Advertisement

Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 26, Issue 11, pp 3517–3525 | Cite as

Surgical Management of the Axilla in Clinically Node-Positive Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A National Cancer Database Analysis

  • Stephanie M. Wong
  • Anna Weiss
  • Elizabeth A. Mittendorf
  • Tari A. King
  • Mehra GolshanEmail author
Breast Oncology
  • 142 Downloads

Abstract

Background

The feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with clinically node-positive (cN+) disease who convert to clinically node-negative (cN0) disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been evaluated in several large clinical trials, but it remains unclear whether the approach has been broadly adopted in the United States.

Methods

The National Cancer Database was used to identify women diagnosed with cN+ breast cancer who received NAC followed by surgery between 2012 and 2015. Trends in axillary surgery were evaluated and multivariable logistic regression analyses performed to determine factors associated with receipt of SLNB.

Results

Of 12,965 women cN+ at baseline, the use of SLNB increased from 31.8% in 2012 to 49% in 2015 (p < 0.001). Using axillary pCR as a surrogate for patients who convert to cN0 following NAC, among 5127 (39.5%) ypN0 patients, SLNB increased from 38.2 to 58.4% over the study period (p < 0.001), resulting in avoidance of axillary dissection in 42.2% of ypN0 patients by 2015. In adjusted analyses, factors significantly associated with SLNB attempt included cN1 disease, age < 45 years, treatment facility type, triple-negative and HER2-positive subtypes, and year of diagnosis. In women with residual isolated tumor cells (ITCs), micrometastases, and ypN1 disease, SLNB was the only axillary procedure performed in 36.9%, 23.6%, and 13.0% of cases.

Conclusions

The use of SLNB in cN+ patients receiving NAC increased significantly between 2012 and 2015. SLNB alone was performed in more than 10% of patients with ypN1 disease, 20% with micrometastases, and 35% with ITCs; the oncologic safety of omitting axillary dissection in these patients requires further evaluation.

Notes

Disclosures

The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose. This study was supported by the Breast Cancer Research Foundation.

References

  1. 1.
    King TA, Morrow M. Surgical issues in patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015;12:335–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Classe JM, Bordes V, Campion L, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer: results of Ganglion Sentinelle et Chimiotherapie Neoadjuvante, a French prospective multicentric study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:726–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mamounas EP, Brown A, Anderson S, et al. Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2694–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alvarado R, Yi M, Le-Petross H, et al. The role for sentinel lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients who present with node-positive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:3177–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shen J, Gilcrease MZ, Babiera GV, et al. Feasibility and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy after preoperative chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with documented axillary metastases. Cancer. 2007;109:1255–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boileau JF, Poirier B, Basik M, et al. Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer: the SN FNAC study. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:258–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boughey JC, Suman VJ, Mittendorf EA, et al. Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;310:1455–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuehn T, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SENTINA): a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:609–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boughey JC, Suman VJ, Mittendorf EA, et al. Factors affecting sentinel lymph node identification rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer patients enrolled in ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance). Ann Surg. 2015;261:547–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boughey JC, Ballman KV, Le-Petross HT, et al. Identification and resection of clipped node decreases the false-negative rate of sentinel lymph node surgery in patients presenting with node-positive breast cancer (T0-T4, N1-N2) who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results from ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance). Ann Surg. 2016;263:802–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Galimberti V, Ribeiro Fontana SK, Maisonneuve P, et al. Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant treatment in breast cancer: five-year follow-up of patients with clinically node-negative or node-positive disease before treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42:361–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nguyen TT, Hoskin TL, Day CN, et al. Decreasing use of axillary dissection in node-positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:2596–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Caudle AS, Bedrosian I, Milton DR, et al. Use of sentinel lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis: practice patterns of American Society of Breast Surgeons Members. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:2925–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mamtani A, Barrio AV, King TA, et al. How often does neoadjuvant chemotherapy avoid axillary dissection in patients with histologically confirmed nodal metastases? Results of a prospective study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3467–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Laws A, Hughes ME, Hu J, et al. Impact of residual nodal disease burden on sentinel node mapping and accuracy of intraoperative frozen section in node-positive (cN1) breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:584–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vugts G, Maaskant-Braat AJ, de Roos WK, et al. Management of the axilla after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for clinically node positive breast cancer: a nationwide survey study in The Netherlands. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42:956–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Caudle AS, Yang WT, Krishnamurthy S, et al. Improved axillary evaluation following neoadjuvant therapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer using selective evaluation of clipped nodes: implementation of targeted axillary dissection. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:1072–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Donker M, Straver ME, Wesseling J, et al. Marking axillary lymph nodes with radioactive iodine seeds for axillary staging after neoadjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer patients: the MARI procedure. Ann Surg. 2015;261:378–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, et al. Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:881–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McMasters KM, Tuttle TM, Carlson DJ, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer: a suitable alternative to routine axillary dissection in multi-institutional practice when optimal technique is used. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2560–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    van Nijnatten TJA, Simons JM, Smidt ML, et al. A novel less-invasive approach for axillary staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with axillary node-positive breast cancer by combining radioactive iodine seed localization in the axilla with the sentinel node procedure (RISAS): A Dutch Prospective Multicenter Validation Study. Clin Breast Cancer. 2017;17:399–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mamounas EP, Anderson SJ, Dignam JJ, et al. Predictors of locoregional recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results from combined analysis of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3960–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mamounas EP, White JR, Bandos H, et al. NSABP B-51/RTOG 1304: Randomized phase III clinical trial evaluating the role of postmastectomy chest wall and regional nodal XRT (CWRNRT) and post-lumpectomy RNRT in patients (pts) with documented positive axillary (Ax) nodes before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) who convert to pathologically negative Ax nodes after NC. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:TPS1141-1.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fisher ER, Wang J, Bryant J, et al. Pathobiology of preoperative chemotherapy: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel (NSABP) protocol B-18. Cancer. 2002;95:681–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Klauber-DeMore N, Ollila DW, Moore DT, et al. Size of residual lymph node metastasis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer patients is prognostic. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:685–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Moo TA, Edelweiss M, Hajiyeva S, et al. Is low-volume disease in the sentinel node after neoadjuvant chemotherapy an indication for axillary dissection? Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:1488–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    NCCN Guidelines Version 3.2018 Breast Cancer. Published October 25, 2018. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf. Accessed 11 Nov 2018.
  28. 28.
    Masuda N, Lee SJ, Ohtani S, et al. Adjuvant capecitabine for breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2147–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    von Minckwitz G, Huang CS, Mano MS, et al. Trastuzumab emtansine for residual invasive HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:617–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Morrow M, Jagsi R, McLeod MC, et al. Surgeon attitudes toward the omission of axillary dissection in early breast cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:1511–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephanie M. Wong
    • 1
    • 2
  • Anna Weiss
    • 1
    • 2
  • Elizabeth A. Mittendorf
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tari A. King
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mehra Golshan
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Breast Surgery, Department of SurgeryBrigham and Women’s HospitalBostonUSA
  2. 2.Breast Oncology ProgramDana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer CenterBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations