Skip to main content
Log in

Perioperative Morbidity and Mortality in Elderly Gynecological Oncological Patients (≥70 Years) by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classes

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the morbidity and mortality associated with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classes III and IV versus ASA classes I and II in elderly women (≥70 years) undergoing gynecological oncological surgery.

Methods: From 1986 to 2000, we retrospectively collected patients ≥70 years of age undergoing oncological gynecological surgery. The study population consisted of 121 ASA class III and IV patients. The control group consisted of the same number of patients with ASA classes I and II, and these were matched to study patients (1:1) by clinical and surgical data. The morbidity and mortality of patients with ASA status III and IV were analyzed before and after 1992.

Results: In ASA class III and IV patients, compared with ASA class I and II, a higher rate of severe morbidity (P = .000) occurred, whereas the median postoperative stay was similar (8 days). No differences between patients with ASA class III and IV and ASA class I and II for median operative time, transfusion rate, or median blood loss were found. Mortality was 3% in ASA classes III and IV.

Conclusions: Our study suggests that surgery in elderly gynecological oncological patients aged ≥70 years with ASA class III or IV results in an acceptable perioperative morbidity and mortality rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baranovsky A, Myers MH. Cancer incidence and survival in patients 65 years of age and older. CA Cancer J Clin 1986;36:26–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yancik R. Cancer burden in the aged: an epidemiologic and demographic overview. Cancer 1997;80:1273–1283.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. United Nations Department for Economic and Social Information and Policy Analysis, Population Division. World Population Prospects: The 1994 Revision. Document ST/ESA/SER/A/145. New York: United Nations, 1995.

  4. Turner NJ, Haward RA, Mulley GP, Selby PJ. Cancer in old age is inadequately investigated and treated?. BMJ 1999;319:309–312.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Monfardini S. What do we know on variables influencing clinical decision-making in elderly cancer patients?. Eur J Cancer 1996;32A:12–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Massad LS, Vogler G, Herzog TJ, Mutch DG. Correlates of length in gynecologic oncologic patients undergoing surgery. Gynecol Oncol 1993;51:214–218.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Susini T, Scambia G, Margariti PA, et al. Gynecologic oncologic surgery in the elderly: a retrospective analysis of 213 patients. Gynecol Oncol 1999;76:287–289.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nusbaum NJ. How do geriatric patients recover from surgery?. South Med J 1996;89:950–957.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lawton FG, Hacker NF. Surgery for invasive gynecologic cancer in the elderly female population. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76:287–289.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kennedy AW, Plagg JS, Webster KD. Gynecologic cancer in the elderly. Gynecol Oncol 1989;32:49–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Walsh TH. Audit of outcome of major surgery in the elderly. Br J Surg 1996;93:92–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fuchtner C, Manetta A, Walker JL, Emma D, Berman M, Di Saia PJ. Radical hysterectomy in the elderly patient: analysis of morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:593–597.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. De Rijke DM, Schouten LJ, Volovics A, Van Der Puttens HWHM. Age specific differences in treatment and survival of ovarian cancer patients in the province of Limberg, The Netherlands 1986–1992. Int J Gynecol Cancer 1998;8:150–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hightower RD, Nguyen HN, Averette HE, Hoskins W, Harrison T, Sterem A. National survey of ovarian carcinoma IV: pattern of care and related survival for older patients. Cancer 1994;73:377–383.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gloecker Ries LA. Ovarian cancer. Survival and treatment differences by age. Cancer 1993;71:524–529.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ceccaroni M, D’Agostino G, Ferrandina G, et al. Gynecological malignancies in the elderly patients: is age 70 a limit to standard-dose chemotherapy? An Italian retrospective toxicity multicentric study. Gynecol Oncol 2002;85:445–450.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nordin AJ, Dixon S, Chinn DJ, Naik R, Lopes AdB, Monaghan JM. Attitudes to radical gynecologic oncologic surgery in the elderly: pilot study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2000;10:323–329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Monfardini S, Aapro M, Ferrucci L, Zagonel V, Scalliet P, Fentiman I. Commission of the European Communities “Europe Against Cancer” Programme. European School of Oncology advisory report. Cancer treatment in the elderly. Eur J Cancer 1993;16:2325–2330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lewin I, Lerner AG, Green SH, Del Guercio LRM, Siegel JH. Physical class and physiologic status in the prediction of operative mortality in the aged sick. Ann Surg 1971;174:217–231.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaplan JA. Thoracic Anesthesia. 2nd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1991:143–57, C6.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kaplan JA. Thoracic Anesthesia. 2nd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1991:1–16, C1.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Benedetti-Panici P, Scambia G, Baiocchi G, Maneschi F, Greggi S, Mancuso S. Radical hysterectomy: a randomized study comparing two techniques for resection of the cardinal ligament. Gynecol Oncol 1993;50:226–231.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Benedetti-Panici P, Maneschi F, Cutillo G, et al. Modified type IV-V radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy in the treatment of patients with stage III cervical carcinoma. Cancer 1996;78:2359–2365.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Benedetti-Panici P, Maneschi F, Scambia G, Cutillo G, Greggi S, Mancuso S. The pelvic retroperitoneal approach in the treatment of advanced ovarian carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:532–538.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Benedetti-Panici P, Maneschi F, Scambia G, Mancuso S. A new transabdominal approach to the left retroperitoneum for systematic removal of lymph nodes of the aorta in gynecologic malignancies. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:1060–1064.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Benedetti-Panici P, Scambia G, Baiocchi G, Greggi S, Mancuso S. Technique and feasibility of radical para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic malignancies: a prospective study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 1991;1:133–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Morley GW, Nichols DH. Gynaecological and obstetrical surgery: surgical treatment of vulvar carcinoma. CIC (Centro Italiano Congressi) International Edition. Rome, 1995:275–80.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Benedetti-Panici P, Maneschi F, Cutillo G, et al. A randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage after lymphadenectomy in gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 1997;65:478–482.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Piver S, Rutledge F, Smith JP. Five classes of extended hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1974;44:265–272.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Chassagne D, Sismondi P, Sinistrero G, et al. A glossary of reporting complications of treatment in gynecologic cancer. Radiother Oncol 1993;26:195–202.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Dean MM, Finan MA, Kline RC. Predictors of complications and hospital stay in gynecologic cancer surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:721–724.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kirschner CV, De Serto TM, Isaacs JK. Surgical treatment of the elderly patient with gynecologic cancer. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990;170:379–384.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pedersen T. Complications and death following anaesthesia. A prospective study with special reference to the influence of patient-, anaesthesia-, and surgery-related risk factors. Dan Med Bull 1994;41:319–331.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kirschner CV, De Serto TM, Isaacs JK. Surgical treatment of the elderly patient with gynecologic cancer. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990;170:379–384.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Scambia MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giannice, R., Foti, E., Poerio, A. et al. Perioperative Morbidity and Mortality in Elderly Gynecological Oncological Patients (≥70 Years) by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classes. Ann Surg Oncol 11, 219–225 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2004.03.080

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2004.03.080

Key Words

Navigation