Primary Liver Cancer: An NCDB Analysis of Overall Survival and Margins After Hepatectomy
- 30 Downloads
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) constitute the majority of primary liver cancers. This retrospective review aimed to determine whether site of care is a significant predictor of patient outcome after hepatectomy as measured by overall survival, hazard ratios (HRs), and resection margin status.
Data regarding patients with a new diagnosis of ICC and HCC who underwent hepatectomy were analyzed from the national cancer database. The patients were divided into two cohorts: those receiving treatment at academic cancer centers (ACCs) and those receiving treatment at community cancer centers (CCCs). The study adjusted for confounding variables and selection bias using propensity score matching. Median overall survival (months), hazard ratios, and resection margin status (R0, R1/R2, unknown) were examined.
The inclusion criteria were met by 10,463 patients. After propensity matching, 5600 patients remained, with half receiving treatment at ACCs and half at CCCs. Median overall survival from the date of diagnosis for patients undergoing hepatectomy was longer at ACCs than at CCCs (28.3 vs 24.8 months; p < 0.001). Additionally, multivariable Cox proportional hazards models showed that treatment at CCCs was associated with poorer survival than treatment at ACCs (HR, 1.226; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.142–1.316; p < 0.0001). Treatment facility designation also was a predictive indicator of resection margin status, with patients at CCCs exhibiting higher odds of R1/R2 resections (odds ratio [OR], 1.41; 95% CI, 1.19–1.67; p < 0.0001).
Hepatectomy for ICC and HCC performed at ACCs was associated with improved outcomes compared with CCCs. Centralization of care to ACCs may lead to improved patient outcomes.
There are no conflicts of interest.
- 2.Liver and Intrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer–Cancer Stat Facts. Retrieved 2 August 2018 at https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/livibd.html.
- 3.Noone AM, Howlader N, Krapcho M, Miller D, Brest A, Yu M, et al. (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2015, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD. https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2015/.
- 12.Hsu RCJ, Salika T, Maw J, Lyratzopoulos G, Gnanapragasam VJ, Armitage JN. Influence of hospital volume on nephrectomy mortality and complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis stratified by surgical type. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e016833. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016833.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 13.Schrag D, Panageas KS, Riedel E, et al. Surgeon volume compared to hospital volume as a predictor of outcome following primary colon cancer resection. J Surg Oncol. 2003;83:68–78; discussion 78–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.10244.
- 17.Hyder O, Sachs T, Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Pawlik TM. Impact of hospital teaching status on length of stay and mortality among patients undergoing complex hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery in the USA. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract. 2013;17:2114–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2349-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.National Cancer Database. American College of Surgeons. Retrieved 1 August 2018 at https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/cancer/ncdb.
- 20.American College of Surgeons. Quality Programs. National Cancer Database. Participant User Files. Version: PUF 2014. Retrieved 2 August 2018 from https://www.facs.org/~/media/files/quality%20programs/cancer/ncdb/puf%20data%20dictionary%20version%20puf%202014.ashx.
- 21.Kosanke, J., Bergstralh, E. (2004, March). Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics—Mayo Clinic Research. Retrieved 6 June 2016, from http://bioinformaticstools.mayo.edu/research/vmatch/.
- 26.Gooiker GA, Gijn W van, Wouters MWJM, Post PN, Velde CJH van de, Tollenaar R a. EM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the volume–outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery. BJS. 2011;98:485–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7413.
- 28.Massarweh NN, El-Serag HB. Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Control J Moffitt Cancer Cent. 2017;24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073274817729245.
- 30.Gasper WJ, Glidden DV, Jin C, Way LW, Patti MG. Has recognition of the relationship between mortality rates and hospital volume for major cancer surgery in California made a difference? A follow-up analysis of another decade. Ann Surg. 2009;250:472–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b47c79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Hollenbeck BK, Taub DA, Miller DC, Dunn RL, Montie JE, Wei JT. The regionalization of radical cystectomy to specific medical centers. J Urol. 2005;174(4 Pt 1):1385–9; discussion 1389.Google Scholar
- 33.Wang Y, Luo Q, Li Y, Deng S, Wei S, Li X. Radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for small hepatocellular carcinomas: a meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e84484. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084484.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar