Advertisement

Feasibility and Safety of Early Oral Intake and Discharge After Total or Proximal Gastrectomy: An Analysis of Consecutive Cases Without Exclusion Criteria

  • Masatoshi NakagawaEmail author
  • Masanori Tokunaga
  • Tomoki Aburatani
  • Yuya Sato
  • Takatoshi Matsuyama
  • Yasuaki Nakajima
  • Yusuke Kinugasa
Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • 79 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Postoperative feeding is administered relatively early in gastric surgery, especially distal gastrectomy, but its feasibility and safety for proximal gastric surgery remains unclear.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 91 consecutive patients who underwent total or proximal gastrectomy between 2014 and 2019. Baseline and perioperative results were prospectively recorded in our dataset. In our clinical pathway, sips of water and a soft diet were allowed on postoperative days 1 and 3. Discharge was set at days 6–8, and clinical pathway completion was defined as discharge by postoperative day 8.

Results

Median patient age was 69 years, and 25 patients (27%) were aged ≥ 75 years. Fifty-nine patients (65%) had comorbidities. Esophageal involvement occurred in 12 patients (13%), and there were 28 cases (31%) of pathological stage IA. The open approach was applied in 22 patients (24%), laparoscopy was applied in 53 patients (58%), and the robotic approach was applied in 16 patients (18%). Total gastrectomy was performed in 56 patients (62%) and proximal gastrectomy was performed in 35 patients (38%). Overall and severe (Clavien–Dindo grade III or higher) complications occurred in 24 (26%) and 9 (10%) patients, respectively. There were four cases (4%) of esophagojejunal leakage (three with esophagogastric junction cancer, one with long-term corticosteroid use). Clinical pathway completion was achieved in 66 patients (73%), with readmission of five cases (5%).

Conclusions

Early feeding and discharge for total or proximal gastrectomy is feasible and safe as long as it is carefully applied to high-risk patients, but we must be aware of the relatively higher readmission rate of this patient group.

Notes

Funding

This study was supported by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) under Grant Number 18ck0106310h0002.

Disclosure

Masatoshi Nakagawa, Masanori Tokunaga, Tomoki Aburatani, Yuya Sato, Takatoshi Matsuyama, Yasuaki Nakajima, and Yusuke Kinugasa declare they have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH, Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr. 2010;29(4):434–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Slim K. Fast-track surgery: the next revolution in surgical care following laparoscopy. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13(5):478–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Teeuwen PH, Bleichrodt RP, Strik C, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) versus conventional postoperative care in colorectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(1):88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Auyong DB, Allen CJ, Pahang JA, Clabeaux JJ, MacDonald KM, Hanson NA. Reduced length of hospitalization in primary total knee arthroplasty patients using an updated enhanced recovery after orthopedic surgery (ERAS) pathway. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(10):1705–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Muallem MZ, Dimitrova D, Pietzner K, et al. Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways in gynecologic oncology. A NOGGO-AGO* survey of 144 gynecological departments in Germany. Anticancer Res. 2016;36(8):4227–32.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yamada T, Hayashi T, Cho H, et al. Usefulness of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol as compared with conventional perioperative care in gastric surgery. Gastric Cancer. 2012;15(1):34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tanaka R, Lee SW, Kawai M, et al. Protocol for enhanced recovery after surgery improves short-term outcomes for patients with gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial. Gastric Cancer. 2017;20(5):861–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    So JB, Lim ZL, Lin HA, Ti TK. Reduction of hospital stay and cost after the implementation of a clinical pathway for radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2008;11(2):81–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim JW, Kim WS, Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH. Safety and efficacy of fast-track surgery in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial. World J Surg. 2012;36(12):2879–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Inokuchi M, Nakagawa M, Tanioka T, Okuno K, Gokita K, Kojima K. Long- and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy in patients with clinically and pathological locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(2):735–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nakagawa M, Kojima K, Inokuchi M, et al. Identification of frequency, severity and risk factors of complications after open gastrectomy: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected database using the Clavien–Dindo classification. J Med Dent Sci. 2016;63(2-3):53–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aburatani T, Kojima K, Otsuki S, et al. Double-tract reconstruction after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy using detachable ENDO-PSD. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(11):4848–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Okuno K, Gokita K, Tanioka T, et al. Esophagojejunostomy using the purse-string suturing device after laparoscopic total or proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Surg. 2017;41(10):2605–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mori T, Kimura T, Kitajima M. Skill accreditation system for laparoscopic gastroenterologic surgeons in Japan. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2010;19(1):18–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nakagawa M, Tomii C, Inokuchi M, Otsuki S, Kojima K. Feasibility of a clinical pathway with early oral intake and discharge for laparoscopic gastrectomy. Scand J Surg. 2018;107(3):218–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Makuuchi R, Sugisawa N, Kaji S, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery for gastric cancer and an assessment of preoperative carbohydrate loading. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(1):210–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Karran A, Wheat J, Chan D, Blake P, Barlow R, Lewis WG. propensity score analysis of an enhanced recovery programme in upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery. World J Surg. 2016;40(7):1645–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abdikarim I, Cao XY, Li SZ, Zhao YQ, Taupyk Y, Wang Q. Enhanced recovery after surgery with laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for stomach carcinomas. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(47):13339–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chen Hu J, Xin Jiang L, Cai L, et al. Preliminary experience of fast-track surgery combined with laparoscopy-assisted radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(10):1830–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ding J, Sun B, Song P, et al. The application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)/fast-track surgery in gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(43):75699–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wee IJY, Syn NL, Shabbir A, Kim G, So JBY. Enhanced recovery versus conventional care in gastric cancer surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials. Gastric Cancer. 2019;22(3):423–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li Z, Wang Q, Li B, Bai B, Zhao Q. Influence of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. World J Surg Oncol. 2017;15(1):207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yu Z, Zhuang CL, Ye XZ, Zhang CJ, Dong QT, Chen BC. Fast-track surgery in gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014;399(1):85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sahoo MR, Gowda MS, Kumar AT. Early rehabilitation after surgery program versus conventional care during perioperative period in patients undergoing laparoscopic assisted total gastrectomy. J Minim Access Surg. 2014;10(3):132–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Feng F, Ji G, Li JP, et al. Fast-track surgery could improve postoperative recovery in radical total gastrectomy patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(23):3642–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Etoh T, Honda M, Kumamaru H, et al. Morbidity and mortality from a propensity score-matched, prospective cohort study of laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: data from a nationwide web-based database. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(6):2766–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masatoshi Nakagawa
    • 1
    Email author
  • Masanori Tokunaga
    • 1
  • Tomoki Aburatani
    • 1
  • Yuya Sato
    • 1
  • Takatoshi Matsuyama
    • 1
  • Yasuaki Nakajima
    • 1
  • Yusuke Kinugasa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations