Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Formulation Factors on the Aerosol Performance and Stability of Lysozyme Powders: a Systematic Approach

  • Research Article
  • Theme: Team Science and Education for Pharmaceuticals: the NIPTE Model
  • Published:
AAPS PharmSciTech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the growing interest in developing biologics for pulmonary delivery, systematic fast screening methods are needed for rapid development of formulations. Due to the labile nature of macromolecules, the development of stable, biologically active formulations with desired aerosol performance imposes several challenges both from a formulation and processing perspective. In this study, spray-freeze-drying was used to develop respirable protein powders. In order to systematically map the selected design space, lysozyme aqueous pre-formulations were prepared based on a constrained mixture design of experiment. The physicochemical properties of the resulting powders were characterized and the effects of formulation factors on aerosol performance and protein stability were systematically screened using a logic flow chart. Our results elucidated several relevant formulation attributes (density, total solid content, protein:sugars ratio) required to achieve a stable lysozyme powder with desirable characteristics for pulmonary delivery. A similar logical fast screening strategy could be used to delineate the appropriate design space for different types of proteins and guide the development of powders with pre-determined aerodynamic properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morales JO, Fathe KR, Brunaugh A, Ferrati S, Li S, Montenegro-Nicolini M, et al. Challenges and future prospects for the delivery of biologics: oral mucosal, pulmonary, and transdermal routes. AAPS J. 2017:1–17.

  2. Fathe K, Ferrati S, Moraga-Espinoza D, Yazdi A, DC Smyth H. Inhaled biologics: from preclinical to product approval. Curr Pharm Des. 2016;22(17):2501–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Garcia-Contreras L, Smyth HD. Liquid-spray or dry-powder systems for inhaled delivery of peptide and proteins? Ame J Drug Deliv. 2005;3(1):29–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou QT, Tang P, Leung SSY, Chan JGY, Chan H-K. Emerging inhalation aerosol devices and strategies: where are we headed? Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;75:3–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shoyele SA, Cawthorne S. Particle engineering techniques for inhaled biopharmaceuticals. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006;58(9):1009–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Adler M, Lee G. Stability and surface activity of lactate dehydrogenase in spray-dried trehalose. J Pharm Sci. 1999;88(2):199–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Costantino HR, Firouzabadian L, Hogeland K, Wu C, Beganski C, Carrasquillo KG, et al. Protein spray-freeze drying. Effect of atomization conditions on particle size and stability. Pharm Res. 2000;17(11):1374–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Maa Y-F, Nguyen P-A, Sweeney T, Shire SJ, Hsu CC. Protein inhalation powders: spray drying vs spray freeze drying. Pharm Res. 1999;16(2):249–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Costantino HR, Firouzabadian L, Wu C, Carrasquillo KG, Griebenow K, Zale SE, et al. Protein spray freeze drying. 2. Effect of formulation variables on particle size and stability. J Pharm Sci. 2002;91(2):388–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Webb SD, Golledge SL, Cleland JL, Carpenter JF, Randolph TW. Surface adsorption of recombinant human interferon-γ in lyophilized and spray-lyophilized formulations. J Pharm Sci. 2002;91(6):1474–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Passot S, Fonseca F, Alarcon-Lorca M, Rolland D, Marin M. Physical characterisation of formulations for the development of two stable freeze-dried proteins during both dried and liquid storage. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2005;60(3):335–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Carpenter JF, Pikal MJ, Chang BS, Randolph TW. Rational design of stable lyophilized protein formulations: some practical advice. Pharm Res. 1997;14(8):969–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang W. Lyophilization and development of solid protein pharmaceuticals. Int J Pharm. 2000;203:1):1–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mensink MA, Frijlink HW, van der Voort Maarschalk K, Hinrichs WL. How sugars protect proteins in the solid state and during drying (review): mechanisms of stabilization in relation to stress conditions. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2017;114:288–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zbacnik TJ, Holcomb RE, Katayama DS, Murphy BM, Payne RW, Coccaro RC, et al. Role of buffers in protein formulations. J Pharm Sci. 2017;106(3):713–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Carpenter JF, Chang BS, Garzon-Rodriguez W, Randolph TW. Rational design of stable lyophilized protein formulations: theory and practice. Rational design of stable protein formulations 2002:109–33.

  17. Carrasquillo KG, Stanley AM, Aponte-Carro JC, De Jésus P, Costantino HR, Bosques CJ, et al. Non-aqueous encapsulation of excipient-stabilized spray-freeze dried BSA into poly (lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres results in release of native protein. J Control Release. 2001;76(3):199–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu Z, Johnston KP, Williams RO. Spray freezing into liquid versus spray-freeze drying: influence of atomization on protein aggregation and biological activity. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2006;27(1):9–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nguyen XC, Herberger JD, Burke PA. Protein powders for encapsulation: a comparison of spray-freeze drying and spray drying of darbepoetin alfa. Pharm Res. 2004;21(3):507–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sonner C, Maa YF, Lee G. Spray-freeze-drying for protein powder preparation: particle characterization and a case study with trypsinogen stability. J Pharm Sci. 2002;91(10):2122–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson OL, Jaworowicz W, Cleland JL, Bailey L, Charnis M, Duenas E, et al. The stabilization and encapsulation of human growth hormone into biodegradable microspheres. Pharm Res. 1997;14(6):730–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bi R, Shao W, Wang Q, Zhang N. Spray-freeze-dried dry powder inhalation of insulin-loaded liposomes for enhanced pulmonary delivery. J Drug Target. 2008;16(9):639–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Murugappan S, Patil HP, Kanojia G, ter Veer W, Meijerhof T, Frijlink HW, et al. Physical and immunogenic stability of spray freeze-dried influenza vaccine powder for pulmonary delivery: comparison of inulin, dextran, or a mixture of dextran and trehalose as protectants. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2013;85(3):716–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Amorij J-P, Saluja V, Petersen AH, Hinrichs WL, Huckriede A, Frijlink HW. Pulmonary delivery of an inulin-stabilized influenza subunit vaccine prepared by spray-freeze drying induces systemic, mucosal humoral as well as cell-mediated immune responses in BALB/c mice. Vaccine. 2007;25(52):8707–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zijlstra GS, Hinrichs WL, de Boer AH, Frijlink HW. The role of particle engineering in relation to formulation and de-agglomeration principle in the development of a dry powder formulation for inhalation of cetrorelix. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2004;23(2):139–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shire SJ. 4—formulation of proteins and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Monoclonal Antibodies: Woodhead Publishing; 2015. p. 93–120.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Dailymed. Available from: https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/.

  28. Bulk denisty and tap density. The United States Pharmacopeial Convention. 2011;General chapter <616>.

  29. Physical tests and determinations: inhalation and nasal drug products: aerosols, sprays, and powders—performance quality tests. United States Pharrmacopeia and National Formulary (USP 39-NF 34). Rockville MD: United States Pharmacopeial Convention; 2016. p. 423–49.

  30. Enzymatic assay of lysozyme (Sigma-Aldrich). Available from: http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/technical-documents/protocols/biology/enzymatic-assay-of-lysozyme.html.

  31. Mohammad MA, Grimsey IM, Forbes RT. Mapping the solid-state properties of crystalline lysozyme during pharmaceutical unit-operations. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2015;114:176–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Yu Z, Garcia AS, Johnston KP, Williams RO. Spray freezing into liquid nitrogen for highly stable protein nanostructured microparticles. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2004;58(3):529–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Patton JS, Byron PR. Inhaling medicines: delivering drugs to the body through the lungs. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6(1):67–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Byron PR. Prediction of drug residence times in regions of the human respiratory tract following aerosol inhalation. J Pharm Sci. 1986;75(5):433–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Miller DP, Tan T, Tarara TE, Nakamura J, Malcolmson RJ, Weers JG. Physical characterization of tobramycin inhalation powder: I. Rational design of a stable engineered-particle formulation for delivery to the lungs. Mol Pharm. 2015;12(8):2582–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ji S, Thulstrup PW, Mu H, Hansen SH, van de Weert M, Rantanen J, et al. Investigation of factors affecting the stability of lysozyme spray dried from ethanol-water solutions. Int J Pharm. 2017;534(1–2):263–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lee T, Chang GD. Sucrose conformational polymorphism: a jigsaw puzzle with multiple routes to a unique solution. Crystal Growth and Design. 2009;9(8):3551–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ferrati S, Wu T, Fuentes O, Brunaugh AD, Kanapuram SR, Smyth HDC. A systematic analysis of the effect of formulation parameters on the aerosol performance and stability of aerosol performance and stability of spray freeze dried protein powders. Respir Drug Deliv (RDD) Conf Proc. 2018;

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the members of Smyth lab (in particular to Dr. Matthew Herpin and Daniel Moraga), to Dr. Abbe Haser, and to the team at Amgen (in particular Nitin Anghan and Michael Schneider) for valuable feedbacks.

Funding

This work was supported by Amgen Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hugh D. C. Smyth.

Ethics declarations

The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by the University of Texas at Austin in accordance with its policy on objectivity in research.

Conflict of Interest

The author (HDCS) of this paper consults for and has equity ownership in Respira Therapeutics and Nob Hill Therapeutics on inhaled product development. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated By: Ajaz S. Hussain, Kenneth Morris, and Vadim J. Gurvich

Some of the findings of this study have been accepted as an abstract at the Respiratory Drug Delivery (RDD) annual conference, Tucson, NM, and will be partially published as an abstract as part of conference proceedings [38].

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 1428 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferrati, S., Wu, T., Fuentes, O. et al. Influence of Formulation Factors on the Aerosol Performance and Stability of Lysozyme Powders: a Systematic Approach. AAPS PharmSciTech 19, 2755–2766 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-018-0980-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-018-0980-9

KEY WORDS

Navigation