Abstract
The buccal mucosa appears as a promissory route for biologic drug administration, and pharmaceutical films are flexible dosage forms that can be used in the buccal mucosa as drug delivery systems for either a local or systemic effect. Recently, thin films have been used as printing substrates to manufacture these dosage forms by inkjet printing. As such, it is necessary to investigate the effects of printing biologics on films as substrates in terms of their physical and mucoadhesive properties. Here, we explored solvent casting as a conventional method with two biocompatible polymers, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, and chitosan, and we used electrospinning process as an electrospun film fabrication of polycaprolactone fibers due to its potential to elicit mucoadhesion. Lysozyme was used as biologic drug model and was formulated as a solution for printing by thermal inkjet printing. Films were characterized before and after printing by mechanical and mucoadhesive properties, surface, and ultrastructure morphology through scanning electron microscopy and solid state properties by thermal analysis. Although minor differences were detected in micrographs and thermograms in all polymeric films tested, neither mechanical nor mucoadhesive properties were affected by these differences. Thus, biologic drug printing on films was successful without affecting their mechanical or mucoadhesive properties. These results open way to explore biologics loading on buccal films by inkjet printing, and future efforts will include further in vitro and in vivo evaluations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zhao L, Ren T, Wang DD. Clinical pharmacology considerations in biologics development. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2012;33:1339–47.
Irvine DJ, Su X, Kwong B. Routes of delivery for biological drug products. Pharm Sci Encycl [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2010 [cited 2015 Aug 11]. Available from:http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470571224.pse521/abstract.
Blackstone EA, Joseph PF. The economics of biosimilars. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2013;6:469–78.
Jin J, Zhu L, Chen M, Xu H, Wang H, Feng X, et al. The optimal choice of medication administration route regarding intravenous, intramuscular, and subcutaneous injection. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015;9:923–42.
Petrak F, Herpertz S, Stridde E, Pfützner A. Psychological insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes patients regarding oral antidiabetes treatment, subcutaneous insulin injections or inhaled insulin. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013;15:703–11.
Vangeli E, Bakhshi S, Baker A, Fisher A, Bucknor D, Mrowietz U, et al. A systematic review of factors associated with non-adherence to treatment for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Adv Ther. 2015;32:983–1028.
Yavuz DG, Ozcan S, Deyneli O. Adherence to insulin treatment in insulin-naïve type 2 diabetic patients initiated on different insulin regimens. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015;9:1225–31.
Montenegro-Nicolini M, Morales JO. Overview and future potential of buccal mucoadhesive films as drug delivery systems for biologics. AAPS PharmSciTech [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Apr 19]; Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1208/s12249-016-0525-z
Nanci A. Ten Cate’s oral histology: development, structure and function, Elsevier Health Sciences; 2008.
Morales JO, Huang S, Williams RO, McConville JT. Films loaded with insulin-coated nanoparticles (ICNP) as potential platforms for peptide buccal delivery. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2014;122:38–45.
Harde H, Agrawal AK, Jain S. Tetanus toxoid-loaded layer-by-layer nanoassemblies for efficient systemic, mucosal, and cellular immunostimulatory response following oral administration. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2015;5:498–510.
Chen G, Bunt C, Wen J. Mucoadhesive polymers-based film as a carrier system for sublingual delivery of glutathione. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2015;67:26–34.
Parodi B, Russo E, Baldassari S, Zuccari G, Pastorino S, Yan M, et al. Development and characterization of a mucoadhesive sublingual formulation for pain control: extemporaneous oxycodone films in personalized therapy. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2017;43:917–24.
Bala R, Pawar P, Khanna S, Arora S. Orally dissolving strips: a new approach to oral drug delivery system. Int J Pharm Investig. 2013;3:67–76.
Dixit RP, Puthli SP. Oral strip technology: overview and future potential. J Control Release. 2009;139:94–107.
Silva MM, Calado R, Marto J, Bettencourt A, Almeida AJ, Gonçalves LMD. Chitosan nanoparticles as a mucoadhesive drug delivery system for ocular administration. Mar Drugs. 2017;15.
Montenegro-Nicolini M, Miranda V, Morales JO. Inkjet printing of proteins: an experimental approach. AAPS J [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Oct 15]; Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1208/s12248-016-9997-8
Buanz ABM, Belaunde CC, Soutari N, Tuleu C, Gul MO, Gaisford S. Ink-jet printing versus solvent casting to prepare oral films: effect on mechanical properties and physical stability. Int J Pharm. 2015;494:611–8.
Siemann U. Solvent cast technology—a versatile tool for thin film production. Scatt Methods Prop Polym Mater [Internet]. Springer; 2005 [cited 2015 Oct 21]. p. 1–14. Available from: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/b107336
Netchacovitch L, Thiry J, De Bleye C, Dumont E, Dispas A, Hubert C, et al. A simple calibration approach based on film-casting for confocal Raman microscopy to support the development of a hot-melt extrusion process. Talanta. 2016;154:392–9.
Tang Y, Liang G, Chen J, Yu S, Li Z, Rao L, et al. Highly reflective nanofiber films based on electrospinning and their application on color uniformity and luminous efficacy improvement of white light-emitting diodes. Opt Express. 2017;25:20598–611.
Schruben DL, Gonzalez P. Dispersity improvement in solvent casting particle/polymer composite. Polym Eng Sci. 2000;40:139–42.
Huang Z-M, Zhang Y-Z, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S. A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol. 2003;63:2223–53.
Preis M, Woertz C, Kleinebudde P, Breitkreutz J. Oromucosal film preparations: classification and characterization methods. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2013;10:1303–17.
Dahiya M, Saha S, Shahiwala AF. A review on mouth dissolving films. Curr Drug Deliv. 2009;6:469–76.
Shepherd R, Reader S, Falshaw A. Chitosan functional properties. Glycoconj J. 1997;14:535–42.
Yuan G, Chen X, Li D. Chitosan films and coatings containing essential oils: the antioxidant and antimicrobial activity, and application in food systems. Food Res Int. 2016;89:117–28.
Nicolazzo JA, Reed BL, Finnin BC. Buccal penetration enhancers—how do they really work? J Control Release. 2005;105:1–15.
Wu C-S. A comparison of the structure, thermal properties, and biodegradability of polycaprolactone/chitosan and acrylic acid grafted polycaprolactone/chitosan. Polymer. 2005;46:147–55.
Woodruff MA, Hutmacher DW. The return of a forgotten polymer—polycaprolactone in the 21st century. Prog Polym Sci. 2010;35:1217–56.
Zhou Q, Zhang H, Zhou Y, Yu Z, Yuan H, Feng B, et al. Alkali-mediated miscibility of gelatin/polycaprolactone for electrospinning homogeneous composite nanofibers for tissue scaffolding. Macromol Biosci. 2017;17
Genina N, Janßen EM, Breitenbach A, Breitkreutz J, Sandler N. Evaluation of different substrates for inkjet printing of rasagiline mesylate. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2013;85:1075–83.
Tang ZG, Black RA, Curran JM, Hunt JA, Rhodes NP, Williams DF. Surface properties and biocompatibility of solvent-cast poly[ε-caprolactone] films. Biomaterials. 2004;25:4741–8.
Zhang Y, Ouyang H, Lim CT, Ramakrishna S, Huang Z-M. Electrospinning of gelatin fibers and gelatin/PCL composite fibrous scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005;72:156–65.
Qin X, Wu D. Effect of different solvents on poly(caprolactone) (PCL) electrospun nonwoven membranes. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2012;107:1007–13.
Beachley V, Wen X. Effect of electrospinning parameters on the nanofiber diameter and length. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2009;29:663–8.
Katsogiannis KAG, Vladisavljević GT, Georgiadou S. Porous electrospun polycaprolactone (PCL) fibres by phase separation. Eur Polym J. 2015;69:284–95.
Morales JO, Ross AC, McConville JT. Protein-coated nanoparticles embedded in films as delivery platforms. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2013;65:827–38.
D20 Committee. Test method for tensile properties of thin plastic sheeting D882–02 [Internet]. ASTM International; 2012. Available from: http://www.astm.org/doiLink.cgi?D882.
Morales JO, McConville JT. Manufacture and characterization of mucoadhesive buccal films. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2011;77:187–99.
Perioli L, Ambrogi V, Angelici F, Ricci M, Giovagnoli S, Capuccella M, et al. Development of mucoadhesive patches for buccal administration of ibuprofen. J Control Release. 2004;99:73–82.
Rotta J, Minatti E, Barreto PLM. Determination of structural and mechanical properties, diffractometry, and thermal analysis of chitosan and hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC) films plasticized with sorbitol. Food Sci Technol Camp. 2011;31:450–5.
Ford JL. Thermal analysis of hydroxypropylmethylcellulose and methylcellulose: powders, gels and matrix tablets. Int J Pharm. 1999;179:209–28.
Sakurai K, Maegawa T, Takahashi T. Glass transition temperature of chitosan and miscibility of chitosan/poly(N-vinyl pyrrolidone) blends. Polymer. 2000;41:7051–6.
Speranza V, Sorrentino A, De Santis F, Pantani R. Characterization of the polycaprolactone melt crystallization: complementary optical microscopy, DSC, and AFM studies [Internet]. Sci. World J. 2014 [cited 2018 Mar 4]. Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/720157/
Darbasi M, Askari G, Kiani H, Khodaiyan F. Development of chitosan based extended-release antioxidant films by control of fabrication variables. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017;104:303–10.
Rabek CL, Stelle RV, Dziubla TD, Puleo DA. The effect of plasticizers on the erosion and mechanical properties of polymeric films. J Biomater Appl [Internet]. 2014;28. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3766411/.
Joshi S, Petereit H-U. Film coatings for taste masking and moisture protection. Int J Pharm. 2013;457:395–406.
Tian H, Liu D, Yao Y, Ma S, Zhang X, Xiang A. Effect of sorbitol plasticizer on the structure and properties of melt processed polyvinyl alcohol films. J Food Sci. 2017;82:2926–32.
Gupta RK. Fundamentals of polymers. McGraw-Hill; 1998.
Meier MM, Kanis LA, Soldi V. Characterization and drug-permeation profiles of microporous and dense cellulose acetate membranes: influence of plasticizer and pore forming agent. Int J Pharm. 2004;278:99–110.
Prateepchanachai S, Thakhiew W, Devahastin S, Soponronnarit S. Mechanical properties improvement of chitosan films via the use of plasticizer, charge modifying agent and film solution homogenization. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;174:253–61.
Prabu D, Majdalawieh AF, Abu-Yousef IA, Inbasekaran K, Balasubramaniam T, Nallaperumal N, et al. Preparation and characterization of gatifloxacin-loaded sodium alginate hydrogel membranes supplemented with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and hydroxypropyl cellulose polymers for wound dressing. Int J Pharm Investig. 2016;6:86–95.
Leach MK, Feng Z-Q, Tuck SJ, Corey JM. Electrospinning fundamentals: optimizing solution and apparatus parameters. J Vis Exp JoVE [Internet]. 2011; Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3182658/.
Sarac AS. Nanofibers of conjugated polymers. CRC Press; 2016.
Croisier F, Duwez A-S, Jérôme C, Léonard AF, van der Werf KO, Dijkstra PJ, et al. Mechanical testing of electrospun PCL fibers. Acta Biomater. 2012;8:218–24.
Al-Dhubiab BE, Al-Dhubiab BE. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of nano-based films for buccal delivery of zolpidem. Braz Oral Res [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2017 Oct 21];30. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1806-83242016000100316&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en.
Agarwal S, Murthy RSR. Effect of different polymer concentration on drug release rate and physicochemical properties of Mucoadhesive gastroretentive tablets. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2015;77:705–14.
Mati-Baouche N, Elchinger P-H, de Baynast H, Pierre G, Delattre C, Michaud P. Chitosan as an adhesive. Eur Polym J. 2014;60:198–212.
Lo H-Y, Kuo H-T, Huang Y-Y. Application of polycaprolactone as an anti-adhesion biomaterial film. Artif Organs. 2010;34:648–53.
Shi Q, Wong S-C, Ye W, Hou J, Zhao J, Yin J. Mechanism of adhesion between polymer fibers at nanoscale contacts. Langmuir. 2012;28:4663–71.
Mortazavian E, Dorkoosh FA, Rafiee-Tehrani M. Design, characterization and ex vivo evaluation of chitosan film integrating of insulin nanoparticles composed of thiolated chitosan derivative for buccal delivery of insulin. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2014;40:691–8.
Vuddanda PR, Alomari M, Dodoo CC, Trenfield SJ, Velaga S, Basit AW, et al. Personalisation of warfarin therapy using thermal ink-jet printing. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018;117:80–7.
Janßen EM, Schliephacke R, Breitenbach A, Breitkreutz J. Drug-printing by flexographic printing technology—a new manufacturing process for orodispersible films. Int J Pharm. 2013;441:818–25.
Pinheiro MJ, Freitas S, Miranda EA, de Alcântara Pessôa Filho P. Solubility of lysozyme in aqueous solution containing ethanol or acetone: unexpected dependence on the initial protein concentration. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2016;429:9–13.
Meléndez PA, Kane KM, Ashvar CS, Albrecht M, Smith PA. Thermal inkjet application in the preparation of oral dosage forms: dispensing of prednisolone solutions and polymorphic characterization by solid-state spectroscopic techniques. J Pharm Sci. 2008;97:2619–36.
Wickström H, Palo M, Rijckaert K, Kolakovic R, Nyman JO, Määttänen A, et al. Improvement of dissolution rate of indomethacin by inkjet printing. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2015;75:91–100.
Choi M, Park HH, Choi D, Han U, Park TH, Lee H, et al. Multilayer nanofilms via inkjet printing for stabilizing growth factor and designing desired cell developments. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017;6:n/a-n/a.
HP. Product specifications: HP 61XL black ink cartridge [Internet]. [cited 2018 Mar 13]. Available from: http://store.hp.com/us/en/pdp/hp-61xl-high-yield-black-original-ink-cartridge-p-ch563wn-140--1.
HP. Product specifications: HP 61XL tri-color ink cartridge [Internet]. [cited 2018 Mar 13]. Available from: http://store.hp.com/us/en/pdp/hp-61xl-high-yield-tri-color-original-ink-cartridge-p-ch564wn-140--1.
Irfan M, Rabel S, Bukhtar Q, Qadir MI, Jabeen F, Khan A. Orally disintegrating films: a modern expansion in drug delivery system. Saudi Pharm J. 2016;24:537–46.
Planchette C, Pichler H, Wimmer-Teubenbacher M, Gruber M, Gruber-Woelfler H, Mohr S, et al. Printing medicines as orodispersible dosage forms: Effect of substrate on the printed micro-structure. Int J Pharm [Internet]. [cited 2016 Feb 25]; Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378517315303227
Funding
M. Montenegro-Nicolini acknowledges the funding support from CONICYT 21150995. J.O. Morales thanks the financial support from FONDECYT 1181689 and FONDAP 15130011. Andrónico Neira-Carrillo thanks the financial support from FONDECYT 1171520.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors report no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.
Additional information
Guest Editors: Niklas Sandler and Jukka Rantanen
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Montenegro-Nicolini, M., Reyes, P.E., Jara, M.O. et al. The Effect of Inkjet Printing over Polymeric Films as Potential Buccal Biologics Delivery Systems. AAPS PharmSciTech 19, 3376–3387 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-018-1105-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-018-1105-1