Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 470–477 | Cite as

Prognostic Significance of Immunohistochemically Detected Blood and Lymphatic Vessel Invasion in Colorectal Carcinoma: Its Impact on Prognosis

  • Pin Liang
  • Ichiro Nakada
  • Jian-Wei Hong
  • Takanobu Tabuchi
  • Gyo Motohashi
  • Akira Takemura
  • Takeshi Nakachi
  • Teruhiko Kasuga
  • Takafumi Tabuchi
Article

Abstract

Background

The prognostic significance of blood vessel invasion (BVI) and lymphatic vessel invasion (LVI) is unclear. Because of the absence of specific markers for venous and lymphatic vessels, earlier studies could not reliably distinguish between BVI and LVI.

Methods

By immunostaining for podoplanin and CD34 antigen, we retrospectively investigated LVI and BVI in 419 tissue specimens of colorectal carcinoma. We performed univariate and multivariate analysis of the clinicopathologic features, frequency of recurrence, and outcome of patients with or without LVI and BVI.

Results

The use of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining to identify BVI and LVI yielded a false positive rate of 9.1% and false negative rate of 12.6%. The incidence of BVI was significantly higher among tumors with LVI than tumors without LVI (P <.001). In logistic multivariate analysis, only LVI (P < .001) was associated with lymph node metastasis and BVI (P = .015) was associated with distant recurrence. Calculating the prognostic relevance, both two invasion types correlated with decreased survival in univariate analysis (both P <.001). In multivariate analysis, BVI (P =.024), lymph node status (P =.003) and tumor stage (P <.001) remained statistically significant factors for survival.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that immunohistologic evaluation of BVI and LVI could be useful in colorectal carcinoma indicating the risk of lymph node metastasis and recurrence, thereby contributing to prognostic evaluation.

Keywords

Colorectal carcinoma Blood vessel invasion Lymphatic vessel invasion Prognosis CD34 Podoplanin 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Tsutomu Kohda for technical assistance and are grateful to Prof. J. Patrick Barron of the International Medical Communications Center of Tokyo Medical University for his review of this manuscript. This work was supported by the Tokyo Medical University Cancer Foundation (200409).

References

  1. 1.
    Sakuragi N, Takeda N, Hareyama H, Fujimoto T, Todo Y, Okamoto K. A multivariate analysis of blood vessel and lymph vessel invasion as predictors of ovarian and lymph node metastases in patients with cervical carcinoma. Cancer 2000; 88:2578–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Katharina S, Peter B, Verena G, Adelheid E, Silvana G. Prognostic Value of Lymphatic and Blood Vessel Invasion in Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Lung. Am J surg pathol 2005; 25:324–8Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Minsky BD, Mies C, Rich TA, Recht A. Lymphatic vessel invasion is an independent prognostic factor for survival in colorectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1989; 17:311–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sternberg A, Amar M, Alfici R, Groisman G. Conclusions from a study of venous invasion in stage IV colorectal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Pathol 2002; 55:17–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krasna MJ, Flancbaum L, Cody RP, Shneibaum S, Ari GB. Vascular and neural invasion in colorectral carcinoma - incidence and prognostic significance. Cancer 1988; 61:1018–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Compton C, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Pettigrew N, Fielding LP. American Joint Committee on Cancer Prognostic Factors Consensus Conference: Colorectal Working Group. Cancer 2000; 88:1739–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Breiteneder-Geleff S, Soleiman A, Kowalski H, et al. Angiosarcomas express mixed endothelial phenotypes of blood and lymphatic capillaries: Podoplanin as a specific marker for lymphatic endothelium. Am J Pathol 1999; 154:385–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Valencak J, Heere-Ress E, T kopp, Schoppmann SF, Kittler H, Pehamberger H. Selective immunohistochemical staining shows significant prognostic influence of lymphatic and blood vessels in patients with malignant melanoma. European journal of cancer 2004; 40:358–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jass JR, Sobin LH. (1989) World Health Organization international histological classification of the tumors: histological typing of intestinal tumors. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-verlagGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Astler VB, Coller FA. The prognostic significance of direct extension of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Ann Surg 1954 139(6):846–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ono M, Sakamoto M, Ino Y, et al. Cancer cell morphology at the invasive front and expression of cell adhesion-related carbohydrate in the primary lesion of patients with colorectal carcinoma with liver metastasis. Cancer 1996; 78:1179–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hase K, Shatney C, Johnson D, Trollope M, Vierra M. Prognostic value of tumor “budding” in patients with colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1993 36(7):627–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liang P, Hong JW, Ubukata H, et al. Myofibroblasts correlates with lymphatic microvessel density and lymph node metastasis in early-stage invasive colorectal carcinoma. Anticancer Res 2005; 25:2705–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liang P, Hong JW, Ubukata H, et al. Increased density and diameter of lymphatic microvessels correlate with lymph node metastasis in early stage invasive colorectal carcinoma. Virchows Archiv 2006; 448:570–575PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wiggers T, Arends JW, Volovics A. Regression analysis of prognostic factors in colorectal cancer after curative resections. Dis Colon Rectum 1988 31(1):33–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chapuis PH, Dent OF, Fisher R, et al. A multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological variables in prognosis after resection of large bowel cancer. Br J Surg 1985 72 (9):698–702PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    De Vita VT, Hellman SL, Rosenberg SA, eds. Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology. Philadephia. JB Lippincott, 2001Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sternberg A, Amar M, Alfici R, Groisman G. Conclusions from a study of venous invasion in stage IV colorectal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Pathol 2002; 55(1):17–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Minsky B, Mies C. The clinical significance of vascular invasion in colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1989; 32(9):794–803PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Talbot IC, Ritchie S, Leighton MH, Hughes AO, Bussey HJ, Morson BC. Spread of rectal cancer within veins. Histologic features and clinical significance. Am J Surg 1981; 141(1):15–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kim JC, Roh SA, Lee KH, Namgung H, Kim JR, Kim JS. Genetic and pathologic changes associated with lymphovascular invasion of colorectal adenocarcinoma. Clin Exp Metastasis 2005; 22(5):421–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brodsky JT, Richard GK, Cohen AM, Minsky BD. Variables correlated with the risk of lymph node metastasis in early rectal cancer. Cancer 1992; 69(2):322–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Saclarides TJ, Bhattacharyya AK, Britton-Kuzel C, Szeluga D, Economou SG. Predicting lymph node metastases in rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1994 ; 37(1):52–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bayar S, Saxena R, Emir B, Salem RR. Venous invasion may predict lymph node metastasis in early rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2002; 28(4):413–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schoppmann SF, Bayer G, Aumayr K, et al. Prognostic value of lymphangiogenesis and lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg 2004; 240(2):306–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shirouzu K, Isomoto H, Kakegawa T, Morimatsu M. A prospective clinicopathologic study of venous invasion in colorectal cancer. Am J Surg 1991; 162(3):216–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Meguerditchian AN, Bairati I, Lagace R, Harel F, Kibrite A. Prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in surgically cured rectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 2005; 189(6):707–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Horn A, Dahl O, Morild I. Venous and neural invasion as predictors of recurrence in rectal adenocarcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34(9):798–804PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mandriota SJ, Jussila L, Jeltsch M, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor-C-mediated lymphangiogenesis promotes tumour metastasis. EMBO J 2001; 20(4):672–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    He Y, Karpanen T, Alitalo K. Role of lymphangiogenic factors in tumor metastasis. BBA 2004; 1654:3–12PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pin Liang
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  • Ichiro Nakada
    • 1
  • Jian-Wei Hong
    • 3
  • Takanobu Tabuchi
    • 1
  • Gyo Motohashi
    • 1
  • Akira Takemura
    • 1
  • Takeshi Nakachi
    • 1
  • Teruhiko Kasuga
    • 1
  • Takafumi Tabuchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Fourth Department of SurgeryTokyo Medical University Kasumigaura HospitalAmiJapan
  2. 2.Department of General SurgeryFirst Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical UniversityDalianChina
  3. 3.Department of PathologyTokyo Medical University Kasumigaura HospitalAmiJapan
  4. 4.Fourth Department of SurgeryTokyo Medical University Kasumigaura HospitalAmiJapan

Personalised recommendations