Advertisement

Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 899–906 | Cite as

Effect of c-Met and CD44v6 Expression in Resistance to Chemotherapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

  • Takeo Hara
  • Tomoki MakinoEmail author
  • Makoto Yamasaki
  • Koji Tanaka
  • Yasuhiro Miyazaki
  • Tsuyoshi Takahashi
  • Yukinori Kurokawa
  • Kiyokazu Nakajima
  • Nariaki Matsuura
  • Masaki Mori
  • Yuichiro Doki
TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH AND BIOMARKERS

Abstract

Background

c-Met relies on CD44v6 for its activation and signaling in several cancer cell lines. However, the correlation of c-Met and CD44v6 expression and its biological significance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unknown.

Methods

Expression of c-Met and CD44v6 was examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 147 ESCC specimens. We analyzed the impact of c-Met and CD44v6 expression on clinicopathological parameters, including chemoresistance or prognosis in ESCC.

Results

High expression of c-Met and CD44v6 in cancerous lesions was identified in 49.7% and 50.3% of all patients, respectively. The c-Met-high group comprised more advanced pT and pM stages than the c-Met-low group. In addition, more patients in the c-Met-high group received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) than the c-Met-low group (64.4% vs. 43.2%, P = 0.010). On the other hand, the CD44v6-high group was associated with more advanced pT/pN stages and a poorer clinical response to NACT (response rate 53.5% vs. 77.8%, P = 0.025) than the CD44v6-low group. Double-positive immunostaining of c-Met and CD44v6 was identified in 28.6% of all cases, and multivariate analysis of overall survival (OS) identified them (hazard ratio 1.79, 95% confidence interval 1.03–3.04, P = 0.038) as independent prognostic factors in addition to pN and pM stage.

Conclusions

c-Met/CD44v6 were associated with tumor progression or chemoresistance. Double-positive expression of c-Met and CD44v6 negatively impacted patient prognosis in ESCC, implying that c-Met and CD44v6 are candidates for targeted therapy in ESCC.

Notes

Author Contributions

TH, TM, MY, MM, and YD: conception, design of the study; TH, TM, MY, KT, and YD: surgery and acquisition of clinical data; TH: immunohistochemical staining; TH, TM, and NM: evaluation of immunohistochemical staining; TH, TM, YM, TT, YK, and KN: analysis of data; TH: drafting the article; TM: critical revision of the article; MM and YD: final approval of the article.

Supplementary material

10434_2018_7126_MOESM1_ESM.tif (193 kb)
Supplemental Fig. S1 Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of overall survival among patients who (a) did not receive preoperative therapy classified by c-Met expression, (b) did not receive preoperative therapy classified by CD44v6 expression, (c) did not receive preoperative therapy classified by c-Met and CD44v6 expression, (d) received preoperative chemotherapy classified by c-Met expression, (e) received preoperative chemotherapy classified by CD44v6 expression, and (f) received preoperative chemotherapy classified by c-Met and CD44v6 expression (TIFF 193 kb)
10434_2018_7126_MOESM2_ESM.tif (154 kb)
Supplemental Fig. S2 Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of overall survival according to c-Met/CD44v6 expression in (a) pT1-2 group, (b) pN0 group, (c) pT3-4 group, (d) pN1-3 group (TIFF 154 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87–108.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, et al. A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(1):68–74.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Makino T, Doki Y, Miyata H, et al. Use of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography to evaluate responses to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for primary tumor and lymph node metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Surgery. 2008;144(5):793–802.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bahrami A, Shahidsales S, Khazaei M, et al. C-Met as a potential target for the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer: Current status and future perspectives. J Cell Physiol. 2017;232(10):2657–73.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boccaccio C, Comoglio PM. Invasive growth: a MET-driven genetic programme for cancer and stem cells. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6(8):637–45.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Trusolino L, Bertotti A, Comoglio PM. MET signalling: principles and functions in development, organ regeneration and cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11(12):834–48.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tomihara H, Yamada D, Eguchi H, et al. MicroRNA-181b-5p, ETS1, and the c-Met pathway exacerbate the prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after radiation therapy. Cancer Sci. 2017;108(3):398–407.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim JH, Kim BJ, Kim HS. Clinicopathological impacts of high c-Met expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis and review. Oncotarget. 2017;8(68):113120–8.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wilson GD, Thibodeau BJ, Fortier LE, et al. Cancer stem cell signaling during repopulation in head and neck cancer. Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016:1894782.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li C, Wu JJ, Hynes M, et al. c-Met is a marker of pancreatic cancer stem cells and therapeutic target. Gastroenterology. 2011;141(6):2218–27 e2215.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sun S, Wang Z. Head neck squamous cell carcinoma c-Met(+) cells display cancer stem cell properties and are responsible for cisplatin-resistance and metastasis. Int J Cancer. 2011;129(10):2337–48.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bicaku E, Xiong Y, Marchion DC, et al. In vitro analysis of ovarian cancer response to cisplatin, carboplatin, and paclitaxel identifies common pathways that are also associated with overall patient survival. Br J Cancer. 2012;106(12):1967–75.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aebersold DM, Kollar A, Beer KT, Laissue J, Greiner RH, Djonov V. Involvement of the hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor receptor c-met and of Bcl-xL in the resistance of oropharyngeal cancer to ionizing radiation. Int J Cancer. 2001;96(1):41–54.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    De Bacco F, Luraghi P, Medico E, et al. Induction of MET by ionizing radiation and its role in radioresistance and invasive growth of cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(8):645–61.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen GZ, Dai WS, Zhu HC, et al. Foretinib enhances the radiosensitivity in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by inhibiting phosphorylation of c-Met. J Cancer. 2017;8(6):983–92.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scagliotti GV, Shuster D, Orlov S, et al. Tivantinib in combination with erlotinib versus erlotinib alone for EGFR-Mutant NSCLC: an exploratory analysis of the Phase 3 MARQUEE Study. J Thorac Oncol. 2018;13(6):849–54.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pant S, Patel M, Kurkjian C, et al. A Phase II Study of the c-Met inhibitor tivantinib in combination with FOLFOX for the treatment of patients with previously untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus, gastroesophageal junction, or stomach. Cancer Invest. 2017;35(7):463–72.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rimassa L, Abbadessa G, Personeni N, et al. Tumor and circulating biomarkers in patients with second-line hepatocellular carcinoma from the randomized phase II study with tivantinib. Oncotarget. 2016;7(45):72622–33.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lai AZ, Abella JV, Park M. Crosstalk in Met receptor oncogenesis. Trends Cell Biol. 2009;19(10):542–51.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tremmel M, Matzke A, Albrecht I, et al. A CD44v6 peptide reveals a role of CD44 in VEGFR-2 signaling and angiogenesis. Blood. 2009;114(25):5236–44.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Orian-Rousseau V, Chen L, Sleeman JP, Herrlich P, Ponta H. CD44 is required for two consecutive steps in HGF/c-Met signaling. Genes Dev. 2002;16(23):3074–86.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Matzke-Ogi A, Jannasch K, Shatirishvili M, et al. Inhibition of tumor growth and metastasis in pancreatic cancer models by interference with CD44v6 signaling. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(2):513–25 e510.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Snyder EL, Bailey D, Shipitsin M, Polyak K, Loda M. Identification of CD44v6(+)/CD24- breast carcinoma cells in primary human tumors by quantum dot-conjugated antibodies. Lab Invest. 2009;89(8):857–66.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Todaro M, Gaggianesi M, Catalano V, et al. CD44v6 is a marker of constitutive and reprogrammed cancer stem cells driving colon cancer metastasis. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;14(3):342–56.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ozawa Y, Nakamura Y, Fujishima F, et al. c-Met in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: an independent prognostic factor and potential therapeutic target. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:451.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhang T, Li H, Zhang Y, Wang P, Bian H, Chen ZN. Expression of proteins associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Lett. 2018;15(3):3042–8.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yang H, Liu J, Yu H, et al. Expression and association of CD44v6 with prognosis in T2-3N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6(2):91–8.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ren JL, Wu HF, Wang WJ, et al. C-Met as a potential novel prognostic marker in squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of esophagus: evidence from a meta-analysis. Panminerva Med. 2017;59(1):97–106.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Xu Y, Peng Z, Li Z, et al. Expression and clinical significance of c-Met in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:6.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumors. 7th edn. 2010, Oxford.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yamashita K, Makino T, Yamasaki M, et al. Comparison of short-term outcomes between 2- and 3-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2017;30(11):1–8.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Miyata H, Yamasaki M, Miyazaki Y, et al. Clinical importance of supraclavicular lymph node metastasis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2015;262(2):280–5.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Makino T, Yamasaki M, Miyata H, et al. Solitary Lymph node recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: surgical failure or systemic disease? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(6):2087–93.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Colvin H, Mizushima T, Eguchi H, Takiguchi S, Doki Y, Mori M. Gastroenterological surgery in Japan: the past, the present and the future. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2017;1(1):5–10.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Miyata H, Yamasaki M, Takahashi T, et al. Relevance of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-positive lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for squamous cell oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg. 2013;100(11):1490–7.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Makino T, Yamasaki M, Tanaka K, et al. Metabolic tumor volume change predicts long-term survival and histological response to preoperative chemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002808 Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Diseases JSfE. Guidelines for the clinical and pathologic studies on carcinoma of the esophagus. 11th edn. 2015, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Xu YP, Lin G, Sun XJ, et al. C-Met as a molecular marker for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and its association with clinical outcome. J Cancer. 2016;7(5):587–94.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sierra JR, Tsao MS. c-MET as a potential therapeutic target and biomarker in cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2011;3(1 Suppl):S21–35.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dulak AM, Stojanov P, Peng S, et al. Exome and whole-genome sequencing of esophageal adenocarcinoma identifies recurrent driver events and mutational complexity. Nat Genet. 2013;45(5):478–86.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bandla S, Pennathur A, Luketich JD, et al. Comparative genomics of esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93(4):1101–6.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chen C, Zhao S, Karnad A, Freeman JW. The biology and role of CD44 in cancer progression: therapeutic implications. J Hematol Oncol. 2018;11(1):64.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hu B, Luo W, Hu RT, Zhou Y, Qin SY, Jiang HX. Meta-analysis of prognostic and clinical significance of CD44v6 in esophageal cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(31):e1238.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rimassa L, Assenat E, Peck-Radosavljevic M, et al. Tivantinib for second-line treatment of MET-high, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (METIV-HCC): a final analysis of a phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(5):682–93.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wang H, Jiang D, Song Q, et al. Prognostic impact and potential interaction of EGFR and c-Met in the progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(7):9771–9.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zheng B, Ni CH, Chen H, et al. New evidence guiding extent of lymphadenectomy for esophagogastric junction tumor: Application of Ber-Ep4 Joint with CD44v6 staining on the detection of lower mediastinal lymph node micrometastasis and survival analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(14):e6533.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takeo Hara
    • 1
  • Tomoki Makino
    • 1
    Email author
  • Makoto Yamasaki
    • 1
  • Koji Tanaka
    • 1
  • Yasuhiro Miyazaki
    • 1
  • Tsuyoshi Takahashi
    • 1
  • Yukinori Kurokawa
    • 1
  • Kiyokazu Nakajima
    • 1
  • Nariaki Matsuura
    • 2
    • 3
  • Masaki Mori
    • 1
  • Yuichiro Doki
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryOsaka University, Graduate School of MedicineSuita CityJapan
  2. 2.Osaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Molecular PathologyOsaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Division of Health SciencesSuita CityJapan

Personalised recommendations