Advertisement

Re: Modified Gastric Cancer AJCC Staging with a Classification Based on the Ratio of Regional Lymph Node Involvement: A Population-Based Cohort Study

  • Basil J. AmmoriEmail author
Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • 10 Downloads

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Gastric Cancer, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®), November 18, 2019. NCCN.org.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hundahl SA, Phillips JL, Menck HR. The National Cancer Data Base Report on poor survival of U.S. gastric carcinoma patients treated with gastrectomy: Fifth Edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging, proximal disease, and the “different disease” hypothesis. Cancer. 2000;88(4):921–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith DD, Schwarz RR, Schwarz RE. Impact of total lymph node count on staging and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: data from a large US-population database. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(28):7114–7124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Karpeh MS, Leon L, Klimstra D, et al. Lymph node staging in gastric cancer: is location more important than number? An analysis of 1,038 patients. Ann Surg. 2000;232(3):362–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim YI. Does the retrieval of at least 15 lymph nodes confer an improved survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer? J Gastric Cancer. 2014;14(2):111–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim YI. Is retrieval of at least 15 lymph nodes sufficient recommendation in early gastric cancer? Ann Surg Treat Res. 2014;87(4):180–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huang Z, Chen Y, Zhang W, et al. Modified gastric cancer AJCC staging with a classification based on the ratio of regional lymph node involvement: a population-based cohort study [published online ahead of print, 2019 Nov 27]. Ann Surg Oncol. (2019). http://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-08098-w.

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Oncology SurgeryKing Hussein Cancer CenterAl-Jubeiha, AmmanJordan

Personalised recommendations