis: analysis of 219 cases. Cancer 1982;49:2185–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McDougal WS. Advances in the treatment of carcinoma of the penis. Urology 2005;66:114–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McDougal WS. Phallic preserving surgery in patients with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. J Urol 2005;174:2218–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pietrzak P, Corbishley C, Watkin N. Organ-sparing surgery for invasive penile cancer: early follow-up data. BJU Int 2004;94:1253–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mazza ON, Cheliz GM. Glanuloplasty with scrotal flap for partial penectomy. J Urol 2001;166:887–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Davis JW, Schellhammer PF, Schlossberg SM. Conservative surgical therapy for penile and urethral carcinoma. Urology 1999;53:386–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Russo P, Horenblas S. Comprehensive Textbook of Genitourinary Oncology. 3rd ed. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  9. Russo P, Saldana EF, Yu S, Chaglasian T, et al. Myocutaneous flaps in genitourinary oncology. J Urol 1994;151:920–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Fritz A, Balch CM, Haller DG, et al. (eds) Penis. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. New York: Springer 2002:303

  11. Lont AP, Gallee MP, Meinhardt W, et al. Penis conserving treatment for T1 and T2 penile carcinoma: clinical implications of a local recurrence. J Urol 2006;176:575–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoffman MA, Renshaw AA, Loughlin KR. Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis and microscopic pathologic margins: how much margin is needed for local cure? Cancer 1999;85:1565–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Minhas S, Kayes O, Hegarty P, et al. What surgical resection margins are required to achieve oncological control in men with primary penile cancer? BJU Int 2005;96:1040–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Agrawal A, Pai D, Ananthakrishnan N, et al. The histological extent of the local spread of carcinoma of the penis and its therapeutic implications. BJU Int 2000;85:299–301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McDougal WS, Kirchner FK Jr, Edwards RH, et al. Treatment of carcinoma of the penis: the case for primary lymphadenectomy. J Urol 1986;136:38–41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ficarra V, D’Amico A, Cavalleri S, et al. Surgical treatment of penile carcinoma: our experience from 1976 to 1997. Urol Int 1999;62:234–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. D’Ancona CA, Botega NJ, De Moraes C, et al. Quality of life after partial penectomy for penile carcinoma. Urology 1997;50:593–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Opjordsmoen S, Fossa SD. Quality of life in patients treated for penile cancer. A follow-up study. Br J Urol 1994;74:652–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Romero FR, Romero KR, Mattos MA, et al. Sexual function after partial penectomy for penile cancer. Urology 2005;66:1292–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Theodorescu D, Russo P, Zhang ZF, et al. Outcomes of initial surveillance of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis and negative nodes. J Urol 1996;155:1626–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bouchot O, Rigaud J, Maillet F, et al. Morbidity of inguinal lymphadenectomy for invasive penile carcinoma. Eur Urol 2004;45:761–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kroon BK, Horenblas S, Meinhardt W, et al. Dynamic sentinel node biopsy in penile carcinoma: evaluation of 10 years experience. Eur Urol 2005;47:601–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Supported by AFUD/AUAER Research Scholar Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Russo MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Korets, R., Koppie, T.M., Snyder, M.E. et al. Partial Penectomy for Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis: The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Experience. Ann Surg Oncol 14, 3614–3619 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9563-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9563-9

Keywords

Navigation