Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 26, Issue 10, pp 3178–3184 | Cite as

Implementation of a Post-mastectomy Home Recovery Program in a Large, Integrated Health Care Delivery System

  • Brooke VuongEmail author
  • Amanda N. Graff-Baker
  • Mio Yanagisawa
  • Sharon B. Chang
  • Margaret Mentakis
  • Veronica Shim
  • Michele Knox
  • Lucinda Romero
  • Gillian Kuehner
Breast Oncology



The number of outpatient mastectomies, with and without reconstruction, has increased nationwide. In well-selected patient populations, same-day surgery for mastectomy is a safe option. A pilot project was initiated within the Kaiser Permanente Northern California healthcare system to facilitate surgical home recovery (SHR) for mastectomy patients, including patients undergoing implant-based reconstruction and bilateral mastectomies.


Surgical home recovery for mastectomy patients was implemented in October 2017. Specific measures in this initiative included management of patient expectations at initial consultation, education about postoperative home care, multimodality pain management, and timely post-discharge follow-up. All patients undergoing mastectomy were included, except those undergoing autologous tissue reconstructions. After a 6-month implementation period, rate of same day discharge over 6 months was compared before and after the SHR initiative. We also compared emergency department (ED) visits, reoperations, and readmissions within 7 days.


Twenty-one medical centers participated in this initiative. Before implementing SHR, 164 of the 717 (23%) mastectomies were outpatient procedures, compared with 403 of the 663 (61%) after the implementation period. Although the rate of outpatient mastectomy increased significantly, there were no statistically significant differences in ED visits (5.2% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.98), reoperation (3.5% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.99), or readmission rates (1.4% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.08).


By implementing standard expectations and sharing best practices, there was a significant increase in the rate of home recovery for mastectomy without compromising quality of patient care. The success of this pilot program supports SHR for mastectomy.



No disclosures.


  1. 1.
    Temple-Oberle C, Shea-Budgell MA, Tan M, et al. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in breast reconstruction: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(5):1056e–71e.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ackerman RS, Hirschi M, Alford B, Evans T, Kiluk J V, Patel SY. Enhanced REVENUE After Surgery? A Cost-Standardized Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Mastectomy Decreases Length of Stay. World J Surg. 2019;43(3):839–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dumestre DO, Webb CE, Temple-Oberle C. Improved recovery experience achieved for women undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction using an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(3):550–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(3):292–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kambouris A. Physical, psychological, and economic advantages of accelerated discharge after surgical treatment for breast cancer. Am Surg. 1996;62(2):123–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Olsen M, Lefta M, Dietz JR, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection following major breast surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;207(3):326–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Steiner CA, Karaca Z, Moore BJ, Imshaug MC, Pickens G. Surgeries in Hospital-Based Ambulatory Surgery and Hospital Inpatient Settings, 2014. HCUP Statistical Brief #223. May 2017. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.
  8. 8.
    Shahbazi S, Woods SJ. Influence of physician, patient, and health care system characteristics on the use of outpatient mastectomy. Am J Surg. 2016;211(4):802–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Case C, Steiner C. Outpatient mastectomy: clinical, payer, and geographic influences. HSR Heal Serv Res. 2001;36(5):869–84Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dumestre DO, Redwood J, Webb CE, Temple-Oberle C. Enhanced recovery after surgery (Eras) protocol enables safe same-day discharge after alloplastic breast reconstruction. Plast Surg. 2017;25(4):249–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Margolese RG, Lasry JC. Ambulatory surgery for breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7(3):181–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Olasehinde O, Alatise O, Arowolo O, et al. Safety and feasibility of early postmastectomy discharge and home drain care in a low resource setting. J Surg Oncol. 2018;118(6):861–866.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yanik JM, Bedard NA, Hanley JM, Otero JE, Callaghan JJ, Marsh JL. Rapid recovery total joint arthroplasty is safe, efficient, and cost-effective in the Veterans Administration setting. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(10):3138–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gordon NP. Similarity of the Adult Kaiser Permanente Membership in Northern California to the Insured and General Population in Northern California: statistics from the 2009 California Health Interview Survey. Intern Div Res Rep. 2012:1–15.
  15. 15.
    Kruper L, Xu XX, Henderson K, Bernstein L, Chen SL. Utilization of mastectomy and reconstruction in the outpatient setting. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(3):828–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tan LR, Guenther JM. Outpatient definitive breast cancer surgery. Am Surg. 1997;63(10):865–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McManus SA, Topp DA, Hopkins C. Advantages of outpatient breast surgery. Am Surg. 1994;60(12):967–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Simpson SA, Ying BL, Ross LA, et al. Incidence of complications in outpatient mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205(3):463–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marla S, Stallard S. Systematic review of day surgery for breast cancer. Int J Surg. 2009;7(4):318–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Offodile AC, Gu C, Boukovalas S, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways in breast reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;173(1):65–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brooke Vuong
    • 1
    Email author
  • Amanda N. Graff-Baker
    • 2
  • Mio Yanagisawa
    • 3
  • Sharon B. Chang
    • 4
  • Margaret Mentakis
    • 1
  • Veronica Shim
    • 5
  • Michele Knox
    • 6
  • Lucinda Romero
    • 7
  • Gillian Kuehner
    • 8
  1. 1.Surgical Oncology, Department of SurgeryKaiser Permanente South Sacramento Medical CenterSacramentoUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryThe Permanente Medical GroupSan JoseUSA
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryUniversity of California Davis Health SystemSacramentoUSA
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryThe Permanente Medical GroupFremontUSA
  5. 5.Department of SurgeryThe Permanente Medical GroupOaklandUSA
  6. 6.Department of OphthalmologyThe Permanente Medical GroupFremontUSA
  7. 7.Department of SurgeryThe Permanente Medical GroupSanta RosaUSA
  8. 8.Department of SurgeryThe Permanente Medical GroupVallejoUSA

Personalised recommendations