ASO Author Reflections: Trimming the Fat: Improving Access to Immediate Breast Reconstructive Surgery by Streamlining Operating Room Resources

  • Esta S. Bovill
  • Elaine C. McKevittEmail author
ASO Author Reflections



The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast-conserving surgery, simple mastectomy, and breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:1938–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boyd K, Temple C, Ross D. Factors affecting surgical wait times for breast reconstruction. Can J Plast Surg. 2010;18:107–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Head SJ, Seib R, Osborn JA, Schwarz SK. A “swing room” model based on regional anesthesia reduces turnover time and increases case throughput. Can J Anaesth. 2011;58:725–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mercereau P, Lee B, Head S, Schwarz S. A regional anesthesia-based “swing” room model reduces non-operating time in a mixed orthopedic inpatient outpatient population. Can J Anesth. 2012;59:943–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McKevitt E, Kuusk U, Dingee C, et al. Immediate reconstruction swing room scheduling reduces wait times to surgery and increases breast reconstruction rates. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:1276–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Collar RM, Shuman AG, Feiner S, McGonegal AK, Heidel N, Duck M, McLean SA, Billi JE, Healy DW, Bradford CR. Lean management in academic surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214:928–36.

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryProvidence Breast CenterVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations