Advertisement

Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 479–481 | Cite as

Robotic-Assisted Resection of Adrenal Aldosteronoma

  • Carlos Galvani
  • Maria V. Gorodner
  • N. Joseph EspatEmail author
Endocrine Tumors

Since the introduction of laparoscopic adrenalectomy in 1992, the procedure has been widely adopted for the surgical treatment of a wide variety of adrenal tumors.1 Contrary to the traditional open adrenalectomy, the minimally invasive approach is associated with decreased postoperative pain, morbidity, and hospital stay. In addition, there is shorter recovery and well-known aesthetic benefits. For these reasons, benign adrenal tumors are generally removed via a minimally invasive approach. At present, controversy persists on only the oncologic outcome of the utilization of laparoscopic surgery for known adrenal cancers and large tumors with malignant potential.2

Despite all of these clear benefits, the transition from open to laparoscopic adrenalectomy is not without impediments. This is at least in part related to some of the well-known disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery. Specifically, the need for specialized training to perform advanced laparoscopic procedures, the use of rigid...

Keywords

Adrenal Tumor Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy Advanced Laparoscopic Skill Operating Room Table Left Adrenal Vein 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MPG 121716 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Gagner M, Lacroix A, Bolte E. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy in Cushing’s syndrome and pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:1033.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Duh QY. Presidential address: minimally invasive endocrine surgery–standard of treatment or hype? Surgery. 2003;134:849–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Horgan S, Vanuno D. Robots in laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2001;11:415–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lal G, Duh QY. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy—indications and technique. Surg Oncol. 2003;12:105–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brunaud L, Bresler L, Zarnegar R, et al. Does robotic adrenalectomy improve patient quality of life when compared to laparoscopic adrenalectomy? World J Surg. 2004;28:1180–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hanly EJ, Zand J, Bachman SL, Marohn MR, Talamini MA. Value of the SAGES Learning Center in introducing new technology. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:477–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Germay O, et al. Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg. 2001;25:1467–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, et al. Computer-enhanced robotic telesurgery. Initial experience in foregut surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1790–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Satava RM. Robotic surgery: from past to future—a personal journey. Surg Clin North Am. 2003;83:1491–500, xii.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morino M, Beninca G, Giraudo G, Del Genio GM, Rebecchi F, Garrone C. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1742–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Undre S, Munz Y, Moorthy K, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy: preliminary UK results. BJU Int. 2004;93:357–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Surgical Oncology 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos Galvani
    • 1
  • Maria V. Gorodner
    • 1
  • N. Joseph Espat
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Hepatobiliary and Surgical OncologyRoger Williams Cancer CenterProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations