Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 25, Issue 12, pp 3580–3586 | Cite as

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Right Colectomy with Complete Mesocolic Excision for the Treatment of Colon Cancer: Perioperative Outcomes and 5-Year Survival in a Consecutive Series of 202 Patients

  • Giuseppe Spinoglio
  • Paolo P. Bianchi
  • Alessandra Marano
  • Fabio Priora
  • Luca M. Lenti
  • Ferruccio Ravazzoni
  • Wanda Petz
  • Simona Borin
  • Dario Ribero
  • Giampaolo Formisano
  • Emilio BertaniEmail author
Colorectal Cancer



During the past decade, the concept of complete mesocolic excision (CME) has emerged as a possible strategy to minimize recurrence for right colon cancers. The purpose of this study was to compare robotic versus laparoscopic CME in performing right colectomy for cancer.


Pertinent data of all patients who underwent robotic or laparoscopic right colectomy with CME using a Pfannenstiel incision and intracorporeal anastomosis performed between October 2005 and November 2015 were entered in a prospectively maintained database.


A total of 202 patients underwent robotic (n = 101) or laparoscopic (n = 101) right colectomy within the study period. Patient characteristics were equivalent between groups. The robotic group showed a statistically significant reduction in conversion rate (0% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.01) but a longer operative time (279 min vs. 236 min, p < 0.001) compared with the laparoscopic group. There were no other differences in perioperative clinical or pathological outcomes. Five-years overall survival was 77 versus 73 months for the robotic versus laparoscopic groups (p = 0.64). The disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 85% and 83% for the robotic versus laparoscopic groups (p = 0.58). Among UICC stage III patients, there was a slight but not significant difference in 5-year DFS for the robotic group (81 vs. 68 months; p = 0.122).


Both approaches for right colectomy with CME were safe and feasible and resulted in excellent survival. Robotic assistance was beneficial for performing intracorporeal anastomosis and dissection as evidenced by the lower conversion rates. Further robotic experience may shorten the operative time.



The authors thank Dr. Carlo Di Pietrantonj (Senior Statistician, Regional Epidemiology Unit SeREMI, Local Health Unit, Alessandria, Italy) for his help with the statistical support.

Conflicts of interest and Source of Funding

Dr. Giuseppe Spinoglio is a proctor and speaker for Intuitive Surgical Inc. and he received a grant from Intuitive Surgical Inc. for a study outside the submitted work titled “Sentinel lymph node identification in colon cancer with robotic near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent imaging system.” Drs. Fabio Priora and Luca Matteo Lenti are proctors to Intuitive Surgical, Inc. For the remaining authors, no conflicts of interest were declared.


  1. 1.
    Gouvas N, Pechlivanides G, Zervakis N, Kafousi M, Xynos E. Complete mesocolic excision in colon cancer surgery: a comparison between open and laparoscopic approach. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:1357–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, Papadopoulos T, Merkel S. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation–technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11:354–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bernhoff R, Sjövall A, Buchli C, Granath F, Hol T, Martling A. Complete Mesocolic Excision (CME) in right sided colon cancer does not increase severe short term postoperative adverse events. Colorectal Dis. 2017 Nov 1. [Epub ahead of print].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zurleni T, Cassiano A, Gjoni E, Ballabio A, Serio G, Marzoli L, Zurleni F. Correction to: Surgical and oncological outcomes after complete mesocolic excision in right-sided colon cancer compared with conventional surgery: a retrospective, single-institution study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33(1):113–4. Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bertelsen CA, Kirkegaard-Klitbo A, Nielsen M, Leotta SM, Daisuke F, Gögenur I. Pattern of colon cancer lymph node metastases in patients undergoing central mesocolic lymph node excision: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(12):1209–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shin JK, Kim HC, Lee WY, Yun SH, Cho YB, Huh JW, Park YA, Chun HK. Laparoscopic modified mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation in right-sided colon cancer shows better short- and long-term outcomes compared with the open approach in propensity score analysis. Surg Endosc. 2017 Nov 3. [Epub ahead of print].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Siani LM, Lucchi A, Berti P, Garulli G. Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation in 600 right total mesocolectomies: safety, prognostic factors and oncologic outcome. Am J Surg. 2017;214(2):222–7. [Epub].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wu QB, Deng XB, Yang XY, Chen BC, He WB, Hu T, Wei MT, Wang ZQ. Hand-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation: a novel technique for right colon cancer. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(8):3383–90. Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spinoglio G, Marano A, Bianchi PP, Priora F, Lenti LM, Ravazzoni F, Formisano G. Robotic right colectomy with modified complete mesocolic excision: long-term oncologic outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(Suppl 5):684–91. [Epub 2016 Oct 3].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Petz W, Ribero D, Bertani E, Borin S, Formisano G, Esposito S, Spinoglio G, Bianchi PP. Suprapubic approach for robotic complete mesocolic excision in right colectomy: oncologic safety and short-term outcomes of an original technique. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(11):2060–6. Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ozben V, Baca B, Atasoy D, Bayraktar O, Aghayeva A, Cengiz TB, Erguner I, Karahasanoglu T, Hamzaoglu I. Robotic complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(10):4624–5. [Epub 2016 Feb 22].CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    deSouza AL, Prasad LM, Park JJ, Marecik SJ, Blumetti J, Abcarian H. Robotic assistance in right hemicolectomy: is there a role? Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:1000–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Park JS, Choi GS, Park SY, Kim HJ, Ryuk JP. Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy. Br J Surg. 2012;99:1219–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kehlet H. Fast-track colorectal surgery. Lancet. 2008;371:791–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shawki S, Bashankaev B, Denoya P, Seo C, Weiss EG, Wexner SD. What is the definition of “conversion” in laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2321–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Altman DG MD, Bryant TN, Gardner M. Statistics with confidence—confidence intervals and statistical guidelines. BMJ BOOKS. 2001.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang Y, Zhang C, Zhang D, Fu Z, Sun Y. Clinical outcome of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision in the treatment of right colon cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2017;15(1):174. Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fung AK, Aly EH. Robotic colonic surgery: is it advisable to commence a new learning curve? Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:786–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Koch OO, Pointner R, Granderath FA. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery of the colon and rectum. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(1):1–11. [Epub 2011 Aug 20].CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Morpurgo E, Contardo T, Molaro R, Zerbinati A, Orsini C, D’Annibale A. Robotic-assisted intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: a case control study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2013;23:414–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Simorov A, Shaligram A, Shostrom V, Boilesen E, Thompson J, Oleynikov D. Laparoscopic colon resection trends in utilization and rate of conversion to open procedure: a national database review of academic medical centers. Ann Surg. 2012;256:462–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:477–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3061–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zarak A, Castillo A, Kichler K, de la Cruz L, Tamariz L, Kaza S. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colonic disease: a meta-analysis of postoperative variables. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(6):1341–7. [Epub 2015 Apr 7].CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Widmar M, Keskin M, Strombom P, Beltran P, Chow OS, Smith JJ, Nash GM, Shia J, Russell D, Garcia-Aguilar J. Lymph node yield in right colectomy for cancer: a comparison of open, laparoscopic and robotic approaches. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19(10):888–94. Scholar
  27. 27.
    Munkedal DL, Laurberg S, Hagemann-Madsen R, Stribolt KJ, Krag SR, Quirke P, West NP. Significant individual variation between pathologists in the evaluation of colon cancer specimens after complete mesocolic excision. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(10):953–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giuseppe Spinoglio
    • 1
  • Paolo P. Bianchi
    • 2
  • Alessandra Marano
    • 3
  • Fabio Priora
    • 3
  • Luca M. Lenti
    • 3
  • Ferruccio Ravazzoni
    • 3
  • Wanda Petz
    • 1
  • Simona Borin
    • 1
  • Dario Ribero
    • 4
  • Giampaolo Formisano
    • 2
  • Emilio Bertani
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Gastrointestinal SurgeryEuropean Institute of OncologyMilanItaly
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryMisericordia HospitalGrossetoItaly
  3. 3.Department of General and Oncologic SurgerySS Antonio and Biagio HospitalAlessandriaItaly
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryCandiolo Cancer InstituteTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations