Advertisement

Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 26, Issue 10, pp 3080–3088 | Cite as

Physician Knowledge of Breast Cancer Recurrence and Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk is Associated with Increased Recommendations for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: a Survey of Physicians at NAPBC-Accredited Centers

  • Olga Kantor
  • Cecilia Chang
  • Richard J. Bleicher
  • Meena Moran
  • James L. Connolly
  • Scott H. Kurtzman
  • Katharine YaoEmail author
  • The National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers Data Working Group
Scientific Presentation Award

Abstract

Background

Physician recommendation for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) has been shown to influence whether a patient chooses CPM. Few studies have explored physician knowledge about contralateral breast cancer (CBC) and local recurrence (LR) risk and whether knowledge is associated with recommendation for CPM.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of physicians at National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers-accredited breast centers across the USA. Physician knowledge levels of CBC and LR were assessed and correlated with recommendations for CPM.

Results

A total of 2412 physicians were surveyed with a 51% response rate (n = 1226). The results showed that 66% had correct knowledge about CBC risk and 57% had correct knowledge about LR. Moreover, 634 had high knowledge, viz. 176 (55.4%) breast surgeons, 171 (58.0%) medical oncologists, 196 (62.0%) radiation oncologists, and 72 (29.9%) plastic surgeons (p < 0.01). Compared with high knowledge, low knowledge was associated with favoring insurance coverage for patients at average CBC risk (53.8% vs. 39.8%, p < 0.01). Low knowledge was also associated with feeling that CPM was indicated in patients with high recurrence anxiety (39.2% vs. 28.9%), young patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative cancer (25.3% vs. 18.5%), and patients with two first-degree relatives with breast cancer (40.0% vs. 32.3%) (all p < 0.01). Multivariable analysis found physician type [odds ratio (OR) 3.76 for surgeons] and low knowledge (OR 1.46) to be significant independent predictors of favoring insurance coverage for CPM in patients at average risk.

Conclusions

Physician knowledge about CBC and LR could be improved. Lower knowledge is associated with favorable physician recommendations for CPM. It is not clear whether improving physician knowledge will change recommendations for CPM.

Notes

Acknowledgment

We would like to acknowledge the Chicago Platform Tennis League for providing the funding for this study.

Supplementary material

10434_2019_7559_MOESM1_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, Morris TJ, Virnig BA. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend towards more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(33):5203–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yao K, Stewart AK, Winchester DJ, Winchester DP. Trends in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral cancer: a report from the National Cancer Data Base, 1998-–2007. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(10):2554–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kurian AW, Lichtensztajn DY, Keegan TH, Nelson DO, Clarke CA, Gomez SL. Use of and mortality after bilateral mastectomy compared with other surgical treatments for breast cancer in California, 1998–2011. JAMA. 2014;312(9):902–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jagsi R, Hawley ST, Griffith KA, Janz NK, Kurian AW, Ward KC, Hamilton AS, Morrow M, Katz SJ. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy decisions in a population-based sample of patients with early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(3):274–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ager B, Butow P, Jansen J, Phillips KA, Porter D, CPM DA Advisory Group. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM): a systemic review of patient reported factors and psychological predictors influencing choice and satisfaction. Breast. 2016;28:107–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huang J, Chagpar A. Factors associated with decision to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy versus unilateral mastectomy. Am J Surg. 2018;S0002-9610(18)31243-1.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yao K, Belkora J, Bedrosian I, et al. Impact of an in-visit decision aid on patient knowledge about contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: a pilot study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(1):91–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rosenberg SM, Tracy MS, Meyer ME, et al. Perceptions, knowledge, and satisfaction with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among young women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional survey. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(6):373–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Parker PA, Peterson SK, Bedrosian I, et al. Prospective study of surgical decision-making processes for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2016;263(1):178–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bedrosian I, Yao K. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: anxiety, knowledge, and shared decision-making. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(12):3767–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yao K, Belkora J, Sisco M, Rosenberg S, Bedrosian I, Liederbach E, Wang C. Survey of the deficits in surgeons’ knowledge of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(4):391–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lopez CD, Bluebond-Langner R, Houssock CA, Slezak SS, Bellavance E. Plastic and reconstructive surgeons’ knowledge and comfort of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: a survey of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Front Oncol. 2019;8:647.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Soran A, Ibrahim A, Kanbour M, et al. Decision making and factors influencing long-term satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy in women with breast cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2015;38(2):179–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Katz SJ, Hawley ST, Hamilton AS, Ward KC, Morrow M, Jagsi R, Hofer TP. Surgeon influence on variation in receipt of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for women with breast cancer. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(1):29–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Musiello T, Bornhammar E, Saunders C. Breast surgeons’ perceptions and attitudes towards contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. ANZ J Surg. 2013;83(7–8):527–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bellavance E, Peppercorn J, Kronsberg S, et al. Surgeons’ perspectives of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(9):2779–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Winchester DP. The National Accreditation Program for Breast Cancers: quality improvement through standard setting. Surg Oncol Clin North Am. 2011;20(3):581–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nichols HB, Berrington A, Lacey JV, Rosenberg SP, Anderson WF. Declining incidence of contralateral breast cancer in the United States from 1975 to 2006. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(12):1564–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Akdeniz D, Schmidt MK, Sevnaeve CM, et al. Risk factors for metachronous contralateral breast cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Breast. 2019;44:1–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gao X, Fischer SG, Emani B. Risk of second primary breast cancer in the contralateral breast in women treated for early-stage breast cancer: a population-based study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56(4):1038–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reiner AS, Sisti J, John EM, et al. Breast cancer family history and contralateral breast cancer risk in young women: an update from the Women’s Environmental Cancer and Radiation Epidemiology study. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(15):1513–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mavaddat N, Peock S, Frost D, et al. Cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from prospective analysis of EMBRACE. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(11):812–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Molina-Montes E, Perez-Nevot B, Pollan M, Sanchez-Cantalejo E, Espin J, Sanchez MJ. Cumulative risk of a second primary contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1/BRCA2 carriers with a first breast cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Breast.2014;23:721–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(14):1143–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Voduc KD, Cheang MC, Tyldesley S, Gelmon K, Nielsen TO, Kennecke H. Breast cancer subtypes and the risk of local and regional relapse. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(10):1684–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryan J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Veronesi U, Salvadori B, Luini A, et al. Breast conservation is a safe method in patients with small cancer of the breast. Long-term results of three randomised trials on 1,973 patients. Eur J Cancer. 1995;31(10):1574–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jatoi I, Proschan MA. Randomized trials of breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy for primary breast cancer: a pooled analysis of updated results. Am J Clin Oncol. 2005;28(3):289–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Arvold ND, Taghian AG, Niemierko A, et al. Age, breast cancer subtype approximation, and local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(29):3885–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lowery AJ, Kell MR, Glynn RW, Kerin MJ, Sweeney KJ. Locoregional recurrence after breast cancer surgery: a systemic review by receptor phenotype. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;133(3):831–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clincial practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer. Version 1. 2019. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx. Accessed 14 April 2019.
  32. 32.
    Boughey JC, Attai DJ, Chen SL, et al. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy consensus statement from the American Society of Breast Surgeons: additional considerations and a framework for shared decision making. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(10):3106–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Manne SL, Smith BL, Frederick S, Mitarontondo A, Kashy DA, Kirstein LJ. B-Sure: a randomized pilot trial of an interactive web-based decision support aid versus usal care in average-risk breast cancer patients considering contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Transl Behav Med. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/iby133.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Portschy PR, Kuntz KM, Tuttle TM. Survival outcomes after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: a decision analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju160.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Davies KR, Brewster AM, Bedrosian I, et al. Outcomes of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in relation to familial history: a decision analysis (BRCR-D-16-00033). Breast Cancer Res. 2016;18(1):93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olga Kantor
    • 1
  • Cecilia Chang
    • 2
  • Richard J. Bleicher
    • 3
  • Meena Moran
    • 4
  • James L. Connolly
    • 5
  • Scott H. Kurtzman
    • 6
  • Katharine Yao
    • 7
    • 8
    Email author
  • The National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers Data Working Group
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Center for Biomedical Research InformaticsNorthShore University HealthSystemEvanstonUSA
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryFox Chase Cancer CenterPhiladelphiaUSA
  4. 4.Department of RadiologyYale MedicineNew HavenUSA
  5. 5.Department of PathologyBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterBostonUSA
  6. 6.Department of SurgeryWaterbury HospitalWaterburyUSA
  7. 7.Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of SurgeryNorthShore University HealthSystemEvanstonUSA
  8. 8.Pritzker School of MedicineUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations