Advertisement

Why Travel for Complex Cancer Surgery? Americans React to ‘Brand-Sharing’ Between Specialty Cancer Hospitals and Their Affiliates

  • Alexander S. Chiu
  • Benjamin Resio
  • Jessica R. Hoag
  • Andres F. Monsalve
  • Justin D. Blasberg
  • Lawrence Brown
  • Audrey Omar
  • Marney A. White
  • Daniel J. Boffa
Health Services Research and Global Oncology

Abstract

Introduction

Leading cancer hospitals have increasingly shared their ‘brand’ with smaller hospitals through affiliations. Because each brand evokes a distinct reputation for the care provided, ‘brand-sharing’ has the potential to impact the public’s ability to differentiate the safety and quality within hospital networks. The general public was surveyed to determine the perceived similarities and differences in the safety and quality of complex cancer surgery performed at top cancer hospitals and their smaller affiliate hospitals.

Methods

A national, web-based KnowledgePanel (GfK) survey of American adults was conducted. Respondents were asked about their beliefs regarding the quality and safety of complex cancer surgery at a large, top-ranked cancer hospital and a smaller, local hospital, both in the presence and absence of an affiliation between the hospitals.

Results

A total of 1010 surveys were completed (58.1% response rate). Overall, 85% of respondents felt ‘motivated’ to travel an hour for complex surgery at a larger hospital specializing in cancer, over a smaller local hospital. However, if the smaller hospital was affiliated with a top-ranked cancer hospital, 31% of the motivated respondents changed their preference to the smaller hospital. When asked to compare leading cancer hospitals and their smaller affiliates, 47% of respondents felt that surgical safety, 66% felt guideline compliance, and 53% felt cure rates would be the same at both hospitals.

Conclusions

Approximately half of surveyed Americans did not distinguish the quality and safety of surgical care at top-ranked cancer hospitals from their smaller affiliates, potentially decreasing their motivation to travel to top centers for complex surgical care.

Supplementary material

10434_2018_6868_MOESM1_ESM.docx (18 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 17 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Hillner BE, Smith TJ, Desch CE. Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(11):2327–2340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EVA, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1128–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reames BN, Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Hospital volume and operative mortality in the modern era. Ann Surg. 2014;260(2):244–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Bridges JF, Amini N, Kim Y, Pawlik TM. Choosing a cancer surgeon: analyzing factors in patient decision making using a best-worst scaling methodology. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(12):3732–3738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pope DG. Reacting to rankings: evidence from “America’s Best Hospitals”. J Health Econ. 2009;28(6):1154–1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dafny L. Hospital industry consolidation: still more to come? N Engl J Med. 2014;370(3):198–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Marth NJ, Goodman DC. Regionalization of high-risk surgery and implications for patient travel times. JAMA. 2003;290(20):2703–2708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hanauer DA, Zheng K, Singer DC, Gebremariam A, Davis MM. Public awareness, perception, and use of online physician rating sites. JAMA. 2014;311(7):734–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tomlinson T, De Vries R, Ryan K, Kim HM, Lehpamer N, Kim SY. Moral concerns and the willingness to donate to a research biobank. JAMA. 2015;313(4):417–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chiong W, Kim AS, Huang IA, Farahany NA, Josephson SA. Testing the presumption of consent to emergency treatment for acute ischemic stroke. JAMA. 2014;311(16):1689–1691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grande D, Mitra N, Shah A, Wan F, Asch DA. Public preferences about secondary uses of electronic health information. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(19):1798–1806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rhodes DJ, Radecki Breitkopf C, Ziegenfuss JY, Jenkins SM, Vachon CM. Awareness of breast density and its impact on breast cancer detection and risk. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(10):1143–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    GfK. Knowledge panel design summary. Palo Alto, CA: GfK; 2013.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chiu AS, Arnold BN, Hoag JR, et al. Quality versus quantity: the potential impact of public reporting of hospital safety for complex cancer surgery. Ann Surg. Epub 24 Apr 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002762.
  15. 15.
    Cutler DM, Scott Morton F. Hospitals, market share, and consolidation. JAMA. 2013;310(18):1964–1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Urbach DR. Pledging to eliminate low-volume surgery. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(15):1388–1390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Potential benefits of the new leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures. Surgery. 2004;135(6):569–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chiu A, Resio B, Hoag J, et al. US public perceptions about cancer care provided by smaller hospitals associated with large hospitals recognized for specializing in cancer care. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(7):1008–1009.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.1400.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tsai TC, Jha AK. Hospital consolidation, competition, and quality: is bigger necessarily better? JAMA. 2014;312(1):29–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dranove D, Lindrooth R. Hospital consolidation and costs: another look at the evidence. J Health Econ. 2003;22(6):983–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tsai TC, Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Gawande AA, Jha AK. Variation in surgical-readmission rates and quality of hospital care. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(12):1134–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Funk LM, Gawande AA, Semel ME, et al. Esophagectomy outcomes at low-volume hospitals: the association between systems characteristics and mortality. Ann Surg. 2011;253(5):912–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sheetz KH, Ryan AM, Ibrahim AM, Dimick JB. Association of hospital network participation with surgical outcomes and medicare expenditures. Ann Surg. Epub 18 Apr 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002791.
  24. 24.
    Emmert M, Schlesinger M. Patients’ awareness, usage and impact of hospital report cards in the US. Patient. 2017;10(6):729–738.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mulvey GK, Wang Y, Lin Z, et al. Mortality and readmission for patients with heart failure among U.S. News & World Report’s top heart hospitals. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2(6):558–565.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang OJ, Wang Y, Lichtman JH, Bradley EH, Normand SL, Krumholz HM. “America’s Best Hospitals” in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(13):1345–1351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Escarce JJ, Kapur K. Do patients bypass rural hospitals? Determinants of inpatient hospital choice in rural California. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2009;20(3):625–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Buczko W. Bypassing of local hospitals by rural Medicare beneficiaries. J Rural Health. 1994;10(4):237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tai W-TC, Porell FW, Adams EK. Hospital choice of rural medicare beneficiaries: patient, hospital attributes, and the patient–physician relationship. Health Serv Res. 2004;39(6 Pt 1):1903–1922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Roh C-Y, Moon MJ. Nearby, but not wanted? The bypassing of rural hospitals and policy implications for rural health care systems. Policy Stud J. 2005;33(3):377–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Finlayson SR, Birkmeyer JD, Tosteson AN, Nease RF, Jr. Patient preferences for location of care: implications for regionalization. Med Care. 1999;37(2):204–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander S. Chiu
    • 1
  • Benjamin Resio
    • 1
  • Jessica R. Hoag
    • 2
  • Andres F. Monsalve
    • 1
  • Justin D. Blasberg
    • 3
  • Lawrence Brown
    • 3
  • Audrey Omar
    • 4
  • Marney A. White
    • 5
    • 6
  • Daniel J. Boffa
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryYale School of MedicineNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research CenterYale School of MedicineNew HavenUSA
  3. 3.Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of SurgeryYale University School of MedicineNew HavenUSA
  4. 4.Yale Center for Analytic SciencesYale School of MedicineNew HavenUSA
  5. 5.Department of Social and Behavioral SciencesYale School of Public HealthNew HavenUSA
  6. 6.Department of PsychiatryYale School of MedicineNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations