Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Right Colectomy with Complete Mesocolic Excision for the Treatment of Colon Cancer: Perioperative Outcomes and 5-Year Survival in a Consecutive Series of 202 Patients
- 15 Downloads
During the past decade, the concept of complete mesocolic excision (CME) has emerged as a possible strategy to minimize recurrence for right colon cancers. The purpose of this study was to compare robotic versus laparoscopic CME in performing right colectomy for cancer.
Pertinent data of all patients who underwent robotic or laparoscopic right colectomy with CME using a Pfannenstiel incision and intracorporeal anastomosis performed between October 2005 and November 2015 were entered in a prospectively maintained database.
A total of 202 patients underwent robotic (n = 101) or laparoscopic (n = 101) right colectomy within the study period. Patient characteristics were equivalent between groups. The robotic group showed a statistically significant reduction in conversion rate (0% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.01) but a longer operative time (279 min vs. 236 min, p < 0.001) compared with the laparoscopic group. There were no other differences in perioperative clinical or pathological outcomes. Five-years overall survival was 77 versus 73 months for the robotic versus laparoscopic groups (p = 0.64). The disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 85% and 83% for the robotic versus laparoscopic groups (p = 0.58). Among UICC stage III patients, there was a slight but not significant difference in 5-year DFS for the robotic group (81 vs. 68 months; p = 0.122).
Both approaches for right colectomy with CME were safe and feasible and resulted in excellent survival. Robotic assistance was beneficial for performing intracorporeal anastomosis and dissection as evidenced by the lower conversion rates. Further robotic experience may shorten the operative time.
The authors thank Dr. Carlo Di Pietrantonj (Senior Statistician, Regional Epidemiology Unit SeREMI, Local Health Unit, Alessandria, Italy) for his help with the statistical support.
Conflicts of interest and Source of Funding
Dr. Giuseppe Spinoglio is a proctor and speaker for Intuitive Surgical Inc. and he received a grant from Intuitive Surgical Inc. for a study outside the submitted work titled “Sentinel lymph node identification in colon cancer with robotic near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent imaging system.” Drs. Fabio Priora and Luca Matteo Lenti are proctors to Intuitive Surgical, Inc. For the remaining authors, no conflicts of interest were declared.
- 3.Bernhoff R, Sjövall A, Buchli C, Granath F, Hol T, Martling A. Complete Mesocolic Excision (CME) in right sided colon cancer does not increase severe short term postoperative adverse events. Colorectal Dis. 2017 Nov 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13950. [Epub ahead of print].CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 4.Zurleni T, Cassiano A, Gjoni E, Ballabio A, Serio G, Marzoli L, Zurleni F. Correction to: Surgical and oncological outcomes after complete mesocolic excision in right-sided colon cancer compared with conventional surgery: a retrospective, single-institution study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33(1):113–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2936-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 6.Shin JK, Kim HC, Lee WY, Yun SH, Cho YB, Huh JW, Park YA, Chun HK. Laparoscopic modified mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation in right-sided colon cancer shows better short- and long-term outcomes compared with the open approach in propensity score analysis. Surg Endosc. 2017 Nov 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5970-6. [Epub ahead of print].CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 7.Siani LM, Lucchi A, Berti P, Garulli G. Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation in 600 right total mesocolectomies: safety, prognostic factors and oncologic outcome. Am J Surg. 2017;214(2):222–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.10.005. [Epub].CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 8.Wu QB, Deng XB, Yang XY, Chen BC, He WB, Hu T, Wei MT, Wang ZQ. Hand-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation: a novel technique for right colon cancer. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(8):3383–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5354-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 10.Petz W, Ribero D, Bertani E, Borin S, Formisano G, Esposito S, Spinoglio G, Bianchi PP. Suprapubic approach for robotic complete mesocolic excision in right colectomy: oncologic safety and short-term outcomes of an original technique. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(11):2060–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2017.07.020.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 11.Ozben V, Baca B, Atasoy D, Bayraktar O, Aghayeva A, Cengiz TB, Erguner I, Karahasanoglu T, Hamzaoglu I. Robotic complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(10):4624–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4786-0. [Epub 2016 Feb 22].CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 17.Altman DG MD, Bryant TN, Gardner M. Statistics with confidence—confidence intervals and statistical guidelines. BMJ BOOKS. 2001.Google Scholar
- 25.Zarak A, Castillo A, Kichler K, de la Cruz L, Tamariz L, Kaza S. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colonic disease: a meta-analysis of postoperative variables. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(6):1341–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4197-7. [Epub 2015 Apr 7].CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 26.Widmar M, Keskin M, Strombom P, Beltran P, Chow OS, Smith JJ, Nash GM, Shia J, Russell D, Garcia-Aguilar J. Lymph node yield in right colectomy for cancer: a comparison of open, laparoscopic and robotic approaches. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19(10):888–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13786.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar